Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-22-2013
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :22. 07.2013 + CS(OS) 1608/2010 WUXE ZHANG & ANR Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sangal, Advocate versus SUBHASH AGARWAL & ANR Through: NEMO ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) The plaintiff has filed the present suit to seek the reliefs of injunction, passing of, copyright infringement, rendition of accounts, delivery up and damages against the defendants. The case of the plaintiff is that it is the prior user and adopter of the trademark GFIVE, which has been adopted by the plaintiff since 01.09.2008. The defendant has been using the mark, XFIVE which is phonetically, visually similar and deceptively similar to the plaintiffs mark, GFIVE. The user of the defendant is in the same class of goods i.e. class 35 in which plaintiffs mark is registered. The plaintiff and the defendants are using their respective marks in respect of mobile pho...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Decided on : Jul-22-2013
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.14030 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------Odisha Private Engineering Schools Association (OPESA), represented through its Secretary, Er. Saroj Kumar Sahoo, aged about 49 years, S/o. Late Krushna Mohan Sahoo, Regd. Office at Plot No.6/652, IRC Village, Nayapalli, Jeydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar, Dist: Khurda Petitioner -VersusState of Odisha and others Opp. Parties For Petitioner : Mr. B. Routray, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sanjit Mohanty, Sr. Advocate M/s. D. Routray, P.K. Sahoo, S. Das, S. Jena, S.K. Samal, S.P. Nath, S. Rout & S.D. Routray For Opp. Parties : Mr. Asok Mohanty Advocate General Mr. V. Narasingh Additional Government Advocate [For O.P. Nos.1 to 3]. ---------- P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment:22. 07.2013 B.N. Mahapatra, J.This Writ Petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus directing opposite parties, particularl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-19-2013
CP No.29 of 2013. ::-1-:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Company Petition No.29 OF 201.(O & M) Date of Decision:19. h July,2013. IN THE MATTER OF: Section 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 AND IN THE MATTER OF : Scheme of Amalgamation of FAMOUS BUILDMART PRIVATE LIMITED...Petitioner Company-1/Transferor Company-1 AND NOBLE REALCo.PRIVATE LIMITED...Petitioner Company-2/Transferor Company-2 AND PRESENT BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED...Petitioner Company-3/Transferor Company WITH M3M INDIA LIMITED ...Transferee Company Present: Ms.Munisha Gandhi, Advocate with Mr.Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate. Mr.D.P.Ojha, Official Liquidator. CORAM: HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL].C.A.No.99 of 2013 Allowed as prayed for. C.P.No.29 of 2013 In this petition under Section 391 and 394...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2013 28TH ASHADHA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 2492 of 2013 (Z) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA 377/2013 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 07 06-2013 PETITIONER/APPLICANT: --------------------------- VISHMAKUMARI J AGED 3 YEARS D/O JERALD, POYPALLI VILAKOM HOSUE, SOUTH KOLLOMKODU POZHIYOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 513. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH P.NAIR RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDNETS: ------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION D.P.I. JUNCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR EDUCATION KOLLAM.3. THE HEAD MASTER/PRINCIPAL TCNMHS, NEDUMPARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT KOLLAM.4. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OFFICE, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAYOF JULY 2013 28TH ASHADHA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 4172 of 2012 (Z) ----------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- K.V.MURALEEDHARAN, DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS APPELLATE AUTHORITY, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT 'POORNASREE', MANNUTHY.P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 001. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 001. 3. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND CIVIL SERVICES, NEW DELHI-110 001.4. UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHAHJAHAN ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 001. R1 &a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22766 of 2010 Sukhjit Singh and others ...PETITIONERS Versus U.T.Administration and others ....RESPONDENTS CWP No.11284 of 2011 Col. Maluk Singh and others ...PETITIONERS Versus U.T.Administration and others ....RESPONDENTS CWP No.7617 of 2011 Lt. Col. S.C.Bali and others ...PETITIONERS Versus U.T.Administration and others ....RESPONDENTS CWP No.12974 of 2011 Major Surinder Singh and others ...PETITIONERS Versus U.T.Administration and others ....RESPONDENTS CWP No.20454 of 2011 Jagdish Kaur and others ...PETITIONERS Versus U.T.Administration and others ....RESPONDENTS Dass Narotam 2013.07.22 12:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.22766 of 2010 & eight other connected petitions -2- CWP No.24420 of 2011 Smt. Jasbir J. Singh ...PETITIONER Versus U.T.Administration and others ....RESPONDENTS CWP No.24413 of 2011 Mohan Lal ...PETITIONER Versus Chandigarh Housing Board and another ....RESPONDENTS CWP N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-18-2013
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION T.C.(C) NO.98 OF 201.CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE & ORS ...Petitioners VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ...Respondents WITH T.C.(C) NO.99/2012 T.C.(C) NO.101/2012 T.C.(C) NO.100/2012 T.C.(C) NO.102/2012 T.C.(C) NO.103/2012 W.P.(C) NO.480/2012 T.C.(C) NO.104/2012 T.C.(C) NO.105/2012 W.P.(C) NO.468/2012 W.P.(C) NO.467/2012 W.P.(C) NO.478/2012 T.C.(C) NO.107/2012 T.C.(C) NO.108/2012 W.P.(C) NO.481/2012 W.P.(C) NO.464/2012 T.C.(C) NO.110/2012 T.C.(C) NOS.132-134/2012 T.C.(C) NOS.117-118/2012 T.C.(C) NOS.115-116/2012 T.C.(C) NOS.125-127/2012 T.C.(C) NOS.113-114/2012 T.C.(C) NOS.128-130/2012 T.C.(C) NOS.121-122/2012 T.C.(C) NO.112/2012 T.C.(C) NO.131/2012 T.C.(C) NOS.123-124/2012 T.C.(C) NO.111/2012 T.C.(C) NO.120/2012 T.C.(C) NO.119/2012 T.C.(C) NOS.135-137/2012 T.C.(C) NOS.138-139/2012 W.P.(C) NO.495/2012 W.P.(C) NO.511/2012 W.P.(C) NO.512/2012 W.P.(C) NO.514/2012 W.P.(C) NO.516/2012 W.P.(C) NO.519/2012 W.P.(C) NO....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH THURSDAY,THE 18TH DAY OF JULY 2013 27TH ASHADHA, 1935 A.S.No. 704 of 2000 (D) ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN O.S.NO. 133/1991 of SUB COURT, PATHANAMTHITTADATED 22 12-1999 APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: -------------------------------- N. GOPINATHA KURUP, S/O. NARAYANA KURUP, THUNDIL THEKKETHIL, KALANJOOR MURI, KALANJOOR VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTADISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR SRI.C.G.SHISHEER RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------- 1. THE STATEOF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BUILDINGS DIVISION, PATHANAMTHITTA. R1& R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: TH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2013 26TH ASHADHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 17601 of 2012 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : ---------- NABEEL A.VAHEED, AGED 2 YEARS S/O.ABDUL VAHEED, RESIDING AT ARAMAM, BUNGALAMKUNNU NILAMEL P.O., KOLLAM-691 535. BY ADVS.SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ SRI.S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA) RESPONDENTS : ---------- 1. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (AN AUTONOMOUS ORGANIZATION UNDER THE UNION MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA) HEAD OFFICE, NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PIN- 110001 2. THE REGIONAL OFFICER CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, CHENNAI-40.3. THE PRINCIPAL, T.K.M.CENTENARY PUBLIC SCHOOL T.K.M. COLLEGE COMPLEX, KOLLAM-691 005, KERALA STATE. R1 TO R2 BY SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-16-2013
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2079 OF 199.:{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2079 of 1996 Date of Decision: July 16, 2013 Pawan Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JUDGE 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab, for the State. Mr.Kulbir Narwal, Addl.A.G., Haryana, for the State. ***** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JUDGE By this order, we propose to decide two writ petitions i.e.Civil Writ Petition Nos.2079 of 1996 (Pawan Kumar and others versus Union of India and otheRs.and 8395 of 1996 (M/s Rama Medical Store, Rajpura and others versus Union of India and otheRs.as common...
Tag this Judgment!