Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: pondicherry extension of laws act 1968 section 2 definitions Page 9 of about 5,019 results (0.781 seconds)

Mar 13 1997 (HC)

Sri Gajanana Motor Transport Co. Vs. the Secretary, Regional Transport ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : II(1998)ACC542; ILR1997KAR3045

..... application for grant of a regular permit or for a variation of conditions regarding extension of route for consideration. the learned counsel for the petitioner in support of his contention placed reliance on the following decisions: a viswanathan v. state transport appellate tribunal, pondicherry and anr., : [1987]2scr179 , he also made reference to decisions of ..... route even in case of permanent need for such facilities. we are accordingly of opinion that the regional transport authority was right as a matter of law in granting a temporary permit to the appellant under section 62(c) of the motor vehicles act in the circumstances of this case.'the expression 'to ..... and/or in continuation the temporary permit granted. grant of temporary permits in continuation extending its durability beyond four months is nothing but the abuse' of law. the learned counsel for the petitioner further contended that petitioner being a holder of a regular permit on the route from one point to the other he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 2005 (SC)

C. Albert Morris Vs. K. Chandrasekaran and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD106(SC); 2006(1)AWC229(SC); JT2005(9)SC127; (2006)1SCC228

..... second respondent - the hindustan petroleum corporation ltd. the said dealership is being carried on in the leased site belonging to the first respondent. the government of pondicherry granted no objection certificate under rule 144(1) of the petroleum rules, 1976 for the installation of retail outlet of petrol and hsd. the said no objection ..... 10a.28ca (approximately 11050 sq. ft.) within r.s.no. 242/2 pt. and bounded on the north by land belonging to small industries service institute, extension center, on the west by house and land belonging to divert kannagi, on the south by pondy-tindivana, highway, on the cast by land belonging to divert ..... - the hindustan petroleum corporation limited, invited our attention to the preamble of the petroleum act, 1934 which reads as under:'an act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the import, transport, storage, production, refining and blending of petroleum.'for effectuating the purpose of the said act, the petroleum rules, 1976 have been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 1995 (HC)

Kemi Kwaja Mohideen Vs. Susan Galife

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)2MLJ20

..... basis of the endorsement or on the basis of the agreement reached between the parties. i can only say that the principal district munsif, pondicherry, rent controller has failed to appreciate that the law is well-settled by catena of the decisions of the supreme court as well as this court that the order of eviction passed on ..... against the tenant, was also compromised on the basis of the endorsement made by the tenant. the view of the learned principal district munsif that since under the pondicherry buildings (lease and rent control) act, a rent controller can grant only three months time and since the rent controller has granted three years time in the instant ..... the entire petition premises to the landlord on or before the said date viz., 5th june, 1969 without fail under any circumstances and undertakes not to apply for extension of time. it was agreed by both parties that the memo of compromise was executable as a decree of court. the compromise petition was signed by both the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 2016 (HC)

M/s. Neycer India Limited Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Chennai

..... . considering the limited prayer sought for, mr.a.p.srinivas, learned senior standing counsel for customs, was put on notice on behalf of the commissioner of central excise, pondicherry, the sole respondent in all the appeals. 8. going through the material on record, mr.a.p.srinivas, learned senior standing counsel for the respondent submitted that the ..... ,00,000/- lakhs within a period of six weeks. the ld. advocate on behalf of the appellants submits that they have neither complied the stay order nor seeking extension of stay. since the appellants failed to comply with the stay order all the appeals are dismissed for non-compliance of the stay order. 11. though the tribunal ..... relevant factor for exercising powers under section 35-f of the central excise act, 1944. 5. on the above, the appellant has raised the following substantial questions of law:- 1. whether the order of the tribunal directing a pre-deposit of rs.3,00,000/- of the disputed taxes stands vitiated in as much as it fails .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2001 (HC)

Vijay Somani Vs. Capt. Ajay Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2002P& H215

..... their electoral right. as stated earlier appellant did not show as to why he could not meet the mlas on october 2, 1997 when they were available in pondicherry. material fact must be that the appellant was prevented from meeting the mlas which he did not allege and as to how he was so prevented would constitute material ..... of the petitioner was that he wanted to meet the mlas who had been taken away by the respondent but the said mlas were first kept at hotel ashoka at pondicherry and then taken to five star hotels in mahabalipuram. while considering the aforesaid allegations made against the respondent, the apex court, referring to the pleadings in the aforesaid ..... the above contention, reliance has been placed on sub-section (5) of section 86 of the 1951 act as also the law declared by the apex court, in this behalf.9. while advancing arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner extensively relied upon sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 86 of the 1951 act. the aforesaid sub-sections are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 1986 (HC)

Mangat Singh Surrinder Singh Vs. Appellate Assistant Commissioner, Sal ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1987]65STC333(Delhi)

..... 1941. it is urged that on the reasoning given by the supreme court in b. shama rao v. union territory of pondicherry [1967] 20 stc 215, the extension of the aforesaid act to delhi is bad. 11. this contention is not available to the petitioners in view of the ..... when section 8(2)(a) was enacted. the whole scheme of the central sales tax act is to adopt the machinery of the law relating to sales tax acts of the various states, in cases where those states happen to be the appropriate states as also the rates ..... may exceed the local rate in case that rate be less than 10 per cent.' 14. the supreme court also noticed difference between the law which was struck down by the supreme court in the case of b. shama rao [1967] 20 stc 215 and that contained in ..... p.) ltd. v. commercial tax officer, hubli.] 13. in [1974] 33 stc the supreme court observed as under : 'the policy of the law in this respect is that in case the rate of local sales tax be less than 10 per cent, in such an even the dealer, if the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 17 2005 (HC)

Minor Anantharaman Vs. Mahalingam and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2005(4)CTC392

..... 1968, the said lakshmi ammal in a sound disposing state of mind executed her last will and testament before the notaire sundaramurthy. on the extension of indian registration act to pondicherry, the said will was deposited with the registrar at karaikal by the said notaire. through the will, lakhsmi ammal bequeathed her properties to ..... has been raised that... 'the minor plaintiff has not established that the will has been properly executed and registered in accordance with the french position of law and procedure code civil'. when such definite contention has been raised regarding the non-compliance of the provisions relating to registration and will not being made ..... public register records only conveyances, and makes no pretence of guaranteeing the title of the grantor. the latter is at present the system of french law.'french code civil thus lays emphasis on registration and the documents being made public. such importance is attached to the registration and documents being made public .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2015 (HC)

K. Anbazhagan Vs. State of Karnataka, by its Chief Secretary, Governme ...

Court : Karnataka

..... state of tamil nadu. the advocate fees payable to the public prosecutor, additional public prosecutor or special public prosecutor by the state of pondicherry shall be borne by the state of tamil nadu and the home departments of the two states may undertake consultations with each other and an appropriate decision may be ..... as public prosecutor having requisite qualifications as prescribed under sub-section (8) of section 24 of cr.p.c. whether he is a lawyer in the state of pondicherry or any other state. as it is a criminal case registered by the state of tamil nadu the expenses for conducting the trial are to be borne by the ..... by the code of the criminal procedure (amendment act 1978) and rule 30 of the karnataka law officers (appointment and conditions of service) rules 1977 sri b.v. acharya, senior advocate and former advocate general of karnataka, no.42, 5th main, jayamahal extension, bangalore 560 041, is appointed as public prosecutor to conduct c.c.no.7/1997 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2016 (HC)

The Government of Puducherry Rep. by its Joint Secretary, Department o ...

Court : Chennai

..... of the total quantity of each variety of paddy or rice so transported and shall also obtain separate permit in this behalf from the director of civil supplies, pondicherry in pondicherry region and the regional executive officer, karaikal in karaikal region, as the case may be. " 7. pursuant to the communication from the government of india, ..... .06.2010, notifying the amendment to clause 4 of levy order increasing from "ten percent" to "fifty percent". the request of the government of puducherry for extension of delivery of single boiled levy rice for kms 2009-10 for two months beyond 30th september 2010 and the rates, as per the enclosed provisional cost sheet ..... without reasons. in the g.o, revoking the incentive, public interest is shown as predominant reason. we do not see any arbitrariness or violation of rule of law in revoking the incentive. 22. learned counsel appearing for the respondents pointed out that in the impugned order, it is mentioned that incentive to the millers under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2015 (HC)

K Anbazhagan Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... state of tamil nadu. the advocate fees payable to the public prosecutor, additional public prosecutor or special public prosecutor by the state of pondicherry shall be borne by the state 26. 38 of tamil nadu and the home departments of the two states may undertake consultations with each other and an appropriate decision ..... as public prosecutor having requisite qualifications as prescribed under sub-section (8) of section 24 of cr.p.c. whether he is a lawyer in the state of pondicherry or any other state. as it is a criminal case registered by the state of tamil nadu the expenses for conducting the trial are to be borne by the ..... by the code of the criminal procedure (amendment act 1978) and rule 30 of the karnataka law officers (appointment and 41 conditions of service) rules 1977 sri b.v.acharya, senior advocate and former advocate general of karnataka, no.42, 5th main, jayamahal extension, bangalore 560 041, is appointed as public prosecutor to conduct c.c. no.7/1997 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //