Preferential - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: preferential Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 100 results (0.012 seconds)Brown Vs. Entertainment Merchants Assn.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-27-2011
brown et al v entertainment merchants assn et al syllabus october term 2010 brown v entertainment merchants assn supreme court...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTidbi Ltd. Vs. the Official Liquidator.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-07-2011
..... the official liquidator and to bear their own costs companies act 1956 section 529a overriding preferential payment the official liquidator submitted his report being olr no 26 of 2005 seeking permission .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSomashekara Rao, Hiriadka and Another Vs. the Canara Land Investment L ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-19-2011
..... of the company including the petitioners 8217 interest would have been seriously affected 35 the preferential share capital is defined under section 85 of the companies act which reads as under ..... for the respondents submitted to the court that the company is willing to allot 2000 preferential shares to the petitioners group and hereinafter they shall send notice and all other communications .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Kalpena Plastiks Limited Vs. the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Nov-09-2011
..... intimated the bse that the appellant would proceed with the preferential allotment of shares under the presumption that the bse ..... indefinite period the company went ahead with the allotment of preferential shares under intimation to bse presuming that clause 24 ..... on issues like the appellant going ahead with allotment of preferential shares without first obtaining in principle approval under clause 24 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTintermedia Cable Communication Pvt. Ltd, Pune Vs. Complete News and En ...
Court: Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Decided on: Jul-18-2011
..... agreement of distributorship so far as placement of the channels of the first respondent on preferential frequencies is concerned in that capacity the respondent no 2 approached petitioner to put the ..... wrong and therefore denied it is denied that the petitioner placed the respondents channel on preferential frequency it is denied that petitioner raised any bill to the respondent that contents of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTamilnadu State Electricity Board, Chennai Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity ...
Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Decided on: Mar-17-2011
..... of cost of electricity therefore procurement by distribution companies shall be done at preferential tariffs determined by the appropriate commission 8221 27 accordingly the state commission has ..... of cost of electricity therefore procurement by distribution companies shall be done at preferential tariffs determined by the appropriate commission 2 such procurement by distribution licensees for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH.N. Veerabhadrachar Vs. the Bangalore Development Authority, by Its C ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-13-2011
Reported in: 2012(3)KCCR2127
..... in section 43 of the pwd act are extracted hereinbelow 43 schemes for preferential allotment of land for certain purposes the appropriate governments and focal authorities shall ..... and impairments section 43 casts are obligation upon appropriate governments to formulate schemes for preferential allotment of lands and houses to benefit persons with disabilities further parliamentary recognition .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.Balarama Raju, and ors. Vs. Ch. V. Subramanya Sarma, and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-26-2011
..... far as the three appellants are concerned their appointments were purely temporary and without any preferential claim to the future re promotion or seniority and they were liable to reverted they ..... year the order dated 7 11 2000 further stated that their appointments are without any preferential claim to future re promotion or seniority these three appellants did not obtain the necessary .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Leela Devi and anr Vs. Bijay Prasad and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Mar-09-2011
..... in the property or business the other heirs shall have a preferential right to acquire the interest proposed to be transferred 2 ..... her interest in the property the other heirs shall have a preferential rights to acquire the interest proposed to be transferred we ..... learned court below has rightly held that the plaintiffs have got preferential right over the stranger non mentioning of the provision of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAugustine Kujur Vs. State of Orissa and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-19-2011
..... present writ petition knowing fully well that similar prayers made by others in past concerning preferential employment under the ldp category have been negatived by this court earlier in a writ ..... commercially viable therefore the opposite party company is no more in a position to provide preferential employment to family members of local displaced persons in their second and third generation in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial