Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-22-2013
Criminal Appeal not D-191-DB of 2009 (O&M) with Criminal Appeal not D-392-DB of 2009 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Appeal not D-191-DB of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 22, 2013. Prince Pal Singh alias Vicky ...Appellant(s) Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent(s) Crl. Appeal not D-392-DB of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 22, 2013. Vijay Kumar alias Babbu ...Appellant(s) Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?. Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. No Present: Ms. G.K. Mann, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. B.S. Bhlalla, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. ***** Sunil 2013.09.02 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Criminal Appeal not D-191-DB of 2009 (O&M) with Criminal Appeal not D-392-DB of 2009...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :9th May, 2013 Judgment delivered on:22. d August,2013 % + CRL.M.C. No. 1604/2007 & Crl. M.A. No. 5582/2007 (for stay) POONAM SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Malavika Rajkotia and Mr.Chetanya Puri, Advocates with Petitioner in person. Versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: SHO Rajender Gautam, P.S. Alipur for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.K.Malik, Mr. Rahul Raj Malik and Mr. Rajeev Chauhan, Advocates. AND + CRL.M.C. No. 2751/2007 & Crl. M.A. No. 9723/07 (for stay) NARENDER SINGH SALKAN Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Malavika Rajkotia and Mr.Chetanya Puri, Advocates with Petitioner in person. Versus STATE & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents SHO Rajender Gautam, P.S. Alipur for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.K.Malik, Mr. Rahul Raj Malik and Mr. Rajeev Chauhan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.Crl. M.A. Nos. 18903 & 18904/2011 (both for adjournment) in CRL.M.C. Nos. 1604 & 2751 of 2007 Dismissed as infr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-22-2013
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION No.312 of 2013 In Re: Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocate JUDGMENT Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.1. Civil Appeal No.1398 of 2005, Mohamed Israfil v. Raufunessa Bibi (D) by L.Rs. & Ors., was dismissed in default vide order dated 8.3.2013 as none appeared to press the appeal. An application for restoration of the said appeal was filed by Shri Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocate-on-Record (hereinafter referred to as AOR). The said application was listed in the Court on 8.7.2013. The Court was of the view that the facts contained in the application were not correct and the counsel appearing for the applicant was not able to clarify the same. The Court passed over the matter and asked the counsel appearing therein to call the AOR who would be able to explain the factual controversy. When the matter was taken up in the second round, the Court was informed that Shri Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR refused to come ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Aug-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST 2013 30TH SRAVANA, 1935 CRL.A.No. 2541 of 2008 ( ) --------------------------- SESSIONS CASE NO.503/2003 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT (FAST TRACK-I), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CP 3/2002 of J.M.F.C.-III,NEYYATTINKARA APPELLANT(S)/ACCUSED: ----------------------- SUDHAN, S/O. RAMACHANDRAN, VAISAKH BHAVAN, VENGAPOTTA, KAZHIVOOR DESOM KANJIRAMKULAM VILLAGE. BY SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.M.K.DAMODARAN ADVS. SRI.ALAN PAPALI SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------- STATE OF KERALA (CRIME NO.58/2001 OF KANJIRAMKULAM POLICE STATION, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POOVAR) REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.K.RAJEEV. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-07-2013, THE COURT ON 21-08-2013 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKAR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Aug-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST 2013 30TH SRAVANA, 1935 WA.No. 495 of 2013 () IN WP(C).6966/2013 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.6966/2013 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ------------------------------------------ APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN THE WPC: -------------------------------- M/S. CONFRATE CARGE SERVICES PVT.LTD., AGED 6 YEARS WILLINGDON ISLAND, KOCHI-3 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BALAGOPALA B. PAI. BY ADVS.SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON SRI.M.JITHESH MENON RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN THE WPC: ------------------------------------------------- 1. JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER MATTANCHERY, (TAXATION) KOCHI-2.2. SRI. T.K.PRASAD, S/O.KUNJAPPAN, CHETTIKKAD HOUSE, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI-6.3. SRI. C.K.JOSEPH JOHN S/O. KORA, CHETTISSERIL HOUSE, GANDHI NAGAR P.O. KOTTAYAM, PIN-686008.4. M/S. SREERAM TRAN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Aug-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No.429 of 1990 =============================================== Manoj Kumar Pandey son of Lallan Pandey, resident of village Sundarpur, P.S.Yakanpur, District Patna .... .... Appellant Versus The State Of Bihar .. .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 430 of 1990 =============================================== 1. Madan Pandey son of Sri Ram Niwas Pandey 2. Pappu Pandey son of Sri Ram Singhar Pandey 3. Surendra Singh son of Sri Ram Niwas Singh all are resident of village Chewari, P.S. Ramgarh, District Rohtas ... Appellants Versus The State Of Bihar ... .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 431 of 1990 =============================================== Uma Pandey son of Vibhuti Pandey, resident of village Chewari, P.S.Ramgarh, District Rohtas .... .... Appellant Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 432 of 1990 =============================================== Anand Kumar Pande...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Aug-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No.429 of 1990 =============================================== Manoj Kumar Pandey son of Lallan Pandey, resident of village Sundarpur, P.S.Yakanpur, District Patna .... .... Appellant Versus The State Of Bihar .. .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 430 of 1990 =============================================== 1. Madan Pandey son of Sri Ram Niwas Pandey 2. Pappu Pandey son of Sri Ram Singhar Pandey 3. Surendra Singh son of Sri Ram Niwas Singh all are resident of village Chewari, P.S. Ramgarh, District Rohtas ... Appellants Versus The State Of Bihar ... .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 431 of 1990 =============================================== Uma Pandey son of Vibhuti Pandey, resident of village Chewari, P.S.Ramgarh, District Rohtas .... .... Appellant Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 432 of 1990 =============================================== Anand Kumar Pande...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Aug-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No.429 of 1990 =============================================== Manoj Kumar Pandey son of Lallan Pandey, resident of village Sundarpur, P.S.Yakanpur, District Patna .... .... Appellant Versus The State Of Bihar .. .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 430 of 1990 =============================================== 1. Madan Pandey son of Sri Ram Niwas Pandey 2. Pappu Pandey son of Sri Ram Singhar Pandey 3. Surendra Singh son of Sri Ram Niwas Singh all are resident of village Chewari, P.S. Ramgarh, District Rohtas ... Appellants Versus The State Of Bihar ... .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 431 of 1990 =============================================== Uma Pandey son of Vibhuti Pandey, resident of village Chewari, P.S.Ramgarh, District Rohtas .... .... Appellant Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 432 of 1990 =============================================== Anand Kumar Pande...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Aug-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No.429 of 1990 =============================================== Manoj Kumar Pandey son of Lallan Pandey, resident of village Sundarpur, P.S.Yakanpur, District Patna .... .... Appellant Versus The State Of Bihar .. .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 430 of 1990 =============================================== 1. Madan Pandey son of Sri Ram Niwas Pandey 2. Pappu Pandey son of Sri Ram Singhar Pandey 3. Surendra Singh son of Sri Ram Niwas Singh all are resident of village Chewari, P.S. Ramgarh, District Rohtas ... Appellants Versus The State Of Bihar ... .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 431 of 1990 =============================================== Uma Pandey son of Vibhuti Pandey, resident of village Chewari, P.S.Ramgarh, District Rohtas .... .... Appellant Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 432 of 1990 =============================================== Anand Kumar Pande...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Decided on : Aug-21-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT CUTTACK Government Appeal No.17 of 1999 From the judgment dated 15.3.1994 passed by the learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Berhampur in Sessions Trial No.9/92 (S.C. No.40/92 GDC) -------------------State of Orissa . Appellant -versusSantosh Kumar Swain & others . For Appellant : M/s. Addl. Government Advocate For Respondents Respondents : M/s.B.Routray, A.K.Mohanty, B.Sarangi, S.S.Kanungo, A.K.Baral & B.Dash Mr.D.P.Dhal -------------------Date of Judgment:21. 08.2013 -------------------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE KUMARI JUSTICE SANJ.PANDA AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------S. Panda, J.The appellant has filed this Government Appeal challenging the judgment dated 15.3.1994 passed by the learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Berhampur in Sessions Trial No.9/92 (S.C. No.40/92 GDC) acquitting the accused persons of the charges under Sections 148/302/149 IPC and charges ...
Tag this Judgment!