Preferential - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: preferential Year: 1936 Page 1 of about 23 results (0.02 seconds)In Re: Peninsular Life Assurance Co. Ltd. (In Liquidation.)
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-08-1936
Reported in: AIR1938Bom91
..... the question whether claimant no 51 is entitled to rank as a preferential creditor the company in liquidation did only life assurance business a ..... act 6 of 1912 he is entitled to rank as a preferential creditor that contention is opposed by the other creditors of the ..... a right was given to the policy holders to rank as preferential creditors barring section 6 there is no other section which refers .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. Vs. Rhodes
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-02-1936
..... but 50 percent of their claims respondent alleged that the above mentioned pledges and the preferential payments were unlawful the defendants the comptroller of the currency and the receiver of ..... again recognizing the general rule reiterated its view that the particular circumstances showed that the preferential payments in question were made at the instance and with the approval of the comptroller .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaltimore and Ohio R. Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-18-1936
..... was inefficiency in operation by the former which rendered its share noncompensatory or the seemingly preferential treatment of the latter might be justified by the fact that it was the originating ..... or for services are as between him and competing shippers fair or whether they constitute preferential treatment determination under paragraph 15 of 1 of the fair amount payable by one carrier .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: the Katni Cement and Industrial Co. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-16-1936
Reported in: AIR1937Bom423; (1937)39BOMLR675
..... the memorandum of association of the company and entitled the holders to a fixed cumulative preferential dividend at the rate of seven per cent per annum on the capital for the ..... the ordinary and deferred shares the second preference shareholders were entitled to a fixed cumulative preferential dividend at the rate of seven per cent per annum on the capital for the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Ratna Mudaliar (Deceased) and Four ors. Vs. Krishna Mudaliar and an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-24-1936
Reported in: (1937)1MLJ390
..... correct and confine myself to the question whether the plaintiff can claim to be a preferential heir even as against kunjan s daughter s son 6 it will be noticed that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOfficial Assignee Vs. Trustees of Port Trust
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-01-1936
Reported in: AIR1936Mad789; 166Ind.Cas.427
..... admitted the port trust only as unsecured creditors and did not allow their claim to preferential payment the port trust therefore by notice of motion prayed that this order of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Bengal Vs. Mercantile Bank of India, Ltd. ...
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: May-20-1936
..... a resolution that any sum not required for the payment or provision of any fixed preferential dividend and a for the time being standing to the credit of any reserve fund .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagannath Rao Vs. Rambharosa and Another
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: May-15-1936
..... the maratha caste not only that but poor boys of my caste shall have a preferential right seven years time has been allowed for adoption but if vyenkat rao naik rao .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTi.M. Ratna Mudaliar and anr. Vs. Krishna Mudaliar and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-24-1936
Reported in: AIR1937Mad353; 171Ind.Cas.760
..... correct and confne myself to the question whether the plaintiff can claim to be a preferential heir even as against kunjan s daughter s son 6 it will be noticed that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMarimittath theruvil Moothachettiam Veettil Kelu Vs. Kuitiyil Machikan ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-10-1936
Reported in: 172Ind.Cas.47
..... one is in possession who can represent or continue his possession or who is entitled preferentially to possession and therefore he becomes entitled and it is necessary and his duty if .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial