Section 252 - Judgment Search Results

Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal Vs. Saty ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC917; 1981CriLJ341; 1981(1)SCALE179; (1981)2SCC109; [1981]2SCR661

..... b the procedure for trial would therefore be under section 252 of the crpc and not under section 251 a in respect of prosecution under section 252 of the crpc there is no compulsory provision ..... for giving copies of documents referred to under section 173 and the opposite parties are not therefore .....

Venkatakrishna Rice Company Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1987]163ITR129(Mad)

..... by the income tax officer to the appellate assistant commissioner section 252 provides a further appeal to the tribunal against the orders ..... costs counsel s fee rs 500 direct taxation assessment sections 147 246 252 263 and 264 of income tax act 1961 whether ..... productivity aspect of taxation the jurisdiction of the commissioner under section 263 is undoubtedly a supervisory jurisdiction it is intended .....

Pravinkumar Lalchand Shah Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1982)1GLR116

..... governed by the procedure under sections 252 to 259 and as these sections do not contain any provision similar to section 173 4 for furnishing ..... 1966 involved the procedure under section 252 of the cr p c and onwards and not under section 251 a of the criminal ..... forwarded to the magistrate with the police report under sub section 5 section 173 provided that the magistrate may after perusing any such .....

Needle Industries (India) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Needle Industries Newey (I ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1298; (1982)1CompLJ1(SC); 1981(2)SCALE959; (1981)3SCC333; [1981]3SCR698

..... companies act such amendments have been made in sections 174 1 clause iii of the second proviso to sub section 1 of section 220 and section 252 1 in order to accord separate treatment to ..... private companies which become public companies by virtue of section 43a as distinguished from .....

Mohd. Ramzan (Katu) Bhat Vs. State

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 1981CriLJ1212

..... the c j m had to follow the procedure laid down under section 252 cri p c and had to proceed in accordance with that ..... raised i may quote with benefit the following two sub section of section sub section 4 the charge shall be then read and explained to ..... judicial magistrate was sufficient compliance with the provisions of sub section 3 of section 364 cr p c 20 the expression that the certificate .....

S.K. Mahajan and Etc. Vs. Municipality

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 1982CriLJ646

..... s evidence without complying with the mandatory provisions of sub section 2 of section 252 turning down the request of the accused to appear as ..... his own witness under section 342 a or refusing to hear ..... the cher will be final order re visable under sub section 1 of section 397 their lordships observed 1978crilj165 one of the tests is .....

Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1981)22CTR(Kar)91; [1981]6TAXMAN264(Kar)

orderchandrakantaraj urs j 1 petitioner hindustan aeronautics limited is an assessee under the it act 1961 hereinafter referred to as...

Texas Dept. of Commun. Affairs Vs. Burdine

Court: US Supreme Court

reasons for the plaintiff s rejection pp 450 u s 252 256 page 450 u s 249 b the court of

Michael Vs. U.S.

Court: US Supreme Court

it were assumed to constitute a search 645 f 2d 252 1981 it held that reasonable suspicion is adequate to support

Piper Aircraft Co. Vs. Reyno

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for damages are governed by the damages scotland act 1976 footnote 4 section 1404 a provides for the convenience of parties and witnesses in ..... by foreign plaintiffs against american manufacturers pp 454 u s 248 252 b nor may an analogy be drawn between forum non conveniens ..... the case on grounds of forum non page 454 u s 252 conveniens where dismissal might lead to an unfavorable change in law .....