Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1969)2MLJ62
..... reference to the three stages or phases of that development. for an appreciation of the argument now presented before us, on the central issue of the vires of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 (xxvi of 1968), it is not necessary to traverse that ground again, but it is essential to recapitulate one or two salient features. as i ..... by means of a brief review of the major features of the constitutional development of the territory, we shall now proceed to the attack on. the vires of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act (xxvi of 1968). since something appears to turn in the arguments on the form of the measure, i shall set forth the entire relevant part of the ..... will be no order as to costs.m. natesan, j.15. 'while in agreement with my lord the chief justice that the challenge to the vires, of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act (xxvi of 1968), is wholly untenable, i add a few words, on one or two aspects, having regard to the strenuous arguments of learned counsel for the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... be, apply in relation to the national 40 capital territory, the lieutenant governor and the legislative assembly, as they apply in relation to the union territory of pondicherry, the administrator and its legislature, respectively; and any reference in that article to "clause (1) or article 239a" shall be deemed to be a ..... 239aa for nct of delhi. article 239 applies to all union territories including nct of delhi when read with article 239aa, the way it applies to pondicherry when read with the provision of article 239a. 20 22. shri maninder singh during his submission has referred to various paragraphs of balakrishnan committee report ..... and not mere convenient administrative divisions as both the union and the states have sprung from the provisions of the constitution. after quoting extensively from h.m. seervai's commentary constitutional law of india, he expressed thus: "99. the above discussion thus shows that the states have an independent constitutional existence and they have .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR1093; 2004(2)BomCR399
..... act, 1929 (19 of 1929).(iv)hindu marriage act, 1955 (25 of 1955) and(v)code of civil procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908). amending act.the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 (26 of 1968).10.csection 2 of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956 also expressly states that the provisions of the act would be in ..... provision, and in particular section 8, cannot be viewed in isolation. if read together the intent of the legislature in this beneficial legislation becomes manifest. ordinarily the law does not envisage a natural guardian of the undivided interest of a hindu minor in joint family property. the natural guardian of the property of a hindu minor, other ..... the statement of objection which are reproduced herein below :statement of objects and reasons 1.this is another instalment of the hindu code and it deals with the law relating to minority and guardianship.2.under the indian majority act, 1875, a person attains majority on his completing the age of 18 years but if before the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... v. amalendu das, (1984) 2 scc436 para 4 :1984. scc (tax) 133; cce v. dunlop india ltd., (1985) 1 scc260 para 5 :1985. scc (tax) 75; state (ut of pondicherry) v. p.v. suresh, (1994) 2 scc70 para 15 and state of w.b. v. calcutta hardware stores, (1986) 2 scc203 para 5].31. wherever stay is granted, a speaking ..... a date not beyond six months of the order of stay so that on expiry of period of stay, proceedings can commence unless order of extension of stay is produced.37. thus, we declare the law to be that order framing charge is not purely an interlocutory order nor a final order. jurisdiction of the high court is not barred irrespective ..... mandatory time-limit may be fixed, the decision may not exceed two-three months normally. if it remains pending longer, duration of stay should not exceed six months, unless extension is granted by a specific speaking order, as already indicated. mandate of speedy justice applies to the pc act cases as well as other cases where at trial stage proceedings .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... that the reference to state in articles 54 and 55 would include 13 air1970sc209741 part f the national capital territory of delhi and the union territory of pondicherry for constituting the electoral college for the election of the president. in shiv kirpal singh (supra), this court did not refer to the decision in advance ..... the majority decision in the 2018 constitution bench judgement rendered a broad interpretation of article 239aa(3)(a) to provide nctd with vast executive and co-extensive legislative powers except in the excluded subjects. a combined reading of the majority opinion and the concurring opinions of justice chandrachud and justice bhushan indicates ..... president would not preclude parliament from enacting legislation in future to override or modify the law enacted by the legislative assembly 20 part c19 the 2018 constitution bench judgment held that the executive power of nctd is co-extensive with its legislative power, that is, it shall extend to all matters with respect .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... would not have any application.35. in the year 1968, a second exercise of a similar nature was undertaken by the parliament and an act known as the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 was passed. under section 3(1) of the said act, the parliament extended the provisions of the acts specified in parts i and ii ..... , whether the provisions of the hindu succession act was applicable to them, the madras high court considering the fact that, parliament had enacted the pondicherry (laws) regulation, 1963, and the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968. it is only when there is specific mention in the schedule that the provisions of hindu succession act or any other personal ..... this did not make any difference with regard to the applicability of french civil code to renouncants. (j) subsequently, in the year 1968, the parliament enacted pondicherry (extension of laws) 1968 in which the provisions of certain act specified in parts i and ii of schedule were extended to the union territory of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... would not have any application.35. in the year 1968, a second exercise of a similar nature was undertaken by the parliament and an act known as the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 was passed. under section 3(1) of the said act, the parliament extended the provisions of the acts specified in parts i and ii ..... , whether the provisions of the hindu succession act was applicable to them, the madras high court considering the fact that, parliament had enacted the pondicherry (laws) regulation, 1963, and the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968. it is only when there is specific mention in the schedule that the provisions of hindu succession act or any other personal ..... this did not make any difference with regard to the applicability of french civil code to renouncants. (j) subsequently, in the year 1968, the parliament enacted pondicherry (extension of laws) 1968 in which the provisions of certain act specified in parts i and ii of schedule were extended to the union territory of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... a bid for designing, supplying, installation, testing and commissioning of high mast signage systems of various heights and types at retail outlets in the state of tamil nadu and pondicherry. 7.1 the tenure of the contract was one year, that is, till 10.1.2008. 7.2 the engagement of ffe was on the rate contract basis ..... . the tenure of the contract was extendable, albeit, with mutual consent by a further period of one year. the provision for extension is made in clause 8 of the special instructions to tenderers/contractor ( sit ). 7.3 the petitioner was required to install 105 signages pursuant to call-up orders ..... arbitration is situated in india (a) in an arbitration other international commercial arbitration, the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute submitted to arbitration in accordance with the substantive law for the time being in force in india; than an (emphasis is mine) 20. before i conclude, i must briefly touch upon the judgments cited by ms. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... case (viii). respondent s firms i.e. m/s philips electronics limited miserably failed to deliver the stores i.e., cardiac catherisation equipment to be installed at zipmer at pondicherry within original d.p. i.e. up to 31st march 1994. however, it was supplied and installed during extended period of d.p. and this fact was even ..... . it is significant to mention that earlier stipulation regarding reserving the right to levy the ld was kept intact while granting even the second extension of dp up to 28th february 1995 vide department s/claimant s letter dated 2nd february 1995 (annexure h ). it is also pertinent to mention here that the ..... and this fact was even admitted by the... respondents themselves. not only this as per claimant s letter dated 3rd may 1994 (annexure d ) whereby the first extension of three months was granted and dp was extended from 31st march 1994 to 16th august 1994 by reserving their right to levy ld for delayed supplied of the stores .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... quashed. attention of this w.p.(c) 10626/2017 page 5 of 12 court was drawn to supreme court s decision in union of india through govt. of pondicherry and another v. v. ramakrishnan and others (2005) 8 scc394wherein it has been clarified that when the tenure of deputation is specified, despite a deputationist not having ..... whichever is earlier. it is true that petitioner s tenure of deputation was extended upto the age of 62 years i.e. upto 19th december, 2019, and the said extension was granted on 16th december, 2015. however, prior thereto, respondent-university vide communication of 4th december, 2015 (annexure-m to short affidavit of petitioner) had written to ..... work, but also on the ground that the tenure of deputation must end on the date of his retirement in his parent department. respondent-university has reconsidered extension of petitioner s deputation tenure on the ground that petitioner s deputation has to be co-terminus on the date of his retirement. there is sound basis to .....
Tag this Judgment!