Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD WEDNESDAY, THE11H DAYOF SEPTEMBER201320TH BHADRA, 1935 WP(C).No. 21951 of 2013 (T) ----------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY PROF. P.O.J.LABBA.2. DR.P.A.FAZAL GAFOOR, AGED56YEARS S/O.LATE DR.P.K.ABDUL GAFOOR, PADIYATH HOUSE KANNUR ROAD, KOZHIKODE.3. M.E.S.MEDICAL COLLEGE PERINTHALMANNA, PALACHUVADU.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, DR.P.A.FAZAL GAFOOR. BY ADVS.SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD SRI.KANDAMPULLY RAHUL SRI.MITHUN BABY JOHN SRI.J.RAMKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATEOF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHAND FAMILY WELFARE GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 001.2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION THIRUVANANTH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Sep-11-2013
Crl. Misc. No.M-22775 of 2012 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No.M-22775 of 2012 Date of Decision: September 11, 2013 Jamsheeda and others ---Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ---Respondents Coram: Hon'ble MRS.Justice Rekha Mittal Present: Mr.P.L.Verma, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Param Preet Singh Paul, DAG, Punjab for respondent-State. Ms.Vandana, Advocate, for respondent No.2 *** REKHA MITTAL, J. The petitioners pray for quashing of FIR No.488 dated 10.10.2011 for offence under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector-55, Faridabad and proceedings emanating therefrom. Jamsheeda wife of Arshad, Sarjeen wife of Jakkir and Mubina wife of Mubarik are married sisters of Mubin with whom the complainant performed marriage on 2.4.2006 as per muslim law. Tofeek, petitioner No.4 is the younger brother of Mubin, the main accused in the case. Counsel for the petitioners submits that Mubin divorced his wife complainant Sha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Sep-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.58 of 2012 =========================================================== 1. Harendra Raut S/O Bhola Raut Resident Of Village- Gonauli, P.S- Bettiah Muffashil, District- West Champaran .... .... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : M/S Sanjeev Kumar, U.P. Singh & Shyamal Prakash. Advocates. For the Respondent/s : Mr. S. N. Prasad (A.P.P.) =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date:10. 09-2013 The solitary appellant has preferred this appeal against his conviction for the offence under sections 20 (ii) C, 22 and 23 of the N.D.P.S. Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten years for all the three offences besides a fine of Rupee one lac for the offence under section 23 , in default of which further R.I. for one year as awar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-06-2013
M.S. Sanklecha, J. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( the Act) from the order dated 25 April 2012 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) relates to assessment year 200607. 2) On 25 September 2012 this appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- 1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, an investment made in the shares of a private limited company for purposes of acquiring control over the business conducted by it, can be said to be stock-in-trade and not a capital asset especially when the shares were not freely transferable and were held by the assessee for 31 months? 2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal's finding that the appellant had purchased the shares of Millennium Alcobev Pvt. Ltd. with the object of trading in them and not to hold as a capital asset is perverse and such that no person reasonably instructed as to the facts and the law co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-04-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:4. 09.2013 + CRL.A. No.432 /2010 NARESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Ms.AshaTiwari, Advocate versus STATE Through: + CRL.A. No. 321/2010 ARUN KUMAR @ HANNI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State ..... Appellant Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State AND + CRL.A. No. 717/2010 SANJIV @ SANJAY @ MANJAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR CRL.A. Nos.432 /321/717 of 2010 Page 1 JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this order we propose to decide three separate Criminal Appeals preferred by Naresh Kumar, Arun Kumar and Sanjeev, accused in FIR No. 965/07 to challenge the judgment dated 11.02.2009 and or...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAYOF SEPTEMBER 2013/13TH BHADRA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 2421 of 2013 (Z) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN OA 1060/2013 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 26-06-2013 PETITIONER/3RD RESPONDENT IN OA: ------------------------------------------------------- SHAILAJA.M. VOCATIONAL INSTRUCTOR IN A & A, GVHSS, KADAVOOR ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 001. BY ADVS.SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J.SRI.T.G.SUNIL (PRANAVAM) SRI.K.R.GANESH RESPONDENTS/APPLICANT & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN OA: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. OMANA.K.C. W/O.G.P.PRAKASH INSTRUCTOR IN ACCOUNTANCY AND AUDITNG GOVERNENT VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL (BOYS) PERUVA P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 610 RESIDING AT KATTACHIRAKUNNEL, PERUVA P.O. KOTTAYAM-686 610.2. STATEOF KERALA REPRESENTED BY TH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE4H DAY OF SEPTEMBER201313TH BHADRA, 1935 WP(C).No. 17536 of 2013 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- 1. ABDUL KAREEM M.A., PROPRIETOR OF MADAVANA INDUSTRIES, S/O.ABDUL KHADER MADAVANAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ELOOKARA, MUPPATHADOM P.O. ALUVA10-683 110 2. SHANAVAS K.M., PROPRIETOR OF ROYAL INDUSTRIES, KUNNAMPURATHU HOUSE THAIKKATTU KARA, ALUVA - 683 106.3. GEORGE V.T., PROPRIETOR OF SPARK BRICKS INDUSTRIES S/O.V.V.THOMAS, VELIKKAKATHU HOUSE, PERUMPADARI P.O. MANARKKADU, PALAKKAD-678011.4. PRINCE M.G., DIRECTOR OF DEW POND TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LTD. S/O.M.GOPALAN, SITHARA, NI.T.P.O. KOZHIKODE, PIN673601.5. NOUSHAD.V.S., PROPRIETOR OF NOBLE TECH INDUSTRIES, S/O.V.P.SAITH VALIYAPARAMBIL, NEERIKODE, ALANGAD ERNAKULAM-683 104. BY ADVS.SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN SMT.JAYASREE MANOJ SRI.JITHIN PAUL VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE4H DAY OF SEPTEMBER201313TH BHADRA, 1935 RP.No. 329 of 2013 ----------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN LA.App. NO. 725/2011 DATED0703-2012 .... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENTS1TO5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. SREEKUMAR, RESIDING AT 'SREYAS', TC21460, JUDGE ROAD, KARAMANA PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695002.2. RAJ KUMAR, RESIDING AT 'ASOKA'MINICHIN ROAD, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695014.3. SANTHOSH KUMAR, RESIDING AT 'PONNU', TC21159(1), JUDGE ROAD, KARAMANA PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695002.4. P.S.GOPAKUMAR, RESIDING AT 'SREYAS'TC21460, JUDGE ROAD, KARAMANA PO., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695002.5. THANKI, RESIDING AT 'SANTHOSH', NEAR COSMOPOLITAN HOSPITAL,MURINJAPALAM, KUMARAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM683565. BY ADVS.SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL SRI.A.CHANDRA BABU RESPONDENT...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-03-2013
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on:03. 09.2013 + RC. Rev. No.247/2013 & C.M. No.10716/2013 (for stay) THE PUNJAB STATE CO-OPERATIVE SUPPLY & MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED (M/S MARKFED) ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Brijender Chahar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vineet Bhagat & Mr.Akash Tyagi, Advs. along with Mr.Shiv Kumar, Senior Manager (Law) in person. versus AMIT GOEL & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. and Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Lalit Gupta, Ms.Payal Gupta & Mr.Ashish Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of the present petition under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the petitioner has assailed the order dated 13th May, 2013 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (04), South, New Delhi in an eviction petition filed by the respondents (petitioners therein) in respect of House no. C-212 Defence Colony, New Delhi 110024 (hereinafter ref...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Sep-02-2013
CRA-D No.781-DB of 2006 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:02.09.2013 CRA-D No.781-DB of 2006 (O&M) Arun @ Shankar .... Appellant Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CRA-D No.817-DB of 2006 (O&M) Sunil @ Sukha .... Appellant Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CRR No.2547 of 2012 Ashok @ Shauki .... Petitioner versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CRM No.53-MA of 2007 (O&M) State of Haryana .... Appellant Versus Sandeep @ Kala .... Respondent CRM No.604-MA of 2007 (O&M) State of Haryana .... Appellant Versus Ravi Kant .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY Present: Mr. Bijender Dhankhar, Advocate with Mr. B.S.Chahar, Advocate for the appellant in CRA-D No.781-DB of 2006 and as Amicus Curiae in CRA-D No.817-DB of 2006. Bura Sonia 2013.09.16 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRA-D No.781-DB of 2006 -2- Mr. G.S.Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner in CRR...
Tag this Judgment!