Preferential - Judgment Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Rajesh P.U., Puthuvalnikathu and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC4222; [2004(1)JCR130(SC)]; 2003(3)JKJ26[SC]; 2003(3)KLT392(SC); 2003(5)SCALE560; (2003)7SCC285; 2004(1)SLJ306(SC)

..... 43 62 k g balakrishnan c j p sathasivam jj p i l scheme for preferential allotment of land for certain purposes to disabled handicapped persons pil filed for proper implementation ..... whenever state governments or local authorities allot land for various purposes indicated in seciton 43 preferential treatment must be given to disabled persons and land to be given at concessional rates .....

Krishna Vs. Sanjeev

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2003KAR3716

..... prayer sought for pursuant to the notification issued under rule 59 1 of the rules preferential right of certain persons in the light of rule 35 of mineral concession rules consideration ..... that are required to be considered under section 11 3 of the act and the preferential right of certain persons in the light of rule 35 of the mineral concession rules .....

Dr. Rajaratan Basavanneppa Ghanti and anr. Vs. Chandrasekhar Mahadevap ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2003KAR2123; 2003(4)KarLJ329

..... captive mining leases to steel manufacturing industries in proportion to their respective licensed capacity on preferential basis etc held thus section 11 3 d of the mmdr act specifically contemplates top ..... the industries based on minerals and rule 35 of the m c rules provides for preferential rights of certain persons considering the end use of the mineral by them while mining .....

Sri Gayadhar Panda Vs. the Registrar (Admn.) High Court of Orissa and ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 96(2003)CLT800; 2003(II)OLR473

..... superseded petitioners but standing committee of promotion had not stated any special reasons for giving preferential treatment to opposite party no 2 simply recording statement that opposite party no 2 had .....

S.A. Jayanarayana Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2003CriLJ3245; 2003(4)KarLJ231

..... they belong to linguistic minority legal obligation of the respondent institution to give admission on preferential basis to the candidates belonging to linguistic minorities held it is necessary for the institution .....

The Marimallappa Education Trust Vs. Smt. K.S. Rathnamma and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2003(4)KarLJ229

..... they belong to linguistic minority legal obligation of the respondent institution to give admission on preferential basis to the candidates belonging to linguistic minorities held it is necessary for the institution .....

P.C. Surana Vs. Poonam A. Bamba, Adjudicating

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)44SCL649SAT

..... financial constraints the company was facing and the circumstances necessitating to make the preferential allotment he submitted that in the then prevailing circumstances there was no other ..... disclosures deprived shareholders of complete information before taking a decision to approve such preferential allotment more important that the acquirers admitted having contravened the said regulation after .....

In Re: Hakeem Auto Limited

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... so far as the requirement of sending the board resolution in respect of the proposed preferential allotment to the stock exchange mumbai is concerned the stock exchange mumbai has specifically ..... much before the amendment and therefore it presumed that the aforesaid issue of shares under preferential allotment would fall under exemption category and would not attract the provisions of the regulations .....

Mr. Satyadeva Prakash Sinha, Ms. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)4CompLJ491SAT

..... learned representative submitted that in the instant case the acquisition was by way of preferential allotment and as such enjoyed exemption under regulation 3 that the acquisition under regulation ..... board of india and subject to compliance with relevant provisions of the guidelines for preferential allotment of shares sebi substantial acquisition of shares and takeovers regulation 1997 or any .....

Big Star Films Limited, Aspen Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Ind ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)46SCL754SAT

..... c and because of the failure to fulfil the said precondition the acquisition pursuant to preferential allotment was not considered as an exempted one 5 shri arif bookwala learned counsel appearing ..... accordance with the provisions of section 18 1a of the companies act 1956 for abovesaid preferential allotment to the partners of silicon valley information technology corporation 11 it is clear that .....