Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 2 definitions Page 2 of about 5,019 results (0.165 seconds)

Leo John Vs. Smt. Eugenia Preethi

Court : Karnataka

..... would not have any application.35. in the year 1968, a second exercise of a similar nature was undertaken by the parliament and an act known as the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 was passed. under section 3(1) of the said act, the parliament extended the provisions of the acts specified in parts i and ii ..... , whether the provisions of the hindu succession act was applicable to them, the madras high court considering the fact that, parliament had enacted the pondicherry (laws) regulation, 1963, and the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968. it is only when there is specific mention in the schedule that the provisions of hindu succession act or any other personal ..... this did not make any difference with regard to the applicability of french civil code to renouncants. (j) subsequently, in the year 1968, the parliament enacted pondicherry (extension of laws) 1968 in which the provisions of certain act specified in parts i and ii of schedule were extended to the union territory of .....

Adaikappu Chettiar Vs. Ayesha Natchiar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1975)2MLJ298

..... would not have had the opportunity of dragging on the proceedings for nearly five years and raising the defences which under the french law he could not raise. what section 4 of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 does is not to shut out the erstwhile french citizen from having resort to the indian civil court but to protect ..... substantive right. but the question is whether the holder of a copy of a notarial mortgage deed is confined under the indian law to the remedy which he had under the french law. what section 4 (2) of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 says is that nothing in sub-section (1) shall affect any right, privilege, obligation, etc., acquired ..... way of enforcing the mortgage in an action of this kind is to disregard the nature and amplitude of the saving provisions of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968. i have little hesitation in rejecting this contention of the appellant and in holding that even though |the plaintiff might have had the .....

Gothamchand JaIn Vs. Arumugam @ Tamilarasan

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... limitation act, 1963 does not and cannot arise.13. we may, in this case, refer to the pondicherry (laws) regulation, 1963 (no.7 of 1963) which deals with the regulation to extend certain laws to the union territory of pondicherry. reference may also be made to the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968. by virtue of those legislations, the indian contract act, 1872, the transfer of property ..... and separate period of limitation for cause of action arising under the indian contract act and other related laws.14. pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968, as amended, has adopted several such legislations in the state of pondicherry, but the act which governs limitation is the general law of the land that is the indian limitation act. consequently, it is not article 2262 of the french .....

P. Chandrasekharan Vs. the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu Represented by It ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1974)1MLJ387

..... not elect to be or is not qualified to be, enrolled as an advocate under sub-section (r) shall, notwithstanding the repeal of the relevant provisions of such law by the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968, continued to enjoy the same rights as respects practice in any court or revenue office or before any authority or person and be subject to the disciplinary ..... shall have effect in relation to such persons as if they had not been repealed.that the advocates act, 1961 has been extended to the state of pondicherry is seen from the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968, which contains various schedules which delineate the various acts applicable to that state and one such schedule includes the advocates act of 1961.4. in the .....

Cooppousamy Vs. Alamelu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1988)1MLJ432

..... specified enactments under the regulations extended to that territory, order 5 of the said act could not invoked.14. in conclusion, after referring to the provisions of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968, and that c.p.c. had come into force on and from 1.8.1966 in the union territory of ..... his contention that the same period of limitation as obtaining in other parts of the country will have to be in force, overlooks the constitutional provisions. in making laws for pondicherry territory, several enactments have been made which are different from what are obtaining in other party of the country act 26 of 1968 provides only for the enumerated acts ..... v. antonio : [1979]3scr494 , the provisions of french civil code dealing with the subject of limitation of suits, etc, in force in the union territory of pondicherry is 'local law' and these provisions have to be read into the 1963 act, as if the schedule to the said act is amended mutatis mutandis. this court adopted the same view .....

Candida Justina Vs. Sunderbabu

Court : Chennai

..... code civil, for dissolution of the marriage. though french code was applicable initially at the time of independence, now pursuant to the enactment of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act 1968 (no.26 of 1968), specified in part i of the schedule and part ii of the schedule has been extended to ..... misquoting the provisions in the petition, does not preclude the parties from getting the relief, as per law applicable to them. therefore, the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that ..... pondicherry, subject to the modification, if any specified in the schedule. the indian christian marriage act, 1872 is also found extended to pondicherry. therefore, the divorce act, 1869 is applicable to the parties. .....

Raj Kumar Rai Vs. State

Court : Sikkim

Reported in : 1979CriLJ310

..... is contemplated and can be effected by any action taken under clause (n) in extending laws. but since extension of laws on subjects over which there are existing corresponding laws would result in virtual repealment of those existing laws, it should be held that extension of such laws is not contemplated by the provisions of this clause (n).18. this argument, though ..... of the corresponding arms rules, 1962, and mr. chair dhury has rather built up his argument on & the basis that the sikkim law shall stand repealed by and after the extension of the central law under article 371f (n). mr. chaudhury has developed his argument on the basis of his interpretation of the provisions of the three ..... which can be of assistance in the determination of other cases' or by the observations of shelat, j. in b. shamarao v. union territory of pondicherry : [1967]2scr650 to the effect that:in view of the intense divergence of opinion except for their conclusion partially to uphold the validity of the said .....

B. Shama Rao Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1480; [1967]2SCR650; [1967]20STC215(SC)

..... union territories act (no. 20 of 19 63). under section 18(1) of this act, the legislative assembly was given the power of making laws for the territory of pondicherry in respect of matters enumerated in lists 11 and iii of the seventh schedule to the constitution. in pursuance of this power, the legis- lative ..... that there being a precise policy the delegation was not outside permissible limits. we may at this stage observe that such was not the situation in pondicherry as the pondicherry legislature was at all material times already functioning. indeed, it was in the purported exercise of its legislative function that it sought to extend the madras ..... circumstances, mr. setalvad, appearing on behalf of the respondent. relied on the views of this court expressed in in re the delhi laws act'. 1912, the ajmer-merwara (extension of laws) act 1947, the part c states (laws) act, 1950 (1). in that case, the seven learned judges of this court constituting the 'bench' delivered separate opinions, but .....

Mahalakshmi Vs. P.S Rajeswari Alias Santha Bai

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1979)2MLJ192

..... the settlement of proclamation for sale of the property.4. mr. raghavan, counsel for petitioner contends that after the passing of central act (xxvi of 1968 the pondicherry. (extension of laws) act, 1968)(hereinafter to be referred to as the act), the concept of a mortgage automatically treated as an executable decree had disappeared, and respondents herein can ..... taken in respect of the mortgage deed dated 27th january, 1965 executed by muthukrishnan can be proceeded with even though there has been a change in the law applicable in pondicherry as on date. e.a. no. 694 of 1977 was filed under section 151. civil procedure code, by the judgment-debtor for dismissing the execution petition on ..... dealing with civil procedure code in part ii of the schedule to the act which refers to section 45-a being inserted.4. repeal and saving:(1) any law in force in pondicherry or any area thereof corresponding to any act referred to in sub-section (1) of section 3 or any part thereof (except in so far as .....

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Estate of Late H.R. Goosey (by K.S. Naga ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1974]97ITR193(Mad)

..... act, 1962 (act 49 of 1962), or under article 240 of the constitution of india. since the estate duty act was extended to pondicherry by the taxation laws (extension to union territories) regulation no, 3 of 1963, with effect from april 1, 1963, the charging section 5 of the estate duty ..... either in respect of movable property or immovable property situated in pondicherry in respect of a deceased domiciled at the time of his death in pondicherry. that position had to continue under the public international law. extension of the estate duty act, 1953, to pondicherry was necessary in order to bring these estates of deceased persons ..... regulations for the peace, progress and good government of the union territory of pondicherry until a legislature is created and begins to function in respect of that territory. in exercise of this power under article 240, the president promulgated the taxation laws (extension to union territories) regulation, 1963. this regulation came into force on april .....