Preferential - Judgment Search Results

Erappa Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2000KAR4706; 2001(3)KarLJ117

..... captive mining leases to steel manufacturing industries in proportion to their respective licensed capacity on preferential basis etc held thus section 11 3 d of the mmdr act specifically contemplates top ..... the industries based on minerals and rule 35 of the m c rules provides for preferential rights of certain persons considering the end use of the mineral by them while mining .....

Shri VishIn N. Kanchandani and anr. Vs. Vidya Lachmandas Khanchandani ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC2747; 2000(4)ALLMR(SC)688; [2000]102CompCas340(SC); 2000(4)CTC115; [2000]246ITR306(SC); JT2000(9)SC321; (2001)1MLJ1(SC); 2000(II)OLR(SC)528; 2000(5)SCALE592; (2000

..... 43 62 k g balakrishnan c j p sathasivam jj p i l scheme for preferential allotment of land for certain purposes to disabled handicapped persons pil filed for proper implementation ..... whenever state governments or local authorities allot land for various purposes indicated in seciton 43 preferential treatment must be given to disabled persons and land to be given at concessional rates .....

A.V. Ramakrishna Vs. the Managing Director, Karnataka State Road Trans ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2000(5)KarLJ546

..... prayer sought for pursuant to the notification issued under rule 59 1 of the rules preferential right of certain persons in the light of rule 35 of mineral concession rules consideration ..... that are required to be considered under section 11 3 of the act and the preferential right of certain persons in the light of rule 35 of the mineral concession rules .....

C.S. Gurushanthappa Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2000(3)KarLJ37

..... captive mining leases to steel manufacturing industries in proportion to their respective licensed capacity on preferential basis etc held thus section 11 3 d of the mmdr act specifically contemplates top ..... the industries based on minerals and rule 35 of the m c rules provides for preferential rights of certain persons considering the end use of the mineral by them while mining .....

Nilakantarao Nadig Vs. Canara Bank, Sorab Branch, Shimoga District and ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2000Kant185; [2001]106CompCas550(Kar); 2000(3)KarLJ318

..... they belong to linguistic minority legal obligation of the respondent institution to give admission on preferential basis to the candidates belonging to linguistic minorities held it is necessary for the institution .....

Channakeshavaiah Vs. Smt. Lakshmi and Another

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2001CriLJ187; II(2001)DMC314; 2001(3)KarLJ458

..... they belong to linguistic minority legal obligation of the respondent institution to give admission on preferential basis to the candidates belonging to linguistic minorities held it is necessary for the institution .....

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore Vs. Jindal Aluminium Lim ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2000(71)ECC409; 2000LC569(Karnataka); 2000(122)ELT645(Kar); ILR2000KAR3271; 2001(3)KarLJ450

..... they belong to linguistic minority legal obligation of the respondent institution to give admission on preferential basis to the candidates belonging to linguistic minorities held it is necessary for the institution .....

Knb Investments (P) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (2001)79ITD238(Hyd.)

..... appellant companies were engaged in the activities of promoting dr reddys laboratories companies the preferential allotment was made in appreciation of the services rendered by the appellant companies ..... are satisfied with reference to the appellant companies and their acquisition of shares through preferential allotment while explaining the circumstances the learned senior counsel first took us to .....

Knb Investments (P) Itd. Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (2004)89TTJ(Hyd.)561

..... are satisfied with reference to the appellant companies and their acquisition of shares through preferential allotment while explaining the circumstances the learned senior counsel first took us to the ..... its existing shareholders other than the appellant companies the benefit of concessional rate or preferential allotment was not extended to all the shareholders but it was extended only to .....

Knb Investments (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

..... companies were engaged in the activities of promoting dr reddy s laboratories companies the preferential allotment was made in appreciation of the services rendered by the appellant companies in ..... are satisfied with reference to the appellant companies and their acquisition of shares through preferential allotment while explaining the circumstances the learned senior counsel first took us to the .....