Refusing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: refusing Year: 1962 Page 1 of about 978 results (0.041 seconds)Hariram Dhalumal Karamchandani Vs. Jasoti
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-15-1962
Reported in: AIR1963Bom176; (1962)64BOMLR712; ILR1962Bom554
1 the applicant hariram has filed this application against the order of the assistant judge nagpur in civil appeal no...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Gujarat University, Ahmedabad Vs. Krishna Ranganath Mudholkar and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-21-1962
Reported in: AIR1963SC703; (1963)GLR450(SC); [1963]Supp1SCR112
..... citizens or any minority religious or linguistic we must however make it clear that we refuse to decide the question not because the petitioner had no right to maintain the petition .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSankatha Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-25-1962
Reported in: AIR1962SC1208; [1962]Supp2SCR817
..... accused was after prosecutrix requesting her to marry him prosecutrix deposed that on her refusal accused committed forcible sexual intercourse with her subsequently also for 2 3 days she ..... would be sufficient sections 417 376 cheating accused wanted to marry prosecutrix on her refusal committed forcible sexual intercourse with her prosecutrix specifically deposed that subsequently also she was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Hai Azimullah Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, U. P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-17-1962
Reported in: [1963]49ITR586(All)
..... of the act could be made only within six months of the date of the refusal made under section 66 1 of the act by the tribunal and inasmuch as the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHutcheson Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-14-1962
..... relating to the termination of the lake county grand jury proceedings sawochka basing his refusal on the fifth amendment privilege against self incrimination and sullivan invoking the attorney client ..... cases establish that possible self incrimination under state law is not a ground for refusing to answer questions in a federal inquiry accordingly the fifth amendment privilege against self .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRussell Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-21-1962
..... which the committee acted and the questions which the petitioners refused to answer the subject matter of the investigations had been stated ..... to legitimate congressional inquiry stemming from the belief that a refusal to answer may somehow be requited in this court and it ..... of congress willfully makes default or who having appeared refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry shall .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. A.M. P. Meerasahib Tharaganar and Bros. Vs. Commissioner of Income ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-14-1962
Reported in: [1963]48ITR950(Mad)
..... section 26a the assessee challenged the correctness of the order of the income tax officer refusing registration before the appellate assistant commissioner urging the ground that as the firm was genuine ..... learned chief justice that section 23 4 clothes the authority with an overriding power to refuse registration notwithstanding the fact that conditions laid down in rule 4 had been complied with .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Police Vs. Lakshmi Chand Gupta
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-11-1962
Reported in: AIR1962Cal556,66CWN487
..... accordingly required to show cause why his application for renewal of licence should not be refused the respondent complied with this requisition and showed cause denying the allegation that such ..... in the orders of thecommissioner of police we would still think the ordersmade by him refusing license were valid the predominantconsideration related to the two conditions prescribed in section 39 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBurlington Truck Lines, Inc. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-03-1962
..... but the unions themselves would be vulnerable footnote 21 and the pressures which generated the refusals to serve might well be effectively removed these intervening facts so changed the complexion of ..... to say that circumstances can never permit the commission to authorize additional service to remedy refusals to serve but the commission must act with a discriminating awareness of the consequences of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaker Vs. Carr
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-26-1962
..... has since 1901 purposefully retained unequal districts and the supreme court of tennessee has refused to invalidate the law establishing these unequal districts kidd v mccanless 200 tenn 273 292 ..... the same allocation of senators and representatives as was established by statute in 1901 refusing to recognize the great shift in the population balance between urban and rural communities that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial