Section 252 - Judgment Search Results

Gokulsing Bhikaram Pardeshi Vs. Kisansing Guru Laxmangir

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1910)12BOMLR539

..... decide the question of representation or refer the parties to a separate suit section 244 last paragraph under section 252 the decree holder could attach and sell the property of the legal representative ..... decide the question of representation or refer the parties to a separate suit section 244 last paragraph under section 252 the decree holder could attach and sell the property of the legal .....

Treacher and Co. Ltd. Vs. Mahomedali Adamji Peerbhoy

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1910)12BOMLR597

and chimerical and the observations of the court at page 252 of the report are i think a complete answer to

Doyal Chandra Das Vs. Chunilal Addy and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 7Ind.Cas.815

jur 694 morland v cooke 1888 l r 6 eq 252 austerberry v oldham 1835 29 ch d 750 53 l

Holt Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

were taken to the admission and page 218 u s 252 sufficiency of evidence the first is merely an attempt to

St. Louis, Kansas City R. Co. Vs. Wabash R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

f 546 joy v st louis page 217 u s 252 138 u s 1 and 81 c c a 643

Wright Vs. Georgia R. and Banking Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the fifth eighteen hundred and fifty and for other purposes the first section of that act provides that the georgia railroad and banking company and ..... rochester railway co v rochester 205 u s 236 205 u s 252 while an exemption from taxation enjoyed by a corporation which acquires the ..... rochester r co v rochester 205 u s 236 205 u s 252 mr justice moody after reviewing all of the cases referred to above .....

Durga Dutt Joshi Vs. Ganesh Dutt Joshi and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 5Ind.Cas.400

..... a friend or a gift at nuptials does not appertain to the heirs chap i section 4 clause 118 this rule is explained by yajnavalkya to mean that the phrase anything ..... lordships of the privy council in pauliem valoo chetty v pauliem sooryah chetty 1 m 252 4 i a 109 in the course of which a similar contention was stated to .....

Central Trust Co. Vs. Central Trust Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to determine to whom it should be delivered page 216 u s 260 sec 645 par 4 attempts to secure the mail of an established house firm ..... 634 and pars 4 and 5 645 of postal laws and regulations provide sec 634 par 3 when a postmaster is in doubt as to the ..... june 22 1906 the central trust company a corporation page 216 u s 252 engaged in the mining promoting real estate and trust business filed its bill .....

Hara Krishna Mitter and anr. Vs. Ram Gopal Mitter

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 6Ind.Cas.170

..... an application was made on the 21st july 1908 by earn gopal mitter imder section 523 of the code of 1882 to have the agreement filed in court ..... award made by an arbitrator appointed by the court in a proceeding under section 523 of the code of 1882 tt appears that on the 24th january ..... lords president v van reenen 1 knapp p c 83 12 e r 252 caledonian railway co v lockhart 3 macqueen h l 808 6 jur n .....

Herndon Vs. Chicago, R.i. and Pac. Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... this act shall include the term railway company and railway corporation sec 2 inasmuch as the train service is very inconvenient and unsatisfactory ..... by the general assembly of the state of missouri as follows sec 1 if any foreign or nonresident railway corporation of whatever kind ..... the state of missouri and at an assessed value of 3 252 775 the bill sets out the various particulars wherein it is .....