Section 252 - Judgment Search Results

Panna Lal Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1969All123; 1969CriLJ354

..... the applicants their trials should have been under section 251 a 252 and not under section 252 251 a of the code of criminal ..... question however remains whether they should have been tried under section 252 or section 251 a as the magistrate actually did 11 in case ..... cross examination which would have been available to them under section 252 and that therefore the conviction of the applicants is liable .....

Ngounipu Kabui Vs. Lungbujei Kabui and ors.

Court: Guwahati

..... he thinks necessary thus it is the duty of the magistrate under section 252 2 cr p c to ascertain from the complainant or otherwise the ..... discharge the accused if upon taking all the evidence referred to in section 252 cr p c and on making such examination if any of the ..... examined all the witnesses for the prosecution as per the list under section 252 2 cr p c and framed the charge then there are no .....

Raghubans Dubey Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC1167; 1968(16)BLJR25; 1967CriLJ1081; [1967]2SCR423

..... criminal procedure code must be followed if it falls in ii or iii then the procedure under section 252 criminal procedure code must be followed we are thus concerned to find out whether the report of ..... but it does not include the report of a police officer see section 4 1 h it therefore follows that section 252 criminal procedure code can only apply to those cases which are instituted otherwise .....

The State Vs. Ganesha and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1968Raj116; 1968CriLJ648

..... report against ratiram the learned magistrate should have proceeded against him only in accordance with section 252 cr p c and he was not justified in taking proceedings against him in accordance ..... officer consequently they had to examine the position as to whether a case to which section 252 cr p c properly applies could be tried according to the procedure laid down by .....

Sunilakhya Chowdhury Vs. H.M. Jadwet and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1968Cal266,1968CriLJ736

..... may be produced in support of the prosecution under section 244 1 and section 244 2 and section 252 2 cr p c shows the ample powers ..... then the discretion which the legislature has given to the magistrate in section 252 2 cr p c would be utterly empty 11 the next ..... that would have the effect of abolishing section 252 2 of the code the provisions contained in section 204 are not absolute and can in .....

Jagabandhu Behera Vs. Kshetrabasi Samal and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1968Ori26; 34(1968)CLT786; 1968CriLJ205

..... this case is clubbed with the aforesaid case when provisions under section 252 cr p c will be followed summon witnesses to 8 8 ..... unless other requirements are complied with the provision of sub section 1 of section 173 permits filing of an appeal against an award within ..... of limitation embodied in the substantive provision of the sub section 1 of section 173 of the act does not extend to the provision .....

State Vs. Munafkha Lukmankha Musalaman

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1968Bom311; (1968)70BOMLR69; 1968CriLJ1054

..... would be vitiated the entire argument therefore depends upon the question whether the procedure under section 252 of the criminal procedure code should have been followed by the learned magistrate 6 the contention ..... would determine whether a case should proceed under the procedure specified under section 251 a or under section 252 in respect of offences which are not provided for in the penal .....

KilgarlIn Vs. Hill

Court: US Supreme Court

..... mr speaker as a result of the analyzing and briefing of section 26 article iii of the texas constitution of 1876 and the ..... whether the state policy necessitates the range of deviations evident here 252 f supp 404 reversed in part and remanded per curiam ..... except those provisions respecting the counties included in 11 floterial districts 252 f supp 404 which were found violative of the equality .....

HackIn Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

at 371 u s 443 see also johnson v avery 252 f supp 783 784 d c m d tenn some

Entsminger Vs. Iowa

Court: US Supreme Court

s 20 again in burns v ohio 360 u s 252 1959 the court in reaffirming the griffin rule held that