Refusing - Judgment Search Results

Ravi Agrawal Vs. Anil Kumar Verma

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2010(1)AWC461

..... is dated 30 7 2002 it is stated that notice was refused by refusal on the same day and suit was instituted thereafter therefore ..... not served and finding of the courts below that it was refused by tenant petitioner is not substantiated by evidence besides notice was ..... tendered by money order or was deposited in the court after refusal besides there is also concurrent finding on the question of material .....

Arya Mitter and anr. Vs. Harbans Lal and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2009)156PLR510

k kannan j 1 the ground on which the tenant was evicted was that the first respondent had sub let...

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Peoples Union for Civil Liberties, Kerala ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(9)SC573; 2009(10)SCALE25; (2009)8SCC46

s b sinha j issue1 effect of a writ of or in the nature of mandamus issued by a high...

B. Raghavendra Rao @ Raghu S/O B.S. Rama Rao Through the Next Friend, ...

Court: Karnataka

k l manjunath j 1 this is a claimant s appeal the claim petition was filed by sri b raghavendra...

Beard Vs. Kindler

Court: US Supreme Court

..... offenses the united states sought kindler s return but an extradition treaty allowed canada to refuse to hand over anyone likely to face execution see kindler v canada minister of justice .....

Zindar Ali Sk Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2009SC1467; 2009CriLJ1324; 2009(2)SCALE248; (2009)3SCC761; 2009AIRSCW948

..... several times forcibly and had also falsely assured to marry her however the accused refused to marry the complainant prosecuterix and therefore the prosecuterix informed the incident to her ..... would be sufficient sections 417 376 cheating accused wanted to marry prosecutrix on her refusal committed forcible sexual intercourse with her prosecutrix specifically deposed that subsequently also she was .....

M/S Lek Pharmaceuticals D.D. Vs. the Assistant Controller of Patents a ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... an opportunity of being heard 15 power of controller to refuse or require amended applications etc in certain cases where the ..... act or of any rules made thereunder the controller may refuse the application or may require the application specification or other ..... the technical objections mentioned therein the application for patent is refused under section 15 of the act the correct procedure should .....

Yahoo! Inc (Formerly ‘overture Services Inc.’), a Delaware C ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... on consideration of the statement and evidence filed by the applicant the controller may either refuse to grant a patent on the application or require the complete specification to be ..... further simultaneously either rejecting the representation and granting the patent or accepting the representation and refusing the grant of patent on that application ordinarily within one month from the completion .....

Barratt Homes Limited (Respondents) Vs. Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig (Welsh Wa ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... it would overload the system upstream of manhole so29127901 they claimed a statutory right to refuse connection at this point offering instead connection at manhole so29127901 an option that would ..... objectionable to construe the statute in such a way as to preclude an undertaker from refusing a connection that would have potentially deleterious environmental consequences in the leading judgment of .....

R Vs. C (Respondent) (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Div ...

Court: House of Lords

..... leading to dangerously low haemoglobin levels she knew that if she refused a blood transfusion she might die nevertheless she believed that ..... kind of compulsion which drives a person with anorexia to refuse food the delusions which drive a person with schizophrenia to ..... to prove the prosecution has only to prove the inability to refuse rather than that the complainant actually did not consent this .....