Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 2 definitions Page 1 of about 5,019 results (0.189 seconds)

D. Gobaloussamy Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Represented by the Secre ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1969)2MLJ62

..... reference to the three stages or phases of that development. for an appreciation of the argument now presented before us, on the central issue of the vires of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 (xxvi of 1968), it is not necessary to traverse that ground again, but it is essential to recapitulate one or two salient features. as i ..... by means of a brief review of the major features of the constitutional development of the territory, we shall now proceed to the attack on. the vires of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act (xxvi of 1968). since something appears to turn in the arguments on the form of the measure, i shall set forth the entire relevant part of the ..... will be no order as to costs.m. natesan, j.15. 'while in agreement with my lord the chief justice that the challenge to the vires, of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act (xxvi of 1968), is wholly untenable, i add a few words, on one or two aspects, having regard to the strenuous arguments of learned counsel for the .....

Vishwanath Son of Bhika Kolase and Raghunath Son of Bhika Kolase Vs. K ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR1093; 2004(2)BomCR399

..... act, 1929 (19 of 1929).(iv)hindu marriage act, 1955 (25 of 1955) and(v)code of civil procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908). amending act.the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 (26 of 1968).10.csection 2 of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956 also expressly states that the provisions of the act would be in ..... provision, and in particular section 8, cannot be viewed in isolation. if read together the intent of the legislature in this beneficial legislation becomes manifest. ordinarily the law does not envisage a natural guardian of the undivided interest of a hindu minor in joint family property. the natural guardian of the property of a hindu minor, other ..... the statement of objection which are reproduced herein below :statement of objects and reasons 1.this is another instalment of the hindu code and it deals with the law relating to minority and guardianship.2.under the indian majority act, 1875, a person attains majority on his completing the age of 18 years but if before the .....

Govt. Of Nct of Delhi Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... be, apply in relation to the national 40 capital territory, the lieutenant governor and the legislative assembly, as they apply in relation to the union territory of pondicherry, the administrator and its legislature, respectively; and any reference in that article to "clause (1) or article 239a" shall be deemed to be a ..... 239aa for nct of delhi. article 239 applies to all union territories including nct of delhi when read with article 239aa, the way it applies to pondicherry when read with the provision of article 239a. 20 22. shri maninder singh during his submission has referred to various paragraphs of balakrishnan committee report ..... and not mere convenient administrative divisions as both the union and the states have sprung from the provisions of the constitution. after quoting extensively from h.m. seervai's commentary constitutional law of india, he expressed thus: "99. the above discussion thus shows that the states have an independent constitutional existence and they have .....

M.J. Delaflore and anr. Vs. Amir Mohammad and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1970Mad308

..... by reason of the procedure already followed should be respected by virtue of the article 4, section 1 of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 19g8 and that the application of the new law to juridical deeds created under the authority of the french law entails serious inconveniences.'upon this application, the learned subordinate judge of karaikal, who functioned in the place of the tribunal ..... by notification in the official gazette may appoint. thereafter, the parliament enacted the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 (act 26 of 1968) which came into force on 5-9-1968. the pondicherry civil courts act was also brought into force on the same date. section 3(1) of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act extended the various enactments mentioned in part i of the schedule, to .....

Ghousia Begum Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1975Mad345

..... she filed the suit on 2-1-1969. nearly four months after the code of civil procedure, 1908, was extended or made applicable to the union territory of pondicherry by the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968, repealing the french civil procedure code, she had not issued the suit notice as required by section 80 of the civil procedure code. 1908, before filing the suit ..... act."we do not agree with the learned counsel for the appellant that by reason of clause (d) of sub-section (2t of section 4 of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968, and the proviso it was open to the appellant to file the suit without issuing the notice required by section 80 of the code of ..... nicobar islands on the 1st day of august. 1966, with certain modifications, are also in part ii of the schedule to the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968, and they also have been made applicable to pondicherry with effect from 24-5-1968. it cannot be stated that it was open to a party who filed his suit or .....

Venkataraman @ Murali @ Raja, Vs. R. Venugopal and R. Ganesan @ Vinaya ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ348

..... unless and until superseded by anything done or any action taken under the said act.12. section 3 of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 provides extension with amendment of certain laws to pondicherry and the different dates which may be appointed for different provisions of any act and any reference in any such ..... lower court also committed an error that the respondents acquired the right within the meaning of sub-section 2 of section 4 of the pondicherry extension of laws act, 1963.7. the further case of the civil revision petitioners/respondents is that the lower court has overlooked the fact that the ..... mad 32 adaikappa chettiar v. a. natchiar wherein it is observed as follows:(b) pondicherry (extension of laws) act (1969) section 4 - mortgage executed before notaire executable under the french law without recourse to suit - indian enactments extended to pondicherry by the pondicherry (extension of laws) act 1968 section 4(1), (2) - subsequent suit on the mortgage in indian .....

Areva T and D Lightning Arresters Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as Alstom ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ622

..... of the act and therefore the above notification is squarely applicable to the petitioner transaction.9. as per section 3 of the pondicherry [extension of laws] act, 1968. the acts specified in part i of the schedule as they are generally in force in the territories to which they extend and ..... the modifications, if any, specified in the schedule.10. case of petitioner is that indian stamp act is shown in part ii of the schedule of pondicherry [extension of laws act]. modifications mentioned in the above act are pertaining to sections 2[26], 3, 19a, 57 and 75a and a few entries in the schedule ..... above prescribed are fulfilled. case of petitioner is that by combined reading of section 3 and 5 of pondicherry [extension of laws] act, 1968 (for short extension act) would make it clear that indian stamp act was extended to pondicherry with all rules, notifications, orders regulations and byelaws made or issued by the central government under the provisions .....

Shanmugham and Others Vs. Perumal Naicker and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1997Mad178

..... to the preliminary decree in time.9. the main question to be considered in this case is, whether the auction conducted under the french code civil is valid.10. pondicherry extension of laws act, 1968 was passed on 24-5-1968. so far as the code of civil procedure is concerned, it is paid that the same will be made applicable ..... by a learned judge of this court. paragraphs 5 and 6 of the reports, which are relevant for our purpose, read thus :--'prima facie, the two sections of the extension of laws act above referred to, namely, sections 3 and 4 arc repealing and re-enacting provisions. the pre-existing french civil code, which corresponds to the indian civil procedure code, is ..... are to be dealt with by the new procedure.'what i have stated above would show that the problem of interpreting the repealing and saving provision in the extension of laws act cannot be dealt with in a general way. nor can it be dealt with by giving a general direction that for all pending actions the old procedural .....

M. Kadirvelu and Others Vs. G. Santhanalakshmi and Others

Court : Chennai

..... act would not have any application. 35. in the year 1968, a second exercise of a similar nature was undertaken by the parliament and an act known as the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 was passed. under section 3(1) of the said act, the parliament extended the provisions of the acts specified in parts i and ii of ..... legal heir of her parents. 16. on issue no.4, the trial court took note of section 4 of the hindu succession act and the provisions of the pondicherry (extension of laws) regulation, 1963 and came to the conclusion that the plaintiff's father was entitled to 1/3rd of the half share of venugopal pillai and that therefore, the ..... fees. the trial court also recorded a finding that since the plaintiff was the daughter of appasamy (a) tandapany pillai, who died long after the extension of the hindu succession act to pondicherry, the plaintiff was prima facie a class i heir under the hindu succession act and that therefore, she is entitled to claim joint possession in terms .....

Union of India (Uoi), Reptd. by the Chief Secretary to the Government ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1986)1MLJ329

..... the indian majority act, 1875 is one of the enactments specified in part i of the schedule. section 3(1) of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968, further provided that such extension shall be subject to the modifications, if any, specified in the schedule and it is seen from the schedule that nothing in the ..... act extended were inapplicable. section 4(1) of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 repealed other laws in force in pondicherry as and from the coming into force of the act specified in part i of the schedule in pondicherry. the saving under section 4(2) of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968, provided that any right, privilege, obligation ..... be under the french code civil overlooking that the provisions of the indian majority act had been extended to pondicherry with effect from 18.12.1968 by a notification under section 3(2) of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968. according to him, if the provisions of the indian majority act should apply, then .....