Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2013
..... his treatment. page 25 of the documents (ex.a-2/1181 collectively) produced on record gave details of the various army personnel who were not granted extension and were retired on completion of their service. the details of the claimant are extracted hereunder:- 01 / nepali screened tulasa screened date of sos not 12 nationality 11 gurung feb nok for pension gtc (depot coy) 05 date of reporting in 14 date of pension docus 29 feb 12 05 jul extn pun .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2013
..... his treatment. page 25 of the documents (ex.a-2/1181 collectively) produced on record gave details of the various army personnel who were not granted extension and were retired on completion of their service. the details of the claimant are extracted hereunder:- 01 / nepali screened tulasa screened date of sos not 12 nationality 11 gurung feb nok for pension gtc (depot coy) 05 date of reporting in 14 date of pension docus 29 feb 12 05 jul extn pun .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-11-2013
..... ) was not specific as to which of the assailants used the knife to rob the complainant. he gave a general and vague statement that two of the boys put knife on the stomach of anil and did not assign any specific role to ram kumar. in the crossexamination he clarified that the nepali boy (who could not be arrested) had put knife on anil s abdomen. pw-2 (anil kumar), the complainant, merely deposed that all the four assailants had come along with long knives. he, however, was not specific ..... if ram kumar had used the knife to rob him. in the cross-examination he implicated ram kumar and one nepali boy who put knives on his abdomen. ram kumar was arrested after more than three months of the incident with a knife a separate case under section 25 arms act was registered which has resulted in acquittal. moreover, no worthful .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-11-2013
..... of complainant was well corroborated by confessional statement made by the appellant. it was further observed that there was huge recovery of contraband, as such, there must be strong reasons to falsely implicate the accused persons who are nepali nationals. the police officers have no ill will or motive to falsely implicate them in such a serious case.22. present case stands on a much different footing, inasmuch as, at the time of recovery two panch witnesses ..... judicial pronouncements it was observed that no rule of thumb can be laid down to arrive at a conclusion as to what is the effect of nonexamination of panch witnesses. each case has its own facts. in that case both the panch witnesses were nepali. they could not be examined being untraceable. the complainant supported the case of the prosecution. it was observed that there is no inkling in the evidence on record that the abovesaid witnesses nurtured any grouse against the appellants/accused persons. the deposition ..... hofiyani to mr. rajesh kumar, who then recorded the proceedings in english. that being so, it cannot be said that any prejudice was caused to the appellant. in gita lama tamang (supra) also a plea was taken that appellants were nepali nationals and were not conversant with english language. it was observed that if panchnama and confessional statements made by the accused under section 67 of ndps act are read in juxtaposition, no incongruities are to be located. nothing extra was included .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-07-2013
..... . 2.6 for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of commencement of the agreement, i.e., 13.02.2013, there was to be no purchase target, which the petitioner was required to achieve.3. the petitioner, avers that it sold 47 stents worth nepali rupees 21,46,723/- (inr1341,702/-). it is further stated that, the petitioner had placed orders in february and june 2013 in respect of 31 and 16 stents respectively. the petitioner claims that, it had also appointed a sub- distributor on 16 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-20-2013
..... to mislead the investigating agency. in view of the specific role ascribed to appellant raj kumar @ khujjar, we reject the contention raised on his behalf that he has been implicated falsely in place of one raju nepali.24. thus, relying on the testimony of pw-8 the factum and manner of the incident is fully established and we are inclined to support the trial court judgment in this regard. common intention 25 it is well settled that common intention implies a pre ..... far as it relates to discovery of any fact. raju nepali was never arrested. pw-8 in his cross-examination categorically stated that there were just three persons involved in the incident. his testimony, as stated above, is credible and worthy of reliance. such statements are sometime made by an accused ..... to spare his actual assailant(s) in order to falsely implicate someone. convincing evidence is required to discredit an injured witness. 23. the contention raised on behalf of the appellant raj kumar that he was falsely implicated in place of one raju nepali whose name also appeared in the disclosure statement made by the juvenile is also devoid of any merit for more than one reason. the disclosure statement which is in the form of a confessional statement is inadmissible in evidence. it is relevant so .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-20-2013
..... to mislead the investigating agency. in view of the specific role ascribed to appellant raj kumar @ khujjar, we reject the contention raised on his behalf that he has been implicated falsely in place of one raju nepali.24. thus, relying on the testimony of pw-8 the factum and manner of the incident is fully established and we are inclined to support the trial court judgment in this regard. common intention 25 it is well settled that common intention implies a pre ..... far as it relates to discovery of any fact. raju nepali was never arrested. pw-8 in his cross-examination categorically stated that there were just three persons involved in the incident. his testimony, as stated above, is credible and worthy of reliance. such statements are sometime made by an accused ..... to spare his actual assailant(s) in order to falsely implicate someone. convincing evidence is required to discredit an injured witness. 23. the contention raised on behalf of the appellant raj kumar that he was falsely implicated in place of one raju nepali whose name also appeared in the disclosure statement made by the juvenile is also devoid of any merit for more than one reason. the disclosure statement which is in the form of a confessional statement is inadmissible in evidence. it is relevant so .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Sep-11-2013
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no.7766 o 1. amit dey @ nepali dey @ amit kumar dey 2. bikram dey @ bikram kumar dey ...............petitioners versus state of jharkhand ... opposite party coram: honble mr.justice r.r.prasad for the petitioners: mr.indrajit sinha for the state : a.p.p .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-15-2013
..... in india. after the marriage, they continued to live as husband and wife and a daughter was born. the grievance of the husband was that the wife had failed to return to the matrimonial home which made him to file an application for restitution of conjugal rights. the trial court noticed that the husband was a nepali and he was not a domicile in india and therefore, he could not have invoked the provisions of the act. while interpreting sections 1(1) and 2(1) of the act, the court held that as regards the intra-territorial operation of the act, it is clear that it .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Jun-17-2013
..... counsel for the petitioner that some of the co-accused persons, who faced trial, have been acquitted by the trial court. the judgment of the trial court has been brought on record as annexure-2 to this bail application. in the facts of this case, i am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, nepali ganjhu @ nepali singh @ nepali ji @ gorai ganjhu, on bail. accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned addl. sessions ..... in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b. a. no. 1962 of 2013 nepali ganjhu @ nepali singh @ nepali ji @ gorai ganjhu ..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand .. opposite party -------- coram : honble mr. justice h. c. mishra ------ for the petitioner : mr. manoj kumar no.2, advocate for the state : a.p.p. ------ 3/ 17.06.2013 .....
Tag this Judgment!