Preferential - Judgment Search Results

Dipak Kumar Biswas Vs. Director of Public Instruction and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC1422; [1987(54)FLR447]; JT1987(1)SC631; (1987)ILLJ516SC; 1987(1)SCALE544; (1987)2SCC252; [1987]2SCR572; 1987(1)LC715(SC)

..... subordinate rules annexure 3 item ii as amended in 1995 post of deputy tehsildar preferential treatment given to direct recruits assistants over promotees on basis of educational qualification ..... held under the amended rule directly recruited assistants were given preferential treatment by making them eligible for promotion as deputy tehsildars on completion of five .....

E. Achuthan Nair Vs. P. Narayanan Nair and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC2137; JT1987(3)SC360; 1987(2)KLT777(SC); 1987(2)SCALE342; (1987)4SCC71; 1987(2)LC482(SC)

..... 43 62 k g balakrishnan c j p sathasivam jj p i l scheme for preferential allotment of land for certain purposes to disabled handicapped persons pil filed for proper implementation ..... whenever state governments or local authorities allot land for various purposes indicated in seciton 43 preferential treatment must be given to disabled persons and land to be given at concessional rates .....

Sharanappa Vs. Yellamma

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1988KAR1257; 1987(2)KarLJ334

..... captive mining leases to steel manufacturing industries in proportion to their respective licensed capacity on preferential basis etc held thus section 11 3 d of the mmdr act specifically contemplates top ..... the industries based on minerals and rule 35 of the m c rules provides for preferential rights of certain persons considering the end use of the mineral by them while mining .....

Vikas Vihar Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 32(1987)DLT229; 1987RLR377

..... allotment made on basis of first come basis said rule not made known to public preferential treatment given to co operative societies of members of parliament allotment vocative of article 14 .....

Seethadevi Vs. Narayana Kamath

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1987KAR1779; 1987(2)KarLJ89

..... they belong to linguistic minority legal obligation of the respondent institution to give admission on preferential basis to the candidates belonging to linguistic minorities held it is necessary for the institution .....

Bangalore Water Supply and Vs. Kantha Chandra

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1987KAR1617

..... they belong to linguistic minority legal obligation of the respondent institution to give admission on preferential basis to the candidates belonging to linguistic minorities held it is necessary for the institution .....

California Fed. S and L Vs. Guerra

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that california state law and the policies of interpretation and enforcement which require preferential treatment of female employees disabled by pregnancy childbirth or related medical conditions are ..... discrimination against pregnant workers the legislative history is devoid of any discussion of preferential treatment of pregnancy footnote 20 beyond acknowledgments of the existence of state statutes .....

Joy Kanta Hira Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court: Guwahati

..... 2 1968 in the matter of general concessions and grant of preferential treatment in matters of settlement of contracts permits fisheries ferries ..... should not also be considered for the purpose of giving preferential treatment if that is not done simply by giving an ..... therefore be no doubt that for the purpose of giving preferential treatment bids which have been rejected as exorbitant excessive or .....

Wimberly Vs. Labor and Indus. Rel. Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... only to prohibit states from singling out pregnancy for unfavorable treatment and not to mandate preferential treatment this is confirmed by both the legislative history and the labor department s ..... or elsewhere in the statute s legislative history that evidences congressional intent to mandate preferential treatment for women on account of pregnancy there is no hint that congress disapproved .....

Jayant Oil Mills Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(12)ECC166

..... filed a refund application claiming re assessment of the goods at preferential rate of duty and also refund of additional duty assistant ..... of customs appeals the appellants claimed refund on two counts viz preferential rate of duty 50 ad valorem and refund of additional ..... should be re assessed to basic customs duty at the preferential rate of duty subject to satisfaction of the assistant collector .....