Refusing - Judgment Search Results

Parwat and 3 ors. Vs. Keshao Trimbak Jahagirdar and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1973Bom262; 1973MhLJ451

masodkar j 1 this appeal has been field by the original defendants against the judgment of a single judge of...

Oyami Ayatu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1974SC216; 1974CriLJ305; (1974)3SCC299; 1973(5)LC802(SC)

..... accused was after prosecutrix requesting her to marry him prosecutrix deposed that on her refusal accused committed forcible sexual intercourse with her subsequently also for 2 3 days she ..... would be sufficient sections 417 376 cheating accused wanted to marry prosecutrix on her refusal committed forcible sexual intercourse with her prosecutrix specifically deposed that subsequently also she was .....

Rajinder Singh Vs. the State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1974Delhi277

..... result was announced he had a row with bids father and left as his father refused to support him any longer he could not even get a job on account of ..... the intervention of his father his father refused to become separate from him the appellant left delhi for meerut where his friend narinder .....

Otter Tail Power Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... attack in an antitrust proceeding the district court determined that otter tail s consistent refusals to wholesale or wheel power to its municipal customers constituted illegal monopolization otter ..... tail maintains here that its refusals to deal should be immune from antitrust prosecution because the federal power commission .....

Lefkowitz Vs. Turley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... licensed architects when summoned to testify before a grand jury investigating various criminal charges refused to sign waivers of immunity whereupon various contracting authorities were notified of appellees conduct ..... that they waive their immunity and by disqualifying them as public contractors when they refused it seems to us that the state intended to accomplish what garrity specifically .....

Schneckloth Vs. Bustamonte

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a prerequisite to police interrogation indeed in language applicable to the typical consent search we refused to extend the need for warnings our decision is not intended to hamper the traditional ..... agents of the federal bureau of investigation have routinely informed subjects of their right to refuse consent when they request consent to search note consent searches a reappraisal after miranda v .....

United States Vs. Pennsylvania Indus. Chem. Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the exclusive authority to permit discharges of pollutants into navigable waters footnote 3 the refuse matters were identified as iron aluminum and compounds containing these chemicals and chlorides phosphates ..... govern the transportation and dumping into navigable waters of dredgings earth garbage and other refuse matter whenever in his judgment such regulations are required in the interest of .....

United States Vs. Scrap

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the same and landfill space is even now becoming harder and harder to find refuse disposal and refuse recovery charts appear on pp 718 and 719 respectively charts omitted page 412 ..... electrostatic separation and gravity concentration all proven methods used in the minerals industries other refuse recycling schemes have been proposed and some are already under development the process developed .....

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... power of legislation as far back as 1865 section 2 refused to put limitations of vague character like general principles of ..... the colonial legislatures the british parliament as far back as 1865 refused to put limitations of vague character but limited those limitations ..... for its own amendment the president of the united states refused to recognize de jure a government established under a new .....

Musser Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... simple answer to this contention is that no matter what the boards apparent motivations in refusing to reopen the petitioners classifications may have been the boards were simply without power to ..... had entered the army in may 1969 under circumstances where his local draft board merely refused to reopen his classification because his asserted views crystallized subsequent to the receipt of his .....