Present Value - Judgment Search Results

Dennis Vs. Denver and Rio Grand Western R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

was covered by the instructions to the jury in the present case but as i read the record there is no

State of Gujarat Vs. Shantaben Wife of Bhol Dhulabhai

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1964Guj136; 1964CriLJ32; (1964)0GLR578

..... furnish if hg had been examined as a witness in the present case the report merely says that wheat products had been used ..... judgment of the allahabad high court in air1933all837 which has no value after the amendment of section 510 criminal procedure code and my learned ..... factual and does not consist of any opinion it has its value because the chemical analyser and the public analyst are qualified .....

Ramla Vs. Gyarsa

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1964Raj69

on the i4th of july 1955 thereupon ramla brought the present suit making gyarsa and three minor sons sagra and others

B.M. Kharwar Vs. Ramanlal Motiram

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1964)5GLR701

..... it in appeal the district court confirmed this order and hence this present revision application 2 there is a finding of both the courts ..... under section 35 of the evidence act and they have evidentiary value it was therefore open to the courts below to consider such ..... under section 35 of the evidence act and they have evidentiary value it was therefore open to the courts below to consider such .....

Jadeda Meramanji Pragji and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1963CriLJ713; (1964)GLR263

order and rejected the revision application before him hence the present revision application before the high court 2 section 196 a

Jayanti Luxman Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1964CriLJ86; (1964)GLR648

evidence and without appreciating evidence which is recorded in the present case the learned magistrate was not right in accepting the

Kamalashanker Bhuleshanker Dave Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1963CriLJ611

narayanlal s case 1961 1scr417 to the facts of the present case it is clear that when the assistant registrar of

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Hiralal Devji and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1964Guj261; 1964CriLJ676; (1964)0GLR255

in our view so far as the facts of ihe present ease are concerned the provisions of section 145 evidence act

State of Gujarat Vs. V.L. Vakharia

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1964Guj125; 1964CriLJ666; [1966(12)FLR343]; (1964)10GLR29

of the inspector it was barred by limitation hence the present appeal by the state 2 section 106 of the factories

Ram NaraIn Vs. Lt. Col. Hari Singh and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1964Raj76

engagement in order to appreciate the question whether in the present case there is adequate consideration or not it will be