Present Value - Judgment Search Results

Collector of Customs Vs. Lalit Mehta

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1991)(55)ELT95Tri(Chennai)

..... away from belgaum in terms of section 11 c 3 of the act in the present case the evidence on record clearly bears out that the letter of authorisation dated 2 ..... under invoice no 1057 dated 1 12 1987 1800 mts of fabrics of foreign origin valued at rs 1 00 540 the goods in question were intercepted by the customs authorities .....

Cable News Network, Inc. Vs. Noriega

Court: US Supreme Court

united states district court for the southern district of florida presented to justice kennedy and by him referred to the court

K.S. Vohra Vs. Director General of Border Security Force

Court: Guwahati

security force but surprisingly after about 11 or 12 years present decision of resumption of the enquiry has been taken up

Fmc Corp. Vs. Holliday

Court: US Supreme Court

erisa footnote 3 these were rejected in favor of the present language in the act indicat ing that the section s b 29 u s c 1144 b 2 b emphasis added like the court of appeals respondent would interpret the deemer

Vickers Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a competent psychiatrist who will conduct an appropriate examination and assist in evaluation preparation and presentation of the defense emphasis added the right to a competent psychiatrist necessarily includes the ..... 78 79 1094 finally the arizona high court maintained that further testing was of questionable value to petitioner s insanity defense and that the risk of an erroneous judgment was .....

Swindler Vs. Lockhart

Court: US Supreme Court

court nonetheless denied the motion on the basis of the present arkansas law and the record that was made during jury

Smith Vs. Dugger

Court: US Supreme Court

the state courts for a determination whether those factors were present 481 u s at 158 in this case the court

Delvecchio Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

the prosecution of a 1965 murder charge against the defendant presented an unacceptable appearance of partiality the court has previously considered

House Vs. Tennessee

Court: US Supreme Court

circumstances id at 374 the jury instructions in this case present the same impermissible risk after charging the jury that it as heretofore indicated any mitigating circumstances id at 3 emphasis added the form provided to the jury for recording a death

Asman Ali Laskar Alias Jamir UddIn Vs. Forjan Ali Barbhuiya

Court: Guwahati

not been fulfilled that is not the case in the present appeal in the notice served on the defendant it was