Section 252 - Judgment Search Results

Rewa Shanker Vs. Mangilal and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1955CriLJ1545

..... complainant to file the list of witnesses is ordinarily sufficient compliance with the provisions of section 252 2 and unless the prosecution has disclosed the names of any witnesses before an accused ..... peculiar circumstances of the case it is riot possible to hold that the provisions of section 252 2 were strictly complied with the complainant was therefore not debarred from examining fur her .....

Pandyan Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. K.J. Khambatta and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1955Bom241; (1955)57BOMLR186; 1955CriLJ1039; ILR1955Bom443

..... of misconduct otherwise than in the course of a formal investigation into a shipping casualty section 252 treats the master mate or engineer against whom there is any charge as an accused ..... the central government under the act before the court can cancel or suspend the certificate section 252 requires the court to give the officer concerned full opportunity of making a defence either .....

Rewa Chand Vs. the State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1955Raj113; 1955CriLJ1106

..... has examined all the witnesses for the prosecution in the list under section 252 2 and has then framed a charge sheet in my opinion ..... refer only to those witnesses who as required by clause 2 of section 252 have been named by the complainant and summoned by the magistrate before ..... bennet j observed as follows it appears to me that under section 252 2 the complainant is required to give in a list of .....

Satyanarayan Singh Vs. State of Hyderabad

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1955CriLJ951

..... rejected the argument or the counsel oi the accused that under section 252 2 criminal p c the magistrate must examine the important witness ..... magistrate cannot be held to be erroneous for the power under section 252 2 criminal p c is not intended for the purposes of ..... insured and insurer held the language employed in enacting sub section 2 of section 149 appears to be plain and simple and there is .....

Barmura Lalung and anr. Vs. Jara Singh Hazarika

Court: Guwahati

..... is laid down thatif upon taking all the evidence referred to in section 252 and making such examination if any of the accused as the magistrate ..... under clause d clause e clause f or clause g of sub section 1 of section 260 the value of tie property in respect of which the ..... under clause d clause e clause f or clause g of sub section 1 of section 260 the value of tie property in respect of which the .....

Fpc Vs. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the project for determining surplus earnings in accordance with the provisions of section 10 d of the act for the establishment and maintenance of ..... under state law requires clear authorization pp 347 u s 249 252 e the plan of the federal water power act is one ..... or condemnation there is no purpose expressed page 347 u s 252 to seize abolish or eliminate water rights without compensation merely by .....

Michigan-wisconsIn Pipe Line Co. Vs. Calvert

Court: US Supreme Court

..... highest court of the state in which a decision could be had another section of the article cited required the supreme court to give its reasons for ..... must pay its way postal telegraph cable co v richmond 249 u s 252 249 u s 259 1919 western live stock v bureau of page 347 ..... texas footnote 1 cf western union tel co v priester 276 u s 252 1928 footnote 2 tex laws 1951 c 402 xxiii footnote 3 the two .....

Watson Vs. Employers Liab. Assur. Corp., Ltd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... injury occurred within the state of louisiana it is the intent of this section that any action brought hereunder shall be subject to all of the ..... or his or her heirs in a direct action as provided in section 655 of this title whether the policy of insurance sued upon was ..... to impair the obligation of contracts munday v wisconsin trust co 252 u s 499 252 u s 503 had the policy sued on been issued in .....

Dhondhey Prasad Vs. Sewak and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1954All739

334 d and lachman das v chaturbhuj das 28 all 252 e in which it was held that it was not

Miller Brothers Co. Vs. Maryland

Court: US Supreme Court

..... permit nor been authorized by the comptroller to collect any use tax under section 312 of article 81 of the annotated code of maryland 1947 supp 12 ..... license fee required to obtain nor has been issued a license pursuant to sections 331 333 of article 81 of the annotated code of maryland 1947 ..... district 145 u s 1 shaffer v carter 252 u s 37 travis v yale towne mfg co 252 u s 60 see also haavik v alaska .....