Preferential - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: preferential Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 129 results (0.009 seconds)Karnataka Bank Ltd. Vs. Secretary, Government of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-25-2002
Reported in: AIR2003SC2096; [2002]255ITR508(SC); (2002)9SCC106
..... 43 62 k g balakrishnan c j p sathasivam jj p i l scheme for preferential allotment of land for certain purposes to disabled handicapped persons pil filed for proper implementation ..... whenever state governments or local authorities allot land for various purposes indicated in seciton 43 preferential treatment must be given to disabled persons and land to be given at concessional rates .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUttam Kumar (Deceased) Vs. Madhav and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-27-2002
Reported in: 2002ACJ1828; ILR2002KAR1864; 2002(3)KarLJ337
..... captive mining leases to steel manufacturing industries in proportion to their respective licensed capacity on preferential basis etc held thus section 11 3 d of the mmdr act specifically contemplates top ..... the industries based on minerals and rule 35 of the m c rules provides for preferential rights of certain persons considering the end use of the mineral by them while mining .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShiva Kumar T.A. Vs. Smt. Pushpa Rekha
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-21-2002
Reported in: I(2003)DMC119; ILR2002KAR4212; 2002(5)KarLJ393
..... prayer sought for pursuant to the notification issued under rule 59 1 of the rules preferential right of certain persons in the light of rule 35 of mineral concession rules consideration ..... that are required to be considered under section 11 3 of the act and the preferential right of certain persons in the light of rule 35 of the mineral concession rules .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRiyaz Khan and ors. Vs. Modi Mohammed Ismail and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-08-2002
Reported in: AIR2003Kant3; ILR2002KAR3369; 2002(3)KarLJ551
..... they belong to linguistic minority legal obligation of the respondent institution to give admission on preferential basis to the candidates belonging to linguistic minorities held it is necessary for the institution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParekh Platinum Ltd. Vs. the Stock Exchange, Mumbai
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Aug-23-2002
..... at the conclusions 14 learned counsel submitted that diversion of the proceeds of the preferential issue for working capital requirements was only temporary since there was a delay in ..... counsel appearing for the respondent narrated the sequence of the transactions relatable to the preferential allotment made by the appellant shri modi submitted that the respondent noticed various discrepancies .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLuxury Foams Ltd. Vs. Adjudicating Officer,
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Mar-20-2002
..... the provisions of regulation 3 1 c cited above that an acquisition pursuant to a preferential allotments simplicitor will not be eligible for exemption unless the requirements stipulated in clauses ..... not directed against the company for not fulfilling the preconditions so as to qualify the preferential allotment to be exempted since the adjudication is directed against the appellants failure there .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlstom Power Boilers Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India and anr. and Mrs. Da ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-31-2002
Reported in: 2003(4)BomCR202; [2002]112CompCas674(Bom); (2003)2CompLJ210(Bom); [2003]42SCL197(Bom)
..... did not fall in any of the categories the government of india which was the preferential shareholders had assigned those shares to the financial institutions and therefore these institutions had ..... though as secured creditors they had no objection to the scheme as allottee of the preferential shareholders by the government of india they have certain objections objectively speaking any valid objection .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKensigton Investment Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-11-2002
..... of the share holders convened for seeking approval for the preferential allotment the company had requested the exchange to display ..... agencies like registrar of companies rbi stock exchange etc the preferential allotment and the relevant details 54 according to section ..... of the company which is also a party to the preferential allotment in furnishing information and making disclosures to the agencies .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshwIn K. Doshi, Pankaj G. Joshi, Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-25-2002
..... said egm since the institutions objected to the pricing of the preferential issue as extremely unfavourable to the interest of the general ..... not pass the resolution for issuing naked warrants equity shares on preferential basis to tatas that only the general body of the ..... to move such a resolution to issue naked warrants equity on preferential basis to tata group of companies to secure the stability .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.L. Sailova Vs. Pritam Dass and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Nov-27-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)JKJ12
..... the division bench considered the facts and circumstances of case according to him the word preferential has been diluted by making the observations that the original petitioners were to be considered ..... learned single judge while deciding the contempt application has observed as under as already observed preferential basis would in the context of the present case mean giving some advantage to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial