Refusing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: refusing Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 4,216 results (0.036 seconds)Shri D.A. Gadgil Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-30-2003
Reported in: (2003)48SCL480SAT
1 order passed by the chairman securities and exchange board of india the respondent herein on 24 10 2002 under...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRavi Shekhar Bhardwaj and ors. Vs. Director General of Police, State o ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-16-2003
Reported in: I(2004)ACC320; 2003(4)ALLMR57; 2003(6)BomCR493; 2004(2)MhLj213
c k thakker c j 1 public interest litigation no 87 of 2001 was filed in this court on august...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Government Pensioners Association Vs. State of A.P. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALD338
g bikshapathy j 1 the lis is voiced by the retirees interregnum the petitioners are the state government pensioners association...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVijay Kumar Vs. Tara Chand
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-19-2003
Reported in: (2003)134PLR340
..... with rule of law as a necessary corollary thereto state cannot refuse to confirm highest bid without assigning any valid reason and or ..... hands of state violates fundamental rights of a citizen or its refusal to enter into a contract is contrary to statutory provisions ..... with rule of law as a necessary corollary thereto state cannot refuse to confirm highest bid without assigning any valid reason and or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDy. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports Vs. Roshanlal Agarwal and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-05-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC1900; 2003CriLJ1698; 2003(155)ELT216(SC); JT2003(2)SC370; 2003(2)SCALE636; (2003)4SCC139; [2003]2SCR621; 2003(2)LC1029(SC)
g p mathur j 1 the deputy chief controller of imports and exports filed eightcomplaints against several persons including the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Kedar Sao and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-25-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC3650; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)670; 2003CriLJ4903; JT2003(7)SC276; 2003(6)SCALE639; (2004)9SCC344
d raju j 1 special leave granted in s l p c nos 1140 1141 of 1998 2 common and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssya Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-13-2003
Reported in: 2004(3)KLT54
orderr basant j 1 does the criminal court exercising jurisdiction under the provisions of the muslim women protection of rights...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr. Bharat Shantilal Shah, Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-05-2003
Reported in: 2003BomCR(Cri)947; (2002)1BOMLR527
..... on bail for anyother offence the object of the act being to preventorganized crime the refusal of bail to an offender whocommits an offence under the act while on bail for ..... 5 say thatnotwithstanding anything contained in the code suchpersons shall not be granted bail the refusal forconsideration of grant of bail merely because theperson is on bail for some other offenceunconnected .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPawan Deep Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-07-2003
Reported in: AIR2004P& H106; (2004)136PLR587
..... in the afore mentioned section were attracted in his case thus refusal to grant passport is not only violative of the fundamental ..... to the other provisions of this act the passport authority shall refuse to issue a passport or travel document for visiting any ..... in the counter affidavit no other infirmity has been disclosed justifying refusal to grant passport by respondent no 2 respondent no 2 has .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRohit Packaging Industries and Vs. Dena Bank
Court: DRAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2003
Reported in: III(2003)BC62
..... they have purposely avoided summons in this case also by refusing notices therefore this contention of the respondent cannot be accepted ..... notices were addressed to the very same address and were refused by the appellants the learned presiding officer was justified in ..... against the appellants defendants on the ground that they have refused to receive the notice and therefore the appellants are deemed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial