Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 2 definitions Page 6 of about 5,019 results (0.163 seconds)

Aug 28 2012 (HC)

Dalit Christians Educational and Development Trust Vs. the Vice Chance ...

Court : Chennai

..... for minority educational institutions act, 2004, they made a request by their application dated 24.6.2005 for the grant of provisional affiliation and thereafter for extension of affiliation, they filed a renewal application under section 10a of the amendment act 18/2006. the rejection of their affiliation was done without notice to ..... students in the foreign trade for the academic year 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007-2008. a provisional affiliation was granted for 2005-2006 and that extension of affiliation was issued for each year. the students were attending their respective examinations and results were also published. the college also had submitted an ..... act, 2004, wherein it was stated that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, a minority educational institution may seek recognition as an affiliated college of a scheduled university of its choice. the pondicherry university is one of the university found in the schedule. therefore, the affiliation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2012 (HC)

N.NameethA. Vs. the Pondicherry University and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... no power to prescribe regulations is concerned, as rightly contended by the counsel for the university, the academic council was constituted under section 22 of the pondicherry university act as the principal academic body of the university and they will have general supervision over the academic policies of the university. statute no.14 gives ..... e. may / june and november / december 2011) with the condition that such students would pay a penalty of rs.500/- per paper and no more extension would be granted under any circumstance.it was also resolved that all the colleges may be instructed to incorporate the condition to complete the course within the prescribed maximum ..... 2009.though ample chances were given for these candidates to qualify for degree, requests have been received from the candidates of various courses to give further extension beyond nov 2009 to qualify for the degree. the statistics of the candidate having upto 3 arrears in various programme as desired is given in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1997 (HC)

Rangaswamy @ Govindaram (Died) 5 ors. Vs. the Deputy Collector (Revenu ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(2)CTC97; (1997)IIMLJ662

..... and the learned single judge had held therein that in the absence of a specific extension of the limitation act to the union territory of pondicherry by virtue of extension of the provisions of the code of civil procedure with effect from 1.8.1966, the law of limitation, namely limitation act, 1963, also cannot be considered to have been ..... extended or that it became automatically applicable or enforceable in the union territory of pondicherry. in coming to such ..... as the date on which the provisions of act 15 of 1994 shall come into force in the whole of the union territory of pondicherry. in view of the above, the local law, namely, the french civil code in so far as it relates to the relevant provision pertaining to the period of limitation visualised under article .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1997 (HC)

Rengasamy @ Govindasamy (Died) and ors. Vs. Deputy Collector (Revenue) ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC731

..... the learned single judge had held therein that in the absence of a specific extension of the limitation act to the union territory of pondicherry by virtue of extension of the provisions of the code of civil procedure with effect from 1.8.1966, the law of limitation, namely limitation act, 1963, also cannot be considered to have been ..... extended or that it became automatically applicable enforceable in the union territory of pondicherry. in coming to such, a ..... 1995 as the date on which the provision of act 15 of 1994 shall come into force in the whole of the union territory of pondicherry. inview of the above, the local law, namely, the french code civil in so far as it relates to the relevant provision pertaining to the period of limitation visualised under article .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 2002 (HC)

Suryagandhi Vs. Lourduswamy

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2004Mad8; 2003(1)ARBLR234(Madras); (2002)3MLJ788

..... then the suit instituted after nine years is barred by limitation. the construction placed on art.54 by the lower appellate court cannot be sustained in law.38. the pondicherry limitation (repeal of local laws) act, 1994 is being relied upon by the counsel for the plaintiff to save the limitation period. section 3 of the said act provides that ..... pleaded by the parties. it is a bar to jurisdiction of court. the repugnancy and incongruity arise by reason of the fact that parliament by law viz. the high court at bombay: (extension of jurisdiction to goa, daman and diu) act, 1981 extended the jurisdiction of the high court of judicature at bombay to the union territory of ..... to the defendant calling upon the latter to execute a sale deed. there was no correspondence during this period between the plaintiff and the defendant with regard to extension of time for completion of the contract and there is nothing to show that anything was done by the plaintiff to keep alive the agreement of sale. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 2010 (HC)

R.Balasubramanian .. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu, and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... 7.2.2003 and 16.4.2003, had recorded, with appreciation, the volume of judicial work turned out by the petitioner as additional district judge of pondicherry at karaikal.12.expatiating his submissions, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that the recommendations of the administrative committee of the honourable high court ..... the considered opinion that the finding of the learned judge is fit to be accepted. accordingly, the committee hereby accepts the report. the matter relating to the extension or otherwise of mr.r.balasubramnian, principal district judge, pudukottai, who is attaining the age of 50 years, under f.r.56(2) came up ..... district judge-cum-chief judicial magistrate, dindigul, with ulterior motive, thus committed the acts of misuse of power, abuse of power and abuse of process of law and conduct unbecoming of a judicial officer and thereby rendered yourself liable to be punished under the tamil nadu civil services (discipline and appeal) rules".18. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2014 (HC)

Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and Others Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

..... 41. in paragraphs 16 to 18 of this decision this is what is held:- 16. what were the "things done" by the petitioners under the pondicherry law? the petitioners in the course of their import trade, having obtained authorization for the foreign exchange through their bankers, entered into firm contracts with foreign dealers ..... the repeal of the principal act, prohibiting registration of conveyances in respect of flats constructed under schemes sanctioned under section 20 and sold without obtaining extension of periods of completion of the schemes or obtaining no objection certificates from the competent authority under the principal act. according to the petitioners in ..... with these objects and peculiar facts and circumstances of each case that the state allowed the exemption to remain in force. that at appropriate stages the extensions to the exemption orders have been granted. therefore, if the exemption is granted firstly in public interest and secondly to relieve the undue hardship, then .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1994 (HC)

K. Vaithianathan and Etc. Vs. the Union of Territory of Pondicherry an ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1995Mad197

..... they are operating on the inter-state route pondichery to villupuram via, ariyur and kandamangalam. the third respondent is an operator on the inter-state route pondicherry to tiruvennainallur, via. villaianur. pakkani cross road, kariamanckam, madagadipet and valavanur. as per the permit conditions.she has to operate two singles on the ..... very question was raised, viz., that were a regional transport authority is proceeding with thefixation of timings in respect of a sanctioned routed and that extension or variation relates to the territorial jurisdiction of another regional transport authority, the counter-signature of that latter authority must be obtained, before convening the ..... respondents 1 and 2 to prevent the third respondent from running on the varied route without counter signature and without fixation of timings in accordance with law.6. in meeting the above arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner, mr. m. krishanappan, learned counsel for the third respondent, says .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1993 (HC)

P. Manogarane, Secretary, the Pondicherry Bar Association Vs. Union of ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1993)2MLJ50

..... the constitution of the selection committee including therein the chief justice or a judge of the high court deputed by him, chief secretary to government, pondicherry administration, secretary, law department, pondicherry, and the head of the judicial department, pondicherry.15. rule 11 of the rules prescribes the qualifications for direct recruits to the junior scale specifying, (i) citizenship of india; and (ii) practice as ..... of india and hence, the same is administered by the president of india acting through the lieutenant governor of pondicherry. section 9 of the pondicherry (administration) act, 1962, provides for the extension of the jurisdiction of the madras high court to the union territory of pondicherry as and from 6.11.1962. by virtue of section 10 of that act, the high court of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1996 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. T. Narayanaswami Pather

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1998]229ITR529(Mad)

..... voluntarily produced the account books. the tribunal also noticed that it was the second year of extension of indian tax laws to pondicherry state. in view of all these facts, the tribunal felt justified in invoking the provisions of pondicherry (taxation concessions) order, 1964, which permits the imposition of penalty lower than the minimum ..... co-operated with the department and voluntarily filed the account books, etc., which were in his custody. tax laws were also extended to pondicherry territory w.e.f. 1st april, 1963. according to cl. 16 of pondicherry (taxation concessions) order, 1964 notwithstanding anything contained in chapter xxi of the it act, 1961, the ito, ..... the minimum imposable for the asst. yr. 1965-66 (2) whether, on the facts obtaining in this case and having regard to the provisions of the pondicherry (taxation and concessions) order, 1964, the tribunal was within its powers to reduce the penalty below the minimum prescribed especially when such powers wasted with the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //