Section 252 - Judgment Search Results

P. Ugender Rao and ors. Vs. J. Sampoorna and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1990CriLJ762

..... against the natural conclusion which must follow from the reading of sections 203 and 294 but would be contrary to sections 252 and 253 cr p c themselves the magistrate thus cannot discharge ..... dealt with the petition is accordingly allowed 8 petition allowed criminal validity of charges sections 203 204 220 244 245 246 252 253 1 and 253 2 of criminal procedure code 1973 petition under .....

Devendra Kumar JaIn and anr. Vs. State (Delhi Administration) and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 38(1989)DLT213

..... c unequivocally lays down that except for cases where the accused can be convicted under section 252 or section 253 the magistrate shall proceed to hear the prosecution and take all such evidence ..... similarly now unless accused pleads guilty in the manner contemplated by sections 252 and 253 of the code the provisions of section 254 make it clear that the trial is to proceed this .....

J. Muthukrishnan and anr., Etc. Vs. the State

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1990CriLJ2570

..... situations namely trial of a case initiated upon police report section 251 a and trial of cases instituted otherwise than on police report sections 252 to 257 if a special judge is enjoined with ..... the notification to try the following offences namely a an offence punishable under section 161 section 162 section 163 section 164 section 165 or section 165a of the indian penal code act xiv of 1860 or .....

The State of Gujarat Vs. Lalit Mohan

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1990CriLJ2341; (1989)2GLR230

..... procedure when not convicted 1 if the magistrate does not convict the accused under section 252 or section 253 the magistrate shall proceed to hear the prosecution and take all such evidence as ..... the accused guilty pass sentence upon him according to law 3 a magistrate may under section 252 or section 255 convict the accused of any offence triable under this chapter which from the .....

Price Waterhouse Vs. Hopkins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... distinctions or differences in treatment or favor which are prohibited by section 704 are those which are based on any five of the ..... induced petitioner to deny respondent partnership pp 490 u s 239 252 b conventional rules of civil litigation generally apply in title vii ..... principles in arlington heights v metropolitan housing corp 429 u s 252 1977 a case which like this one presented the problems of .....

Goldberg Vs. Sweet

Court: US Supreme Court

..... ridge colorado ordinance no 630 1985 los angeles california ordinance no 162586 1987 footnote 5 section 4 states in part a tax is imposed upon the act or privilege of originating ..... sweet no 87 826 argued october 12 1988 decided january 10 1989 488 u s 252 appeal from the supreme court of illinois syllabus in light of recent technological changes creating .....

Union of India Vs. Northern Plastics Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1992(61)ELT74(Del)

applications being cm 4405 88 cm 5180 88 and cm 252 89 for the release of various items of photographic material

Kasturi Radha Krishnan Vs. the Hon'ble President of India, Govt. of In ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1990Mad216

tndiav basavaiah 1979 3scr802 is the term legislature in art 252 1 does not include governor that is all so these

Hernandez Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of scientology are religious organizations entitled to receive tax deductible charitable contributions under the relevant sections of the code this stipulation isolated as the sole statutory issue whether payments for auditing ..... connection with auditing or training sessions specifically cf united states v lee 455 u s 252 455 u s 257 1982 any burden imposed on auditing or training therefore derives .....

Murray Vs. Giarratano

Court: US Supreme Court

..... b q 8 provides in pertinent part b in any post conviction proceeding under section 2254 or 2255 of title 28 united states code seeking to vacate or ..... id at 351 u s 18 accord burns v ohio 360 u s 252 1959 20 fee to file appeal the principles articulated in griffin soon were ..... 296 1989 interpreting act of july 20 1892 ch 209 1 27 stat 252 now codified at 28 u s c 1915 d similarly congress at first .....