Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Sep-02-2013
CRA NO.D-437-DB OF 200.1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRA NO.D-437-DB OF 200.DECIDED ON:02. 09.2013 1. Vinot Kumar son 2. Smt. Sumitra Devi daughter 3. Smt. Moti Devi wife of Ram Kumar, all residents of village Nidana, Tehsil and District Jind.................Appellants Versus State of Haryana ................Respondent CORAM HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.S.SARON HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.P.BANGARH Present Mr.Baldev Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sudhir Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.H.S.Sran, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent. S.P.BANGARH,J Case of the prosecution is that on 24.04.2004, at about 02:30 / 02:45 p.m, Kuldeep Singh (deceased).brother of Ishwar Singh, complainant was coming to his house from his 'gher', being followed by his brothers Ishwar Singh and Sushil at a distance of a half killa. When Kuldeep Singh (deceased) reached near the house of Vinot Kumar (appellant no.1) in street located in village Nidana, all the appellants emerged out ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH MONDAY,THE 2ND DAYOF SEPTEMBER 2013/11TH BHADRA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 2979 of 2013 (Z) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA 1810/2012 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 01-02-2013 PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 001. BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT/APPLICANT: -------------------------------------- M.M.JACOB S/O. M.V. MICHEL, AGED 56 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR/SECRETARY (RETIRED) KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES PENSION MACHIYANICKAL HOUSE P.O. PALA KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 575. THIS OP KERALAADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-09-2013, THE COURT ON ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:26. 8.2013 Judgment delivered on:30.8.2013 + CRL.A. 724/2009 RAKESH @ COMMANDO Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr.Siddhartha Das, Mr.Nitin Saluja, Mr.Shiv Pande, Mr.Shiv Chopra and Mr.Amit Singh Rathor, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Sunil Sharma, APP for the State. Inspector Kuldeep Singh, SHO, Defence Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 18.7.2009 and 31.7.2009 vide which he had been convicted for the offence under Section 302 IPC and had been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.3000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for three months. 2 Briefly stated the case of the prosecution is that on 25.7.2007 Kamal Kishore (PW-9) was celebrating his birthday at his residence A-25, Sadiq Nagar. He had invited h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-30-2013
$~01. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.APPEAL NO.1100/2010 Judgment reserved on 5th July , 2013 Judgment delivered on 30th August, 2013 % RAHUL KUMAR RAMAN BHAI CHOUDHARY ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Vijay Kumar and Mr.Rajiv Kumar, Advs. Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Richa Kapoor, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G.S.SISTANI, J 1.Challenge in this appeal, filed under Section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, is to the judgment dated 27.3.2009 and the order on sentence dated 27.3.2009 whereby the appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.20,000/- has been imposed for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC; rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act 1959. The appellant has further been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years for the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-30-2013
Rathore Poonam C.W.P.No.917 of 1998 -1- 2013.08.31 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.917 of 1998 Date of Decision:-30.08.2013 Smt.Raksha Rani Khosla ....Petitioner(s) versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER *** Present:- Mr.Ish Puneet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Nilesh Bhardwaj, DAG, Punjab. *** MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner is the wife of one Sh.H.L.Khosla, who had worked as a Maths Instructor with the respondent-Institution w.e.f.26.7.1965 to 2.5.1997. The respondent-Institution is an aided institution and receiving grants from the Government. The husband of the petitioner having died, the petitioner pressed for the legitimate service benefits such as gratuity, leave encashment and pension etc.It is not out of place to mention here that during his service tenure, the husband of the petitioner was initially contributing towa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-30-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.891 of 2011 Dated:18-04-2013 Lebaka Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. Late Yella Reddy, aged about 39 years, Occ: Business, R/o.D.No.1/299, Maruthi Naagar, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District.... PETITIONER Ambavaram Narayanamma, W/o. Late Lakshumaiah, aged about 75 years, Occ: Household affairs, R/o. Patha Kadapa Village, Kadapa, Kadapa District and others....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. S.V. MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR. R. PRASAD - R20 TO R25 MR. V. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY - R9 TO R13 MR. V.R. REDDY KOVVURI - R28 & R29 HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1. 2012 AIR SCW42482. AIR1973SC5693. AIR2003SC2674. 2011 (4) ALD43(SC) 5. 2013 (30 ALD7156. (2013) 5 SCC3977. (2007) 10 SCC719The Court made the following: ORDER: This revision is preferred by the proposed party, who sought impleadment in a suit, being O.S.No.38 of 2006, for partition, as defendant No.24 vide I.A.No.1161 of 2010, which was rejected by the Co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013 5TH BHADRA, 1935 MACA.No. 2402 of 2010 ( ) -------------------------- AGAINST THE AWARD IN OPMV 108 2008 of M.A.C.T.,KOZHIKODE DATED 18 11-2009 APPELLANT(S)/CLAIMANTS: -------------------------------------------- 1. A.ABOOBACKERKOYA, S/O.MAMMAD HAJI, AGED 4 YEARS, "RAFA" ANDIYERI, KONGANNOOR, ATHLI KOZHIKODE.2. MUHAMMED NABEEL, S/O.A.ABOOBACKERKOYA, AGED 1 YEARS, "RAFA" ANDIYERI, KONGANNOOR, ATHLI KOZHIKODE.3. NILFUR, AGED 1 YEARS, D/O.A.ABOOBACKERKOYA, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHERAND GUARDIAN.A.ABOOBACKERKOYA, "RAFA" ANDIYERI, KONGANNOOR, ATHLI KOZHIKODE.4. HANAN, AGED 1 YEARS, D/O.A.ABOOBACKERKOYA, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHERAND GUARDIAN.A.ABOOBACKERKOYA, "RAFA" ANDIYERI, KONGANNOOR, ATHLI KOZHIKODE. BY ADVS.SRI.K.M.FIROZ SMT.M.SHAJNA RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: -----------------...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Aug-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013 5TH BHADRA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 2771 of 2013 (Z) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 17 12-2012 IN TA 487/2012 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER(S):/APPLICANT -------------------------- DENCY MATHEW, SENIOR CIVIL POLICE OFFICER NO.6815 CENTRAL POLICE STATION ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SMT.NISHA BOSE RESPONDENT(S):/RESPONDENTS ---------------------------- 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO HOME (H) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 001. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM RANGE, ERNAKULAM 011. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, COCHIN CITY, CITY POLICE OFFICE, KOCHI CITY, PIN 017. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MATTANCHERRY 001. BY ADV.SHRI.NOBLE MATHEW, SR.GOV...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Aug-27-2013
ORDER SHEET CS No.314 of 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE NAINI PLYWOOD PVT.LTD.Versus MARKENDEYA PLYWOOD PVT.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :27. h August, 2013. Ms.Siddiqua Parveen, Adv..for the plaintiff Mr.Chayan Gupta, Adv.Mr.Rajesh Upadhyay, Adv..for the defendant The Court: The written statement filed by the defendant contains various defects as pointed out by the Master and Official Referee in his report dated 23rd August, 2013 and the Advocates-on-Record on behalf of the defendant seems to have taken no steps to remove such defects. This Court has noticed that a practice has developed that the Advocateson-Record for the parties are not following the procedure prescribed in the Original Side Rules of this Court and they are let off for their negligent conduct on a misplaced philanthropy shown by the Court. The written statement appears to have been filed on 11th November, 2011 with as many as eight defects. Th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-23-2013
W.P.No.13792/2013 (N.S.Rathore versus State of MP and otheRs.23.08.2013 Heard Smt. Amrit Ruprah, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 15.07.2013 by which he has been transferred as Panchayat Secretary from Gram Panchayat Khamariya, Tahsil and Janpad Panchayat Dhanora District Seoni to Gram Panchayat Bega Pipariya, Janpad Panchayat, Lakhnadoun. It is submitted that the impugned orders are contrary to Clause 4 of the transfer policy which provides for transferring a Panchayat Secretary to an adjacent Gram Panchayat. The petitioner also alleges violation of the other clauses of the policy. A Division Bench of this Court in R.S.Chaudhary versus State of M.P.and OtheRs.ILR [2007].MP 132.has already held that in case transfer is alleged to be contrary to the policy, the appropriate remedy of the petitioner is to approach the authority themselves by filing a representation. In ...
Tag this Judgment!