Refusing - Judgment Search Results

Mati Lal Shah Vs. Chandra Kanta Sarkar and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1947Cal1

chakravartti j 1 this rule was issued by henderson j sitting singly who directed it to be heard by a...

Kumar Singh Chhajor and Others Vs. Emperor

Court: Privy Council

sir john beaumont this is an appeal by special leave from an order of the high court of judicature at...

Dickinson and Co. Vs. Bristow.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1946]14ITR38(Cal)

lord greens m r the point raised by this appeal is one which might fairly be described as singularly devoid...

Durga Sankar Sukul and ors. Vs. Prafulla Chandra Nag and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1947Cal294

k c chunder j 1 this appeal is by the plaintiffs against a decree of the subordinate judge 4th court...

Godavarthi Venkanna Vs. Godavarthi Venkatanarayana

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1947Mad49; (1946)2MLJ193

alfred henry lionel leach c j 1 the appellant is the defendant in the action which has given rise to...

Kumar Singh Chhajor Vs. Emperor

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1947)49BOMLR227

john beaumont j 1 this is an appeal by special leave from an order of the high court of judicature...

Mohammad Mohy-ud-dIn Vs. Emperor

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1946)48BOMLR740

patrick spens kt c j 1 this is an appeal against an order of a full bench of the lahore...

Kotteakos Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

kotteakos v united states 328 u s 750 1946 u s supreme court kotteakos v united states 328 u s...

Santosh Das Gupta Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1947Cal179

..... indicated in these instructions then they had sufficient cause for refusal and their refusal did not amount to a contravention of section 9 ..... by the central or the provincial government without sufficient cause refuse to sell any article within the limits as to quantity ..... the purchase of records the dealers are however authorised to refuse to sell under section 9 of the hoarding and profiteering .....

Estep Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... criminal prosecution under the selective training and service act of 1940 for willfully failing and refusing to submit to induction a registrant who appeared at the induction center and was finally ..... been improperly denied exemption from service because the classifying agencies acted arbitrarily and capriciously in refusing to classify him as iv d he also claimed that his right to an effective .....