Section 252 - Judgment Search Results

Premraj Vs. the State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1952Raj55

..... warrant case to follow the procedure laid down in sections 252 to 256 the provisions of this section are mandatory there are two sub sections of section 252 according to subsection 1 the magistrate is bound to ..... case i e at any time before the finishing of the evidence referred to in section 252 under section 256 the accused will be provided with an opportunity of further cross examining the .....

Balu Ram Vs. the State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1950CriLJ1512

..... held by a full bench of the lahore high court that the pro visions of section 252 2 criminal p c are mandatory and a magistrate must ascertain names of all the ..... court that this man might be examined at that stage the application was moved under section 252 and 540 criminal p c there should therefore be no difficulty in treating the application .....

State Vs. Ghulam Mohiuddin

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1951All475

..... such evidence as was produced in support of the prosecution section 252 criminal p c consequently when at the commencement of or during the ..... any thing or person and which may be relevant under section 9 evidence act the facts are to be proved according to ..... simple ghulam mohiuddin is being prosecuted for an offence punishable under section 188 penal code when he appeared before the city magistrate .....

Bijai Raj and anr. Vs. the State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1950CriLJ1063

..... persona desired to be summoned are necesary witnesses this is exactly what section 252 2 criminal p c lays down and what the trial court has ..... trial court allowing the prosecution to file a supplementary hat of witnesses section 253 2 criminal p c is quite dear in the matter and ..... 208 also lays down that the power given to the magistrate under section 262 2 may be exercised from time to time as the .....

Rampal Vs. Mangia

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1952Raj60

..... the names of his witnesses and of summoning them vide section 252 and after recording the prosecution evidence if he considers that ..... charge he cannot dismiss the case for default the only section which deals with the procedure upon default of appearance of ..... accused so desire to re cross examine the prosecution witnesses section 256 requires that the witnesses named by the accused shall .....

Maryland Vs. Baltimore Radio Show

Court: US Supreme Court

of the supreme court bridges v california 314 u s 252 pennekamp v florida 328 u s 331 and craig v

Fpc Vs. East Ohio Gas Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... orders here primarily rest on commission regulations pursuant to the following sections section 6 b authorizes the commission to require a natural gas ..... as exemplified in pennsylvania gas co v public service comm n 252 u s 23 the latter service interstate to local distributing ..... to state regulation see pennsylvania gas co v public service commission 252 u s 23 1920 there is no intention in enacting .....

Cassell Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for such cause shall be fined not more than 5 000 footnote 21 section 5 the congress shall have power to enforce by appropriate legislation the ..... petitioner was indicted there were 21 grand juries in this period of the 252 members of the panels footnote 9 17 or 6 7 were negroes ..... texas constitution art 5 13 harper v state 90 tex cr r 252 234 s w 909 footnote 4 texas code of criminal procedure vernon .....

Skelly Oil Co. Vs. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... administrative discretion to decide when an order may fairly be deemed to have been issued section 16 of the act provides that orders of the commission shall be effective on the ..... towne v eisner 245 u s 418 with his dissent in eisner v macomber 252 u s 189 252 u s 219 parties do not necessarily endow statutory language in a contract .....

American Communications Assn. Vs. Douds

Court: US Supreme Court

..... act as amended by the labor management relations act 1947 footnote 1 this section commonly referred to as the non communist affidavit provision reads as follows ..... u s 377 or sometimes extremely serious bridges v california 314 u s 252 314 u s 263 1941 and it follows therefrom that even harmful ..... v united states 251 u s 466 1920 pierce v united states 252 u s 239 1920 gitlow v new york 268 u s 652 .....