Present Value - Judgment Search Results

Mr. Jayant Kumar Tiwari Vs. Present for the Department Mr. V. Palanive ...

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

applicant filed application under section 245r 2 of the income tax act 1961 seeking advance ruling on the following question

M/S. Sopropha S.A. Vs. Present for the Department Mr. S.M.J. Abidi, Ad ...

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

risk of raw materials or merchandise in stock falling in value the loss arising as a result of such forward sales

State of Manipur Represented by Under Secretary (Works) and the Under ...

Court: Guwahati

ranjan gogoi j 1 as common questions of facts and laws are involved in theseappeals they are heard and decided...

Shri M. Thaimon Singh S/O (L) M. Radheshyam Singh and ors. Vs. Shri L. ...

Court: Guwahati

p p naolekar c j 1 as common questions of facts and laws are involved in theseappeals they are heard...

Hindustan Lever Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act Vs ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 114(2004)DLT394; [2005(104)FLR673]; (2005)ILLJ453Del

the issues whether the o p is maintainable in its present form or is otherwise with merit or not are not

Khemchand Agrawal Vs. Commissioner, Irrigation, Presently Designated a ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 97(2004)CLT237

respondents did not comply with said order hence petitioner filed present application for contempt of court against respondent after expiry of

Dinesh Shantilal Bhatt Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... liable to confiscation on the ground that market value was less than the draw back 3 in spite of notice the applicant is not present hence we heard the ld dr and ..... that exports garments were over invoiced and the applicant and others have admitted that the value of the exported goods was only about rs 3 to 4 lakhs the goods have .....

Sargodha Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(167)ELT519TriDel

in my view stands attracted to the facts of the present case detailed above the penalty could be imposed only for

Parasrampuria Synthetics Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT327TriDel

upon by the learned advocate are not applicable in the present matter as the facts are completely different for instance in

Sipani Automobiles Ltd. Vs. Cc (Appeals)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC347

..... on this presumption is a rebuttable one the appellants in the present matter has produced a certificate dated 24 12 96 from the ..... absence of these details overhead is permitted 10 of the total value of the imported materials and they would stand to gain a ..... under the impugned order rejected their appeal on the ground that value of parts and components doss form parts of their finished product .....