Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jul-25-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: Rajesh Dwivedi Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7429/2013) DATE OF ORDER : July 25th, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS ____________________________________ Reportable Mr. Hanuman Singh Choudhary for the petitioner. Mr. R.L. Jangid, Addl. Advocate General. Counsel for the petitioners in the writ petitions mentioned in Schedule-A appended to this judgment/order : Mr. A.K. Rajvanshi, Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, Dr. Nupur Bhati, Mr. Arjun Purohit, Mr. H.S. Sidhu, Mr. Sanjay Mathur, Mr. Shambhoo Singh, Mr. V.N. Kalla, Mr. M.S. Godara, Mr. S. Sarupariya, Mr. Vinod Purohit, Mr. Sanjeet Purohit, Mr. C.S. Bissa, Mr. V.K. Bhadu, Mr. P.R. Mehta, Mr. Amit Dave, Mr. Bharat Devasi, Mr. R.A. Vaishnav, Mr. V.R. Choudhary, Mr. R.S. Choudhary, Mr. J.R. Chawel, Mr. Deepak Nehra, Mr. J.Khan, Mr. Shardul Bishnoi, Mr. Manoj Pareek, Dr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Mr. Bharat Shrimali, Mr. Rajesh Bishnoi,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-25-2013
CRA No.823-SB o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRA No.823-SB of 2000 Date of Decision:-25.7.2013 Bawa Singh & Ors. ---Appellants Versus State of Punjab ---Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr.D.S.Pheruman, Advocate with Mr.Dilsher Mann, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.Jaspreet Singh, AAG Punjab for the State. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.(ORAL) Assailing the prosecution version and its evidence in entirety, appellant-convicts Bawa Singh and others (for brevity the appellants.) have preferred the instant appeal to challenge the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 8.8.2000, by virtue of which, appellant Bawa Singh was substantively convicted & sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (for short RI.) for a period of five years, to pay a fine of ` 1000/- and in default thereof to further undergo RI for a period of two months, for the commission of offence punishable u/s 307 IPC; to undergo RI for a period o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-24-2013
1 Writ Petition No.13713 of 2006 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava Writ Petition No.13713 of 2006 PETITIONER:1. Rajendra Prasad Parihar, aged 48 years, S/o Premdas Parihar, R/o Jasalpur Hoshangabad (M.P.) 2 Ajay Tiwari, aged 38 years, S/o K.P.Tiwari, R/o Kothi Bazar Hoshangabad (M.P.) 3. Alok Tiwari,aged 32 years S/o K.P.Tiwari, R/o Kothi Bazar Hoshangabad (M.P.) 4. Kirat Singh, aged 40 years S/o Babulal Mina, R/o Baharpur Babai, Hoshangabad (M.P.) 5. Mangilal Tomar S/o Badri Prasad Tomar, Aged 55 years, R/o Niaz Colony Harsi Hoshangabad (M.P.) 6. Nepal Rao Aged 48 years, S/o Shankar Rao, Ex- Serviceman Tawanagar, Itarsi District Hoshangabad (M.P.) 7. Mahesh Gulbake, Aged 30 years S/o Shri Ram Gulbake R/o Tawanagar Itarsi District Hoshangabad (M.P.) 8. Shri Prem Singh S/o Kalloo Singh, Aged 60 years,Retired from M.P.Police Itarsi, District Hoshangabad (M.P.) 9. Hari Narayan Sharma,Aged 38 years S/o Mithoolal Sharma,R/o Jummerati Di...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Decided on : Jul-24-2013
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK OTAPL No.02 of 2013 From order No.A-431/KOL/2012 dated 05.07.2012 passed by the learned Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Zonal Bench, Kolkata in Customs Appeal No.C/174/2011 . ---------M/s Visa Steel Limited 11, Ekamra Kanan, Bhubaneswar-751 015 (Odisha). -VersusCommissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Bhubaneswar -1, C.R. Building, Rajaswa Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751 007 (Odisha). Appellant Respondent For Appellant : M/s S.K. Mohanty, J.Mohanty & P. Rath. For Respondent : Mrs. Mrinalini Padhi. ---------- P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE I. MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment:24. 07.2013 B.N. MAHAPATRA, J.The present appeal has been directed under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short, the Act, 1962.) against the order dated 05.07.2012 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, CESTAT.), East Zonal Bench, Kolkata in Customs Appeal No.C/174/2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-24-2013
Oral Judgment: (Mrs. V.K. Tahilramani, J.) Criminal Appeal No.300 of 2009 has been preferred by original accused No.3 Anand Behra and original accused No.4 Ajay Das. Criminal Appeal No.301 of 2009 has been preferred by original accused No.1 Manoj Avale and original accused No.2 Anwar Shaikh. Both these appeals have been preferred by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 1st January, 2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case No.187/2006. By the said judgment and order, the learned Sessions Judge convicted all the four appellants under section 302 read with 34 of IPC, Section 397 and Section 394 of IPC. For the offence under section 302 read with section 34 of IPC, each of the appellants is sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.500/- each, i/d. R.I. for three months. For the offence under section 397, each of the appellants is sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years and fine of Rs. 500/- each i/d. R.I for th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2013 1ST SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 5580 of 2013 (V) --------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------- LINI ALPHONSA V., WIFE OF LATE FEBIN JOHN C., ARACKL HOUSE PUTHANANGADI P.O., PERINTHALMANNA TALUK MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAJESH KORMATH RESPONDENTS: ------------ 1. THE DISTRICT INSURANCE OFFICER, MALAPPURAM, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT INSURANCE OFFICER UP-HILL P.O., MALAPPURAM, PIN 519. 2. THE INSURANCE DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE INSURANCE DEPARTMENT, 'TRANS TOWER' VAZHUTHACAD, THYCAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 001. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KOZHIKODE, CIVIL STATION, CIVIL STATION P.O. KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN 001. 4. T.V.ANNAMMA, CHIRAYATH HOUSE, N.G.O.QUARTERS, MARYKUNNU P.O. KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN 012. 5. NOBLE JOHN C., CHIRAYATH HOUSE, N.G.O. QUARTERS, MARYKUNNU P.O. KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN 012. 6. NISHA J...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2013 1ST SRAVANA, 1935 DBA.NO. 53 OF 201.() ---------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI.P.GOPAL RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- THE DEPUTY EXAMINER, LOCAL FUND AUDIT, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY EXAMINER, LOCAL FUND AUDIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW THIS DEVASWOM BOARD APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: NS DBA.NO. 53 OF 201.() ------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES : ANNEXURE A: COPY OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD DATED 21 11.2012. ANNEXURE B : COPY OF THE MEMBER DATED 16 11.2012 A...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-23-2013
Criminal Appeal not D-709-DB of 2008 and Criminal Appeal not D-697-DB o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal not D-709-DB of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : July 23, 2013 Loveleen Arora ...Appellant Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent Criminal Appeal not D-697-DB of 2008 Hardeep Singh ...Appellant Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY Present:- Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate with Ms. Vriti Gujral, Advocate for the appellant in Criminal Appeal not D-709-DB of 2008 Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the appellant in Criminal Appeal not D-697-DB of 2008 Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State. Mr. J.K. Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhawal Bhandari, Advocate for the complainant. *** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?. Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:17.07.2013 Judgment delivered on:22.07.2013 CRL.A. 719/2010 & Crl. M.A No. 20265/2012 MANGE KHAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Avninder Singh and Mr. Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with Inspector Rajesh Vijay. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.Crl. M.A No. 20265/2012 1 This is an application filed by the applicant Mange Khan under Section 391 read with Section 311 and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for recalling PW-6, PW-8 & PW-9 for their further cross-examination. 2 The averments made in the application are to the effect that although admittedly all the aforenoted witnesses i.e. PW-6, PW-8 & PW-9 had been examined and cross-examined but because of the fault of the counsel, no effective cross-examinati...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-22-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. A. 201/2003 Date of Decision:22. d July, 2013 NARESH @ KOKI Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Hem C. Vashisht, Adv. along with appellant in person versus STATE OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Ms. Fizani Husain, APP CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 22nd February, 2003 and order on sentence dated 7th March, 2003 arising out of Sessions Case No.133/2000 in case FIR No. 268/2000, PS Sangam Vihar under Sections 302/307/34 IPC vide which the appellant along with co-accused was held guilty of offence under Section 324/34 IPC and 326/34 IPC. All the accused were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of five years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- each under Section 326/34 IPC, in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment of six months. Further rigorous imprisonment for one year was awarded to each of the accused persons under Section 324/34 IPC. Th...
Tag this Judgment!