Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE27H DAY OF SEPTEMBER20135TH ASWINA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 3217 of 2013 (Z) ---------------------------- TA. NO.5946/2012 OF KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. .......... PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. HAREES K.P., S/O. SAIDALI K.P., KAKKATTU PARAMBIL HOUSE, NATTUKAL P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 583.2. DHANYA T.K., D/O. T.K. KUNJUNJU, THATTUMPURATH HOUSE, PERUVA P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 610.3. FEMINA P., D/O. MOHAMMED P., PULIKKAL HOUSE, PERUMPOYIL, P.O. CHANDAKKUNNU, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679 342.4. REMYA K., D/O.T.S. KRISHNAN KUTTY, KAKKARA HOUSE, ANGADIPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679 321.5. RUKSANA P.,D/O. VEEERANKUTTY HAJI, CHEERAKKOLIL HOUSE, PERUMPARAMB, P.O. UGRAPURAM, AREACODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.6. ANUPAMA C., D/O. LATE A. NARAYANAN NAMBEESAN, ARAVANGAVU NHAVALLIYIL, MAVAKK...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH FRIDAY,THE27H DAY OF SEPTEMBER20135TH ASWINA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 3331 of 2013 (Z) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN OA4782013 of KERALAADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, DATED0304-2013 PETITIONER : - ---------------------- KERALA GOVT.AYURVEDA PHARMACIST'S ASSOCIATION, CENTRAL COMMITTEE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (REG NO20278), REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT P.K. WILSON, AGED54YEARS, S/O P.M. KRISHNAN, PHARMACIST GR II, DISTRICT AYURVEDA HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682018 AND RESIDING AT GEETHA BHAVAN, MLA ROAD, PUTHIYAKAVU, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM68230. BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS : - -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM69500.2. THE DIRECTOR, INDIAN SYSTEMS OF MEDICINE. THIRUVANANTHA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH FRIDAY,THE27H DAY OF SEPTEMBER20135TH ASWINA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 3331 of 2013 (Z) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN OA4782013 of KERALAADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, DATED0304-2013 PETITIONER : - ---------------------- KERALA GOVT.AYURVEDA PHARMACIST'S ASSOCIATION, CENTRAL COMMITTEE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (REG NO20278), REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT P.K. WILSON, AGED54YEARS, S/O P.M. KRISHNAN, PHARMACIST GR II, DISTRICT AYURVEDA HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682018 AND RESIDING AT GEETHA BHAVAN, MLA ROAD, PUTHIYAKAVU, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM68230. BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS : - -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM69500.2. THE DIRECTOR, INDIAN SYSTEMS OF MEDICINE. THIRUVANANTHA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
Decided on : Sep-27-2013
On appeal from: Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown (Makaula and Griffiths JJ sitting as court of appeal): The appeal is upheld with costs. The order of the high court is set aside and replaced with the following: The appeal is dismissed with costs. JUDGMENT CACHALIA JA (LEACH, MAJIEDT, PETSE AND WILLIS JJA CONCURRING): [1] The Close Corporations Act 69 of 1984 (the Act) permits a deregistered close corporation to have its registration restored. When that occurs, s 26(7) of the Act says that the corporation shall continue to exist and be deemed to have continued in existence as from the date of deregistration as if it were not deregistered (emphasis added). The issue in this appeal concerns whether or not this provision has the effect of retrospectively validating an invalid summons issued by a close corporation after deregistration so as to interrupt the running of prescription.A magistrate held that the provision had that effect, but the high court came to the contrary conclusion. W...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Sep-25-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1584/2013 ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., Jaipur vs. Smt. Narayani Devi & Ors. Date of Judgement 25th September, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Vinay Kothari, for the appellant. ---- BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the appellant. This appeal is directed against judgment and award dated 06.06.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaitaran ('the Tribunal'), whereby, for the death of one Kuldeep Singh, compensation to the tune of Rs.18,10,800/- alongwith interest has been awarded by the Tribunal. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that excessive compensation has been awarded by the Tribunal as amount under various heads have been awarded without taken into consideration the facts involved in the present case. The award of compensation under the head of future prospects was contested. It was also submitted that three broth...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE24H DAY OF SEPTEMBER20132ND ASWINA, 1935 W.P.(C).No.23252 of 2013 (F) ----------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- NABIEL MATHEW CHERIAN, AGED30YEARS, S/O.MATHEW CHERIAN, MUNDANICAL HOUSE MANARCAUD P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 019. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.AJITHKUMAR (VALATH). RESPONDENTS:- -------------------------- 1. THE REGISTERING AUTHORITY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, KOTTYAM, COLLECTORATE BUILDING, KOTTAYAM.2. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001. R1 & R2 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MUHAMMED SHAFI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2409-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23252 of 2013 (F) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF SALE CERTIFIC...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Sep-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED2409.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.R.K.AGRAWAL, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.12534 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 R.Gandhi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. By its Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. 3.The Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents, their men, agents or their subordinates from in any manner restricting the public from honoring to the Father of Nation Mahatma Gandhi statute at Marina Beach from morning on the day of death and birth anniversary viz., 30th January and 2nd October respectively of every forthcoming year except 10 to 15 minutes of restriction for the visit of Governor and Chief Minister. For ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-20-2013
..... role ascribed to appellant raj kumar @ khujjar, we reject the contention raised on his behalf that he has been implicated falsely in place of one raju nepali.24. thus, relying on the testimony of pw-8 the factum and manner of the incident is fully established and we are inclined to support the trial ..... is in the form of a confessional statement is inadmissible in evidence. it is relevant so far as it relates to discovery of any fact. raju nepali was never arrested. pw-8 in his cross-examination categorically stated that there were just three persons involved in the incident. his testimony, as stated above, ..... to discredit an injured witness. 23. the contention raised on behalf of the appellant raj kumar that he was falsely implicated in place of one raju nepali whose name also appeared in the disclosure statement made by the juvenile is also devoid of any merit for more than one reason. the disclosure statement which ..... the learned counsel for the appellant raj kumar @ khujjar has stated that in the disclosure statement of the juvenile, name of one raju nepali, as being involved in the incident also surfaced. there is every possibility that the appellant raj kumar @ khujjar was mistaken in place of raju ..... nepali and was implicated in the case falsely.17. in the alternative, the learned counsel for the appellants have urged that even if the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-20-2013
..... role ascribed to appellant raj kumar @ khujjar, we reject the contention raised on his behalf that he has been implicated falsely in place of one raju nepali.24. thus, relying on the testimony of pw-8 the factum and manner of the incident is fully established and we are inclined to support the trial ..... is in the form of a confessional statement is inadmissible in evidence. it is relevant so far as it relates to discovery of any fact. raju nepali was never arrested. pw-8 in his cross-examination categorically stated that there were just three persons involved in the incident. his testimony, as stated above, ..... to discredit an injured witness. 23. the contention raised on behalf of the appellant raj kumar that he was falsely implicated in place of one raju nepali whose name also appeared in the disclosure statement made by the juvenile is also devoid of any merit for more than one reason. the disclosure statement which ..... the learned counsel for the appellant raj kumar @ khujjar has stated that in the disclosure statement of the juvenile, name of one raju nepali, as being involved in the incident also surfaced. there is every possibility that the appellant raj kumar @ khujjar was mistaken in place of raju ..... nepali and was implicated in the case falsely.17. in the alternative, the learned counsel for the appellants have urged that even if the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Sep-17-2013
Crl. Misc. A No.986 MA of 2012(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. A No.986 MA of 2012(O&M) Date of decision:17. 09.2013 Krishna Rani ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal -.- Present: Mr. S.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the appellant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Rekha Mittal, J.The present appeal along with an application for appeal has been directed against judgment dated 15.10.2012, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, whereby the accused (respondents No.2 to 7 herein) have been acquitted of the charge framed against them. The facts relevant for the disposal of the present appeal are that Krishna Rani, mother of Sunanda, married to Yashpal on 17.02.1995 at Richi Rich Restaurant, Delhi, filed a criminal case FIR No....
Tag this Judgment!