Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :24. 07.2013 Judgment delivered on:29. 07.2013 + CRL.A. 791/2010 KAMAL KISHORE SINGH @ PANDIT Appellant Through: Mr.A.K.Trivedi, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, Addl. Public Prosecutor. + CRL.A. 1014/2010 MUNNI LAL Through: .Appellant Mr.R.K.Anand, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, Addl. Public Prosecutor. + CRL.A. 1239/2010 TILISRA Through: .Appellant Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, Addl. Public Prosecutor. CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. The appellants are aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 15.4.2010 vide which they had been convicted for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 120B (1) of the IPC. Accused Munni Lal and Tilisra had been further convicted under Section 45...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH MONDAY,THE 29TH DAY OF JULY2013/7TH SRAVANA, 1935 WA.No. 229 of 2013 () ----------------------------------- WP(C) 17661/2012 & WP(C) 21403/2012 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 02 11-2012 ----------------------- APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN THE WP(C) : ----------------------------------------------------------- SIDHARTHAN KOLANGARAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERAMANGALAM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT AND ADDITIONAL 2 D RESPONDENT IN WP(C) : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, PIN 67.001.2. RADHAKRISHNAN S/O. NARAYANAN NAIR, NECHULLI, ARYOOR MANNARKKAD. R1 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW R2 BY ADVS. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH MONDAY,THE 29TH DAY OF JULY2013/7TH SRAVANA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 2592 of 2013 (Z) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA 18/2013 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 01 04-2013 ....................................... PETITIONER(S)/APPLICANT : ------------------------------------------ N.SUDHARMAN U.D.CLERK, SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, NORTH PARAVOOR BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT : ----------------------------------------------- TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 001. BY SRI.NOBLE MATHEW, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS OP KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AMV :2. : OP(KAT).No. 2592 of 2013 (Z) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN MONDAY,THE 29TH DAY OF JULY2013/7TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 16845 of 2013 (E) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. A. KARLOSE, S/O.AROGYAM, ST.ANTONY'S COTTAGE, MOOTHAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.2. GREETA CHARLES, LITTLE FLOWER, MOOTHAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.3. LATHA SAMSON, LITTLE FLOWER, MOOTHAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.4. JOSEPHINE NOBLE, 6-PUMA COTTAGE, MOOTHAKKARA, KOLLAM.5. FRANCIS RUBY, SLUM COLONY, MOOTHAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.6. GEORGE, 6/6-B HIGH GROUND, KASAILAR COMPOUND, KANYAKUMARI.7. RAJESH THIRAVIYAM, S/O.P.THIRAVIYAM, K.C.492, MANIKKAMMAL PURAYIDOM, MOOTHAKKARA, KOLLAM.8. SUSHEELA RANI @ RANI BABU, W/O.BABU KUMAR, AROGYAMATHA MANDIRAM, MOOTHAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE STATE POLICE CHIEF, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 001. Prv. W.P.(C).NO.16845/2013-E:2. THE DISTRICT P...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH MONDAY,THE 29TH DAY OF JULY2013/7TH SRAVANA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 2599 of 2013 (Z) ----------------------------------------- OA 274/2013 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ...... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ DR. M.V.SUDHAKARAN, S/O.K.K.VASU, AGED 5 YEARS, RESEARCH OFFICER (BOTANY) DRUG STANDARDIZATION UNIT GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.2. THE DIRECTOR,THE DIRECTORATE OF AYURVEDA MEDICAL EDUCATION AROGYA BHAVAN, NEAR AYRUVEDA COLLEGE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.3. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERMENT AYRUVEDA COLLEGE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.4. G.R.JAYAKUMAR, SENIOR RESEARCH OFFICER (BOT...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-26-2013
Misc. Criminal Case No.9626/2013 26.7.13 As per B.D.Rathi,J Shri Vijay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General for the applicant-State. Heard on admission. This is an application for grant of leave to appeal under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Code. for short).By the impugned judgment, respondent has been acquitted of the offence under Sections 450, 376(2)(g) and 506 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (for short the IPC.) and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short the Act.).The impugned judgment dated 31/5/2013 was passed by Special Judge (under the Act) at Sehore in Special Case No.13/2013. As per the prosecution story, on 25/4/12, while prosecutrix, a widow belonging to scheduled tribe, was inside her tin-shade hut located in the field of Umesh Chouhan, respondent Guddu Kirar along with co-accused Radheshyam Kirar knocked her door. As she opened the door, both of them pushed and flumped her on the gro...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-26-2013
P.C. : 1. The respondent no.2, an Advocate (complainant) desires to argue the matter for himself. His Counsel, Mr.Ketan Chottani is discharged. Heard extensively. Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. A unique litigation between an Advocate and his client has reached this court. On a complaint by respondent no.2, process for offence under Section 420, 120B of I.P.C. issued by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pune, on 15.2.2012, confirmed in Criminal Revision No.157 of 2012 by the learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, is questioned by original accused. 3. The accused-applicants, a couple had difference in their matrimonial life, had approached respondent no.2 for his legal advise. Applicant no.1 Smt. Dnyananda (Wife), was known to the complainant through her parents. The complainant advised that a petition for Divorce by mutual consent could be filed. Parties had 4-5 sittings. Complainant e-mailed draft of such consent petition to the wife, while it could not reach the husb...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-25-2013
CRA No.689-SB o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA No.689-SB of 2001 Date of Decision:-25.7.2013 Deepak Kashyap & Pushpa ...Appellants Versus State of UT Chandigarh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr.K.D.S.Hooda, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the State of UT Chandigarh. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.(Oral) As illogical as it may seem, but strictly speaking, the tendency of husbands to harass and treat their wives with cruelty in connection with and on account of demand of dowry, culminating into their deaths, otherwise than under normal circumstances at the first instance and sequelly, the frequency of relatives of the deceased involving all other relatives of husbands in criminal cases of dowry death, in order to wreak vengeance, have been tremendously increasing day-by- day adversely affecting the basic social fabric of the society. Moreover, leaving the Courts in lurch to separate the grain from...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5640 of 2013 Pran Manjhi .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. M.K.Dey For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 25.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Pindrajora PS case No. 79 of 2011 pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge 2nd, Bokaro. There is direct allegation against the petitioner that he caused assault to the deceased (Nepal Hembrom) on his head by means of axe, as a result of which he died. It is submitted that it is not a case under section 302 IPC; rather the contentions made in the fard beyan would make out offence under section 304 IPC. Petitioner is in custody since last two years. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering direct allegation against the petitioner, I do not feel inclined to grant him bail. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-25-2013
"CR" IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2013 3RD SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 19564 of 2011 (U) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. RATHEESH .K.R, AGED 26 S/O.LATE RAVINDRAN, KALAMBUKATTU NIKARTHIL HOUSE, PANAVALLY VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA.2. RENUKA, W/O.LATE RAVINDRAN, AGED 50 KALAMBUKATTU NIKARTHIL HOUSE, PANAVALLY VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA, REP.BY HER POWER OF- ATTORNEY HOLDER SAILAN, AGED 46 S/O.KUMARAN, MALAYATTIL NIKARTHIL, PANAVALLY P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.3. REKHA, D/O.LATE RAVINDRAN, AGED 26 KALAMBUKATTU NIKARTHIL HOUSE, PANAVALLY VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA, REP.BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SAILAN, AGED 46 S/O.KUMARAN, MALAYATTIL NIKARTHIL, PANAVALLY P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.4. OMANA, W/O.LATE PARTHAN, AGED 48 KALAMBUKATTU NIKARTHIL HOUSE, PANAVALLY VI...
Tag this Judgment!