Present Value - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: present value Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 601 results (0.216 seconds)The Life Insurance Corporation of India, Southern Zone, Represented by ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-1998
Reported in: (1998)2MLJ551
..... of the lower appellate court the 2nd defendant has filed the present second appeal before this court while entertaining the second appeal ..... the suit the entry in the horoscope has no evidentiary value more particularly when the transfer certificate relating to the plaintiff ..... person concerned may not be given any importance the evidentiary value of the horoscope has been expressed by this court in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Gurunanak Steel and Allied Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-1998
Reported in: (1998)(103)ELT430TriDel
of the order passed by the subordinate officers in the present cases the commissioner had issued the directions for filing the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTapex Corporation Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-1998
Reported in: (1998)(103)ELT580TriDel
and these include self adhesive tapes of plastics in the present case the appellants had submitted before the authorities below that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat Communications and Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-04-1998
Reported in: (1998)LC295Tri(Mum.)bai
the commissioner of central excise appeals ahmedabad leading to the present appeal 3 after hearing shri s d gohil the learned
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBuildwell Machines (India) Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-01-1998
Reported in: (1999)(114)ELT627Tri(Mum.)bai
before the lower appellate authority we therefore dispose of the present appeal itself with a direction that the appellant be heard
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunrays Engg. (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-02-1998
Reported in: (1999)(113)ELT541TriDel
same line of reasoning upheld the denial resulting in the present appeal before me 2 shri j s agarwal ld advocate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMetal Mfg. Co. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-1998
Reported in: (1999)(105)ELT205TriDel
..... therefore the extended period has been rightly invoked in the present case 4 we have considered the rival submissions we find ..... that all the relevant information namely the value of clearance under separate chapter heading has been clearly shown ..... the description of goods under different tariff headings and the value of clearances as against each chapter heading therefore the charge .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRanko Refrigeration Company Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-01-1998
Reported in: (1998)(77)LC705Tri(Mum.)bai
penalty by the buyers in identical circumstances therefore in the present case also we dispense with the pre de posit of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-1998
Reported in: (1998)(104)ELT62TriDel
..... the earlier interpretation the successor benches can take a different view 19 in the present case the department has given the details of the manufacturing process and uses which have ..... act as a binding precedent but are required to be treated as having a persuasive value and if new facts come to light or there are other reasons to differ from .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajasthan State Ganganagar Sugar Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-09-1998
Reported in: (1999)(111)ELT652TriDel
air conditioning system as admissible inputs the inputs in the present case being on similar lines do qualify rule 57a to invoice shri tilak ld dr suggests that they were later added it is correct that the consignee s excise registration number
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial