Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Page 4 of about 4,907 results (0.175 seconds)

Dr. Dinesh Sharma Vs. Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC973

..... jain ; state of bihar and ors. v. bihar distillery ltd. and ors. ; south central railway employees co-operative credit society employees' union, secunderabad v. registrar of co-operative societies and ors. ; subash chander sharma and anr. v. state of punjab and ors. ; bharathidasan university and anr. v ..... . madanlal dan and sons, bareilly ; annapurna biscuit . v. commissioner of income-tax, andhra pradesh, hyderabad ; m.v. elisabeth and ors. v. harwan investment and trading pvt. ltd., hanoekar house. swatontapeth, vasco-de-gama, goa ; institute of chartered accountants of india v. price waterhouse and anr. ; sultana begum v. prem chand ..... appropriate orders or directions as are necessary in order to prevent persons from being subjected to lengthy proceedings and unnecessary harassments by an executive authority acting without jurisdiction. alternative remedies such as are provided cannot always be a sufficient reason for refusing quick relief in a fit and proper case .....

Hindustan Vacuum Glass Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1982]52CompCas421(Delhi); ILR1980Delhi969; 1980RLR718

..... limited(hindustan), is an 'undertaking' within the meaning of section 20(a)(ii) of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969(the act).(2) number of preliminary objections were raised by the covernment. but finally the union of india agreed to have a ^^^(..111from this court on the question whether hindustan is a memopolyhouse.(3) hindustan ..... 1). the evil of this concentration of power is that it givesrise to a position of dominancy and a necessary corollary of this wasthe exclusion of others from the trade.section 20(a) says : '20.this part shall apply to (a)an undertaking if the total value of (i)its own assets, or (ii)its ..... speak, so manyhyphens that join, so many buckles that bind two or more undertakingsas to bring them within the concept of 'inter-connected undertakings'envisaged by the act. in all these inter-connections one sees the indicia of monopolisation, attempts to monopolise, and the maintenanceof a monopolistic position. all three of these characteristics are .....

Bharti Cellular Limited Vs. Department of Tele-communicaitons

Court : Delhi

..... in this clause shall apply in respect of matters relating to (a) the monopolistic trade practice, restrictive trade practice and unfair trade practice which are subject to the jurisdiction of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission established under sub-section (1) of section 5 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969 (54 of 1969); (b) the complaint of an individual consumer maintainable before ..... exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute between the parties. reference was made to the decision of the supreme court in union of india v. tata teleservices (maharashtra) ltd. (2007) 7 scc 517, the decision of the tdsat in aircel digilink india ltd. v. union of india (2005) 3 comp lj 461 (tdsat), the decision dated 22nd january 2010 of the tdsat in m .....

Lalita Kumari Vs. Govt.of U.P.and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , viz. tapan kumar singh (supra), bhagwant kishore joshi (supra), p. sirajuddin (supra), sevi (supra), shashikant (supra), rajinder singh katoch (supra), vineet narain vs. union of india (1998) 1 scc226 elumalai vs. state of tamil nadu 1983 lw (crl) 121, a. lakshmanarao vs. judicial magistrate, parvatipuram air1971sc186 state of uttar pradesh vs ..... three-judges in lalita kumari vs. government of uttar pradesh & ors. (2012) 4 scc1wherein, this court, after hearing various counsel representing union of india, states and union territories and also after adverting to all the conflicting decisions extensively, referred the matter to a constitution bench while concluding as under:- 97. ..... emphasized that giving a literal interpretation would reduce the registration of fir to a mechanical act. parallelly, he underscored the impact of article 21 on section 154 of the code by referring to maneka gandhi vs. union of india (1978) 1 scc248 wherein this court has applied article 21 to several provisions .....

Poona Employees Union Vs. Force Motors Limited and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... so that in the month of january, 2003, it had in its fold 1973 employees members. claiming that it was a union registered under the trade unions act, 1926 (for short, hereinafter to be referred to as 1926 act ) on 20.7.1986 with a valid certificate to that effect, it asserted that with the exodus of the employees members ..... been left blank. a perusal of form no.1 in which annual returns are to be submitted by a registered trade union in terms of the bombay trade unions regulations, 1927 framed under section 29 of the 1926 act reveals that the blank columns refer to: number and date of receipt for payment of application fee; number of members ..... and obligated by it in order to determine the eligibility-cum-suitability of a union contending for the status of recognized union under the statute.37. as the preamble of the act would testify, it is one to provide for the recognition of trade unions for facilitating collective bargaining for the undertakings visualised therein and amongst others, to .....

Forbes Forbes Campbell and Co. Ltd. Vs. M.G. Chitale

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR1; 1977MhLJ869

..... manufacturing rectified power plants and other electrical items. on december 15, 1975, respondent no. 2 (engineering mazdoor sabha, a trade union registered under the trade. unions act, 1926, representing workers in engineering industry/trade in greater bombay) filed an application in the prescribed form (being mrtu no. 39 of 1975) for registration as a recognised ..... commencement or continuation of a strike which is deemed to be illegal under this act; or(vi) that its registration under the trade unions act, 1926, is cancelled; or(vii) that another union has been recognised in place of a union recognised under this chapter.it will appear very clear that section 13 sets out ..... the total number of employees employed in the undertaking. further the expression 'union' occurring in that section must be a union as defined in section 3(17), that is to say, must be a trade union registered under the trade unions act, 1926 and secondly the minimum 30 per cent, membership spoken of by that section .....

M.R. Patil and Another Vs. the Member, Industrial Court and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC1429; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)932; 1997(3)ALLMR(SC)726; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)858; 1997(2)Crimes20(SC); JT1997(4)SC428; (1997)IILLJ417SC; 1997(3)SCALE363; (1997)4SCC545; [1997]3SC

..... that payment in terms thereof would be unjust and more favourable to the workers affiliated to the other unions, the union filed a complaint before the industrial court, amaravati under section 28(1) of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 ('act' for short) and, along with it, filed a petition seeking temporary relief. on that complaint, which was ..... appeal.9. to answer the questions raised in this appeal it will be pertinent to refer, at the outset, to the preamble of the act and its material provisions. the act was brought on the statute book :to provide for the recognition of trade unions for facilitating collective bargaining for certain undertakings, to state their rights and obligations; to confer certain powers on unrecognised .....

The Planters Association of Tamil Nadu. Vs. the Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

..... for deletion of section 18 of the pl act. a progressive labour enactment even if enacted by the parliament, the implementation of the same depends upon the level of consciousness of workers of a particular state, the collective pressure that can be exercised by the working class including their trade unions. merely because the provision had not been notified ..... can issue a writ in the nature of mandamus to the central government to bring section 30 of the act into force. dealing with a similar question a constitution bench of this court in a.k. roy v. union of india2 has taken the view that a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the central government ..... implemented. all welfare activities were undertaken through established methods even at times some of the unions have opposed to bring into force of the act.9. the second objection was that under section 43(3) of the pl act, all rules made under this act, if made by any government other than the central government, will be subject to the .....

Asbestos Kamgar Union Vs. Asbestos Janata Mazdoor Union and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ1103MP; 1995(0)MPLJ171

..... .4. after hearing counsel, this court is of the opinion, that the petition has no merit for reasons to follow. chapter iii of the act deals with the recognition of representative unions and associations of employers. any registered trade union desirous of its recognition as a representative union in respect of any industry in a local area, has to apply under section 13 of the ..... . dubey, j.1. petitioner is a registered trade union which has been organised as a representative union under section 13 of the m.p. industrial relations act, 1960 (for short the 'act') for the employees in respect of the industry eternit everest ltd., kymore. the respondent no-1 in form e of rule 17 and section 17 of the act applied before the registrar of representative .....

J. Mitra and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kesar Medicaments and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT198; 2008(102)DRJ106; LC2008(2)1; 2008(36)PTC568(Del)

..... same can be challenged before the high court on various grounds in infringement proceedings. this position is expressly provided by section 13(4) of the said act. again in standipack private ltd. and ors. v. oswal trading co. ltd and ors. 1999 ptc (19) 479 (del), learned single judge (as he then was) noted that the delhi high court has ..... held in an infringement act relating to a patent, the plaintiff has to make a prima facie case about the existence of a monopoly right and its ..... on against the validity of the patent, without any substantial or patentable variation having been made, he had a good defense'114. in gillette safety razor co. v. anglo american trading co. ltd, vol. 30., reports of patent, design and trademark cases p. 465, lord moulton observed as under:i am, thereforee, of opinion that in this case the .....