Present Value - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: present value Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 579 results (0.21 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. Anchor Pressing (P.) Ltd.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-02-1981
Reported in: (1982)26CTR(All)447; [1982]136ITR505(All)
as there are in the corresponding sections of the income tax act no penalty could be imposed for failure to file
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Orissa Vs. R.C. Sahoo
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-24-1981
Reported in: AIR1981Ori140
of the court after rejecting the objection raised by the present appellant there was an agreement relating to construction of road
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Utkal Machineries Ltd.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Feb-02-1981
Reported in: 51(1981)CLT260; [1981]131ITR650(Orissa)
reversal in the second appeal the revenue has raised the present dispute 3 a bench of the allahabad high court in c j 1 the bombay bench b of the income tax appellate tribunal has under section 256 1 of the i
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHimansu Majumdar Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-17-1981
Reported in: 53(1982)CLT483; [1982]51STC33(Orissa)
very material feature to take notice of in resolving the present dispute the pertinent aspect for examination is whether prior to entry 60 would cover what was herebefore in entry 47 added to this came the gazette publication of 17th november 1961
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Harish Chandra Gupta
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Feb-02-1981
Reported in: 51(1981)CLT285; [1981]132ITR799(Orissa)
by which blending takes place in the year preceding the present assessments the department had accepted the assessee s status to t act of 1961 this court called upon the income tax appellate tribunal cuttack bench to state a case and refer
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD. Rahaman Vs. Bijaya Kishore Das
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-06-1981
Reported in: 51(1981)CLT179; [1982]136ITR855(Orissa)
it has been satisfactorily proved that the accused was not present when exs 1 and 2 were filed before the i be false with a view to avoid payment of lawful tax it is also alleged that the accused deliberately suppressed the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuresh Kumar Moharana and ors. Vs. Brundaban Barik and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-01-1981
Reported in: AIR1981Ori203; 52(1981)CLT181; [1983]54CompCas264(Orissa)
of section 110 d i would accordingly hold that the present appeal is not maintainable 6 the next question for consideration the supreme court in the case of commissioner of income tax v chenniappa mudaliar air 1969 sc 1068 in the supreme
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGorapalli Paradeshi Vs. Hindustan Chains Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-13-1981
Reported in: AIR1981Ori149
was no properly represented through anybody as such and at present the decree holder cannot substitute the name of g paradeshi
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Orissa Vs. B.N. Agarwala
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-20-1981
Reported in: AIR1981Ori124; 52(1981)CLT37
state of orissa v rama chandra sahu 6 in the present case the arbitrator allowed interest 6 from the due date
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJugal Kishore Bajoria Vs. Republic of India
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-24-1981
Reported in: 52(1981)CLT225; 1981CriLJ1369
..... go to show that the defence now taken is an after thought in the present case during the course of his examination the accused did not take the plea ..... petitioner s firm iftthncut 770 kgs of orange oil valued at rs 18 480 and 225 kgs of lemon oil valued at rupees 6 525 were sold to one ..... per ext 48 1 625 kgs of orange oil valued at rs 15 060 and 160 kgs of lemon oil valued at rs 4 640 were old to one .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial