Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 section 23 rules Court: delhi Page 4 of about 806 results (0.204 seconds)

Ashok Kumar Bhatnagar Vs. Shabnam Bhatnagar

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi122; 1989(16)DRJ105

..... conduct that was responsible for respondent's decision not to come back, smacked of mis-appreciation of evidence. (19) learned counsel made reference also to a division bench judgment of karnataka high court in the case of n.b. rukmam v. p.m. srinivasa air 1984 kar 131, to argue that the inference as to whether a party had animus deserendi ..... without just cause.'(35) respondent further supported her plea that it was for the appellant as petitioner to prove desertion on her part by relying on a db judgment of karnataka high court reported as n.b. rukmini v. p.m. srinivasa air 1984 kar 131, wherein it was laid down :- 'the ingredients of legal desertion are- (i) the factum of .....

B.L. and Co. and Others Vs. Pfizer Products Incl.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT346

..... for which he could not be adequately compensated. the court must weigh one need against another and determine where the 'balance of convenience' lies.'the interlocutory remedy is intended to preserve in status quo, the rights of parties which may appear on a prima facie case. the court also, in restraining a defendant from exercising what he considers his legal right .....

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. A.K. Tandon and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1992)103CTR(Del)42; ILR1992Delhi996; [1992]198ITR26(Delhi)

..... the proper interpretation of the relevant provisions prior to the subsequent legislation. counsel cites cit v. deepchand kishanlal : [1990]183itr299(kar) which is a judgment of the karnataka high court and page 559 of the same volume which is a judgment of the supreme court in cit v. p. doraiswamy chetty : [1990]183itr559(sc) ..... the aforesaid earlier decision of the same court. it was further noted that (purushothamdas gocooldas : [1976]104itr608(mad) had already been distinguished in the judgments of the karnataka and patna high courts referred to here in before including that of the madhya pradesh high court reported in narsibhai patel v. cwt : [1981]127itr633(mp) , and ..... by the firm. the assessed who are partners in the said firm, messrs. wengers and co., filed appeals before the tribunal. the tribunal, relying on the judgments of the karnataka high court reported in cwt v. mrs. christen cardoza : [1978]114itr532(kar) , of the orissa high court reported in cwt v. i. butchi krishna : [1979 .....

Kiran Sharma Vs. Shardha Nand Sharma

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 44(1991)DLT90; I(1991)DMC402

..... , it is conceded that the belief in the correctness/truth of the allegations will exonerates the spouse making such allegations as held in s. (swayamprabha v. a.s. chandrashekhar, air karnataka 295)'s. as noticed in the earlier part of this judgment, this principle has been spelled out by the learned single judge in the impugned judgment itself and none of .....

Roshanara Begum Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 61(1996)DLT206; 1996(36)DRJ34

..... the functions of the legislature, it is found necessary to read the conjunctions 'or and 'and' one for the other.(102) the supreme court in m.satyanarayana v. state of karnataka a.i.r. 1986 s c 7762 has laid down that a statute cannot be construed merely with reference to grammar. statute, whenever the language permits, must be construed reasonably .....

Tobu Enterpries Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Lt. Governor, Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1993IVAD(Delhi)609; 53(1994)DLT255; 1994(28)DRJ515; [1994(68)FLR615]; (1994)ILLJ1221Del

..... a complaint, mr. vohra said he was supported by three decisions of views high courts, namely, s.s. hada v. the binny ltd. staff association, 1989 lab.i.c. 165 (karnataka, full bench); ramdass and others (oriental gas company) v. km. sen, : (1956)iillj323cal (calcutta, d.b.); and state of kerala and mary c.nidhiri chacko, : (1961)iillj569ker (kerala, ..... be authorised by the government to file a complaint in a court of law. (15) with due respect to the view expressed by the full bench of the karnataka high court we find ourselves in disagreement with the same. appropriate government has either to file a complaint itself under section 34 or the complaint could be filed under ..... supreme court in ishwar singh bagga : [1987]1scr300 and, it would appear, that this judgment of the supreme court was not referred to before the full bench of the karnataka high court. (16) we are, thereforee of the view that under section 34 of the i.d. act the complaint for an offence under that act except section 30 .....

The Commissioner of Wealth-tax, New Delhi Vs. A.K. Tandon

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1992(22)DRJ334

Arun Kumar, J.(1) This judgment will dispose of bunch of references under Section 27 of the wealth Tax Act 1989, pending in this Court.(2) The assesseds are partners in a firm known s M/s Wengers and Co. which owns -15 and A-16, Connaught Place, New Delhi, known as Wengers Building. The Wealth Tax Officer while making the assessment accepted, the assesseds' claim that in respect of the assesseds share in the said immoveable property owned by the firm, he was entitled to exemption under Section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth Tax Act 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). However, the Commissioner of Wealth Tax was of the opinion that the order of the Wealth Tax Officer allowing the exemption under Section 5(1)(iv) to the extent of rupees one lac was erroneous and, thereforee, ..he served a notice on the assesses to show cause why the same should not be cancelled and assessment be not made afresh by withdrawing the benefit of the exemption under Section 5(1)(iv) of the Act. The Commissioner ...

Continental Construction Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas268(Delhi); (1990)85CTR(Del)116; [1990]185ITR178(Delhi)

..... 40(c) applied or section 40a(5) in the case of working directors who were posted outside india. 83. in international instruments pvt. ltd. v. cit : [1981]130itr315(kar) , the karnataka high court came to the conclusion that the first proviso to section 40a(5)(a) of the act refers to expenditure incurred in respect of an employee or a former .....

Indian Aluminum Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1993(12)ELT349(Del)

..... said business the company owns three aluminum smelting plants at hirakund in the state of orissa, at alupuram in the state of kerala and at belgaum in the state of karnataka. by virtue of the aluminum (control) order, 1970, promulgated under section 3 of the essential commodities act, 1955, the central government has been given the power to regulate the sale .....

Arvind Khanna Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... ordinance, to take advantage of the provisions of the repealed ordinance, is not a right accrued. sub-section (2) of section 31 of the act was not intended to preserve abstract rights conferred by the repealed ordinance .. 14. what were the "things done" or "action taken" under the repealed ordinance? the high court rightly observes that there ..... magistrate to apply his mind to the contents of the charge-sheet. such application of mind on his part should have been reflected from the order. [see state of karnataka and anr. v. pastor p. raju 2006crilj4045 and pawan kumar sharma v. state of uttaranchal." 43. also in sms pharmaceuticals ltd vs. neeta bhalla and anr., ( ..... . 34. to strengthen his arguments, on the issue raised above, learned senior counsel has relied upon the decision of the apex court rendered in m.s. shivananda vs. karnataka state road transport corporation and ors., (1980) 1 scc 149, wherein it has been held as under:- "13. it is settled both on principle and authority, that .....