Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 2 definitions Page 10 of about 5,019 results (0.350 seconds)

The Government of Puducherry Rep. by its Joint Secretary, Department o ...

Court : Chennai

..... of the total quantity of each variety of paddy or rice so transported and shall also obtain separate permit in this behalf from the director of civil supplies, pondicherry in pondicherry region and the regional executive officer, karaikal in karaikal region, as the case may be. " 7. pursuant to the communication from the government of india, ..... .06.2010, notifying the amendment to clause 4 of levy order increasing from "ten percent" to "fifty percent". the request of the government of puducherry for extension of delivery of single boiled levy rice for kms 2009-10 for two months beyond 30th september 2010 and the rates, as per the enclosed provisional cost sheet ..... without reasons. in the g.o, revoking the incentive, public interest is shown as predominant reason. we do not see any arbitrariness or violation of rule of law in revoking the incentive. 22. learned counsel appearing for the respondents pointed out that in the impugned order, it is mentioned that incentive to the millers under .....

Rajesh Kumar Gupta Vs. National Council for Teacher Education and Ors ...

Court : Delhi

..... parent department nor the petitioner suffers any loss in any manner if the deputationist employer or respondent no.1 after completion of the tenure period, does not seek extension of tenure of the deputation of the petitioner. this court cannot substitute itself for the decision making authority in the respondent no.1 that the tenure of the ..... not taken the benefit of the extended period and should have gone back to his parent department but the petitioner did not do so and even now seeks extension of tenure though simultaneously claiming that he was not interested in continuing on deputation.8. the second reason for rejecting the argument of the petitioner is that observations ..... fact the petitioner should be continued in tenure on deputation with the respondent no.1 at least for six months w.e.f 1.2.2015 and which extension is not granted because of the malice attributable to the chairman of the respondent no.1 inasmuch as petitioner has raised issues of financial irregularities in certain .....

Daivid John Hopkins Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1997Mad366

..... by shivaraj patil. j, that writ petition was tiled by a french citizen holding a french passport issued by the french consulate at pondicherry. he applied for extension. his application for extension had been turned down and he was directed to leave the country within fifteen days. on 1-11-1995, he was served with the ..... to assign any reason for such grant or refusal.' (l) entrustment of such unguided, unrestricted and absolute discretionary power to the executive is antithetic to rule of law embodied in article 14 of the constitution of india. (m) article 21 of the constitution of india guarantees fundamental right to all persons, citizens and non-citizens. ..... the relevant part of the proviso states as follows : 'the central government shall have due regard to the conditions subject to which citizens of india may. by law or practice of that country become citizens of that country by registration'. (f) the british nationality act, 1948. provides for the require recriprocity, for it made .....

Wonderweld Electrodes (Private) Ltd. Rep. by Director Suryakant C. Pat ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)1MLJ386; 2003(26)PTC37(Mad)

..... been using the said brand name and trade mark all along. the first defendant has also agreed not to sell their products in the areas of tamil nadu, pondicherry, goa, kerala karnataka, andhra pradesh, orissa, west bengal and maharastra (except the districts of mumbai and thane). the plaintiff has paid compensation of rs. 50 ..... is stated that from 1968 onwards they have been manufacturing and selling welding rodes under the trade marks sun-arc and the emblem on a continuous and on extensive basis. they had duly registered the said trade marks under the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958 and secured statutory protection to the said trade marks. ..... defendant in favour of the second defendant is valid or not. here again, as rightly pointed out, the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958, which is the law governing the registration, protection, maintenance, licensing, infringement, assignment and renewal of trade marks. we have already referred to the fact that the assignment of trade mark sun .....

Justice Anandamoy Bhattacharjee Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (1986)81ITD181(Kol.)

..... (25a) of section 2 of the act. union territories of dadra and nagar haveli, goa, daman and diu and pondicherry did not form part of india in 1961 when the act came into force and, therefore, the act was expressly extended to those territories by the taxation laws (extension to union territories) regulation, 1963 with effect from 1-4-1963. no such ..... extension was made to the state of sikkim. (4) the assessee had though a residential house at siliguri in the state of west bengal ..... noticed that the union territories of dadra and nagar haveli were admitted into indian union on 11-8-1961 and goa, daman and diu on 20-12-1961 and pondicherry on 16-8-1962 and the act was extended thereto with effect from 1-4-1963 and for the purpose of section 6, the said territories were taken as .....

Thamirassu Vs. Kamalathammal

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1984)1MLJ11

..... the said order on or before 27th january, 1982. aggrieved by the said order, this revision petition has been filed by the tenant under section 10 of the pondicherry cultivating tenants protection act, 1970, read with section 115 of the code of civil procedure, inter alia contending that the order passed by the learned presiding officer of ..... cultivating tenant has failed to comply with the order made by the court and if (,?) after notice to the tenant and in the absence of a request for extension of time which again may be judicially examined, the default becomes wilful or contumatious. it is at that stage and at that stage alone that the revenue divisional ..... the revenue court, karaikal is illegal, against law, weight of evidence and probabilities of the case.6. it is contended by mr. r. thirugnanam on behalf of the revision petitioner that the revenue court has not .....

industrial Finance Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. the Cannanore Spinnin ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC1841; 2002(3)ALD113(SC); 2002(2)ARBLR676(SC); II(2002)BC430(SC); [2002]110CompCas685(SC); (2002)4CompLJ337(SC); JT2002(4)SC318; (2002)3MLJ144(SC); 2002(3)SCALE574;

..... of mortgage executed by the first respondent on 2.5.1963. the first respondent executed a legal mortgage under a document registered with the then notary of pondicherry as security for the repayment of the entire term loan of rs. 35,00,000/- on 30.4.1963, which also included the deferred payment guarantee ..... ought to be noticed for correct appreciation of the matter in its proper perspective. the facts disclose:having intended to set up another spinning unit at mahendra (pondicherry state), the first respondent approached the appellant/plaintiff for financial assistance and obtained sanction for term loan facility for rs. 35,00,000/- pending legal formalities, ..... anr. : [1983]1scr561 contended that by reason of the factum of the liability of the surety being co-extensive with that of the principal debtor and a discharge which the principal debtor may secure by operation of law, the same does not absolve the surety of his liability. in maharashtra state electricity board (supra) this court .....

M. Ponnupandian Vs. Selvabakiyam,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)3MLJ590

..... parte order the notice was not duly served, within 30 days from the date when the applicant had knowledge of the order. therefore, the amendment inserted by madras(pondicherry) amendment, extracted above with reference to rule 105(3) and 105(4) which in fact was deleted by the amendment of this court as stated above have not ..... also contended that since the civil procedure code was introduced in the year 1908, it did not enable the application of section 5 of the limitation act. to enable the extension of time for the act introduced after the limitation act, an amendment was brought under order xxi rule 105 by inserting clause 4 which enabled the application of ..... satisfactory explanation and also not maintainable following the judgment of a division bench of this court in n.m. natarajan - vs. - deivayanai ammal and others, 1989-1 law weekly 178. at page 179, the division bench has observed:-'section 5 of the limitation act, 1963, is not applicable to a petition filed for setting aside the .....

Madan Tarlok Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Home Secy ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1970P& H471

..... of india alone which has the power of appropriation thereof. as long as that is so the condition laid down in article 276 cannot be satisfied either by the extension of the law to the territory or even by passing an act of parliament on behalf of the union territory of chandigarh for the same purpose. the paramount condition is the satisfaction ..... has been made by my learned brother maha.jan j. in his judgment. reliance was also sought to be placed on i.t.m kanniyan v. income-tax officer, pondicherry, air 1968 sc 637. but on a closer analysis of the said judgment i find that neither the facts nor the ratio thereof has any bearing on the point at ..... union territories act. 1963, by the said act vide section 2(h), union territory means any of the union territories of himachal pradesh, manipur, tripura, goa, daman diu and pondicherry. by section 47 of the same act a provision is made for the creation of the consolidated funds of the union territories abovesaid in which all revenues received in a .....

Philips Electronics India Ltd vs.uoi Thr Director General of Health S ...

Court : Delhi

..... case (viii). respondent s firms i.e. m/s philips electronics limited miserably failed to deliver the stores i.e., cardiac catherisation equipment to be installed at zipmer at pondicherry within original d.p. i.e. up to 31st march 1994. however, it was supplied and installed during extended period of d.p. and this fact was even ..... . it is significant to mention that earlier stipulation regarding reserving the right to levy the ld was kept intact while granting even the second extension of dp up to 28th february 1995 vide department s/claimant s letter dated 2nd february 1995 (annexure h ). it is also pertinent to mention here that the ..... and this fact was even admitted by the... respondents themselves. not only this as per claimant s letter dated 3rd may 1994 (annexure d ) whereby the first extension of three months was granted and dp was extended from 31st march 1994 to 16th august 1994 by reserving their right to levy ld for delayed supplied of the stores .....