Refusing - Judgment Search Results

inspecting Assistant Vs. Paliwal Glass Works

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)20ITD50(Delhi)

1 these are two departmental appeal directed against the order of the commissioner appeals agra and relate to the assessment...

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Kailash Basudeo Prasad Tiwari and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1992(0)MPLJ775

b m lal j 1 this judgment shall also govern the disposal of the connected criminal appeal no 639 of...

Smt. K. Aruna Kumari Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC227; 1988CriLJ411; 1987(3)Crimes741(SC); 1988(43)ELT4(SC); JT1987(4)SC378; 1987(2)SCALE1121; (1988)1SCC296; [1988]1SCR973; 1988(1)LC103(SC)

..... accused was after prosecutrix requesting her to marry him prosecutrix deposed that on her refusal accused committed forcible sexual intercourse with her subsequently also for 2 3 days she ..... would be sufficient sections 417 376 cheating accused wanted to marry prosecutrix on her refusal committed forcible sexual intercourse with her prosecutrix specifically deposed that subsequently also she was .....

City of Houston Vs. Hill

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 3 1982 eight months after the lawsuit began hill was arrested for refusing to leave the immediate area of a car with an unknown ..... thereof he f congregates with other persons in a public place and refuses to comply with a lawful order of the police to disperse ..... charged with such crimes as failure to remain silent and stationary remaining refusing to remain silent and talking 789 f 2d 1103 1113 1114 .....

Societe Nationale Vs. District Court

Court: US Supreme Court

..... dilatory and expensive system of letters rogatory or letters of request other countries have refused adequate judicial assistance because of the absence of a treaty or convention regulating the ..... that an american court s order ultimately requiring discovery that a foreign court had refused under convention procedures would constitute the greatest insult to the sovereignty of that tribunal .....

iCC Vs. Locomotive Eng'rs

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 701 a 2 which precludes judicial review of action committed to agency discretion by law refusals to reopen have traditionally been reviewed only when new evidence or changed circumstances are alleged ..... 296 1974 more importantly for present purposes all of our cases entertaining review of a refusal to reopen appear to have involved petitions alleging new evidence or changed circumstances that rendered .....

Ricketts Vs. Adamson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... meaningless first degree murder charges could not be reinstated against respondent if he categorically refused to testify after sentencing even if the agreement specifically provided that he would so ..... question whether an insurance company s notification to a policyholder that it would henceforth refuse to continue paying disability benefits constituted a breach of the contract the court ultimately .....

Director-general of Vs. Hindustan Lever Limited

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1989)66CompCas51NULL

..... practice pressed at the time of hearing is the respondent s refusal to deal with its redistribution stockist 54 before dealing with this ..... conceived in monopolistic purpose or market control even an individual s refusal to deal may violate the statute 55 in the enquiry ..... trade practice of termination of stockistship of one stockist and resultant refusal to deal with him is concerned it could be argued .....

United Paperworkers Vs. Misco, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... appeals erred in setting aside the arbitral award on public policy grounds a court s refusal to enforce an arbitrator s interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement is limited to situations ..... court does not reach the issue upon which certiorari was granted whether a court may refuse to enforce an arbitration award rendered under a collective bargaining agreement on public policy grounds .....

Goodman Vs. Lukens Steel Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... practices in failing to challenge lukens discriminatory discharges of probationary employees in failing and refusing to assert instances of racial discrimination as grievances and in tolerating and tacitly ..... of harassment which were indisputably racial in nature and that the unions had regularly refused to include assertions of racial discrimination in grievances that also asserted other contract .....