Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 section 23 rules Court: delhi Page 2 of about 806 results (0.121 seconds)

Playboy Enterprises, Inc. Vs. Bharat Malik and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)356; 91(2001)DLT321; 2001(2)RAJ236

..... prb act being a special act has precedence over the provisions of the tmm act. the prb act is an act for regulation of printing press and newspapers for preservation of copies of books and newspapers.10. it is averred that the plaintiff has no right to publish the newspaper in india and their registered title under the ..... the financial times limited initially obtained an ex parte stay against the times publishing house limited from the city civil court, bangalore but in appeal the high court of karnataka set aside the orders of the civil city court. the defendant has not only disputed the reputation of the playboy magazine but denied that the playboy magazine spans across ..... the comparison of the object of the aforesaid two acts. the preamble of prb act shows that it was made for regulating printing presses and newspapers, for preservation of copies of every book and registration of such books and newspapers. thus the main concern of the legislature was to enact a law which would help in .....

T and T Motors Ltd Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Delhi

..... ' occurring under section 37(3a), necessarily should involve the element of publicity and advertisement to popularize or increase sales..15. the supreme court in eskayef vs. commissioner of income tax, karnataka-ii, bangalore, (2000) 6 scc 451, approved the view taken in smith kline and french's case (supra) and held that in the case of prescription drugs, the target of ..... understood and treated as sales promotion or publicity expenses. ita 899/2010 page 7 of 15.14. in smith kline and french (india) ltd. vs. cit, (1992) 193 itr 582 (karnataka), it has been held that in normal commercial sense and in common parlance sales promotion and publicity are activities to gain goodwill in market. these need not be confined to .....

AmruddIn Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... well as his understanding of the obligation of an oath. the decision of the trial court may, however, be disturbed by the higher court if from what is preserved in the records, it is clear that his conclusion was erroneous. this precaution is necessary because child witnesses are amenable to tutoring and often live in a world ..... prudence considers such evidence with close scrutiny and only on being convinced about the quality thereof and reliability can record conviction, based thereon. [vide surya narayana v. state of karnataka, 2001 (1) supreme 1]..33. the issue came up for consideration before hon ble supreme court in state of madhya pradesh v. ramesh and anr., (2011) 4 ..... (8) scc775 trimukh morati kirkan vs. state of maharashtra, (2006) 10 scc681 ujjagar singh vs. state of punjab, (2007) 13 scc90 anthony d souza and ors. vs. state of karnataka, (2003) 1 scc259 lakhan singh @ pappu vs. the state of nct of delhi, manu/de/3606/2011; arvind @ chootu vs. state, ilr (2009) suppl. delhi 704.10. .....

Delhi Stock Exchange and anr. Vs. K.C. Sharma and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002VIIAD(Delhi)432; 98(2002)DLT234

..... kumar maheshwari v. union of india, : air1992delhi68 , a division bench of this court has held that the stock exchange exercises the function of public character. the karnataka decision was also based on a concession that the delhi stock exchange is not a public authority.38. there exists a distinction between a statutory authority and a public ..... an agency or instrumentality of the state so as to come within the purview of 'other authorities' in article 12 of the constitution.'35. it may be true that the karnataka, kerala and madras high courts in r. jagadeesh kumar v. p. srinivasan, : air1995kant420 , satish nayak v. cochin stock exchange ltd., air 1975 ker 373 and ..... scr 398 it was held that a school is also a state within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution of india. in mohini jain v. state of karnataka, : [1992]3scr658 , having regard to the state's obligation to provide education, it was held that the educational institutions carry on the supplementary sovereign functions. it .....

Syndicate of the Press of the Universtiy of Cambridge on Behalf of the ...

Court : Delhi

..... moment a work is created. when the copyright expires at the end of the statutory period, the work becomes part of the public domain. until section 514, every statutory scheme preserved the same sequence. a work progressed from 1) creation; 2) to copyright; 3) to the public domain. under section 514, the copyright sequence no longer necessarily ends with the public .....

National Assn. of Motion Pictures Exhibitors, Delhi Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1983Delhi691

Sachar, J. (1) Does Delhi Administration lack competency in law to fix rates for admission to Cinematograph exhibition in Cinema houses notwithstanding the extension of the Punjab Cinemas Regulations Act, 1952 (hereinafter to be called the Punjab Act 1952), as at present in force in State of Haryana to Delhi by means of notification dated 21-11-1980 iss,ued by the Central Government under Section 2 of the Union Territories (Laws Act), 1950 (hereinafter to be called the 1950 Act) is the main question that calls for determination in this batch of writ petitions. (2) The points in all these writ petitions are similar and broadly we shall be taking the fact from the representative petition to which the counsel for the petitioners referred namely Cw 959182. It is a common case that the decision in the present writ petition will also govern the decisions in the other writ petitions. (3) Article 245 of the Constitution empowers the Parliament to make laws for the whole or any part of the terr...

Sushil Kumari Dang Vs. Prem Kumar Dang

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1976Delhi321; 13(1977)DLT279b; 1976RLR487

..... of cohabitation; halsbury's laws of england, third edition, vol. 12, page 285. 19. it will be appreciated, thereforee, that this remedy of restitution of conjugal rights is aimed at preserving the marriage and not at disrupting it as in the case of divorce or judicial separation. the court cannot enforce sexual intercourse, but only cohabitation, and restitution of conjugal rights ..... with infidelity. a charge of adultery makes the marriage state impossible to be endured. life itself becomes unendurable and the discharge of marriage duties impossible.32. restitution aims at the preservation of marriage. an accusation such as this strikes at the very foundation of matrimony. it destroys that close and intimate union we call marriage. marriage is a union of one .....

Bharti Televentures Ltd. Vs. Dss Enterprises Private Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2005(2)ARBLR561(Delhi); 123(2005)DLT532

..... arb. & con. act could have explicitly ousted the jurisdiction of civil courts, but fails to do so. on the contrary, section 8 of the arb. & con. act preserves it, since a suit can/must continue unless the application envisaged in this provision has been preferred. sections 8, 45 and article ii (3) of new york convention are ..... points raised and decided by the court in a given case'. the constitution bench has also reiterated the view in islamic academy of education and anr. v. state of karnataka and ors., : air2003sc3724 , that the ratio decidendi of a judgment can be obtained only from a reading of its entirety. this is also the opinion of the ..... examples, the principles laid down in ryland v. fletcher, donoghue v. stevenson, central london property trust ltd. v. high trees house ltd. 1947 k.b. 130 : [1956] i all er 256 (now known simply as high trees in which the principle of promissory estoppal was established) and mareva v. international bulk carriers (1980) 1 all er 213 (thenceforward .....

Rajesh Kumar Yadav Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT493

..... acquired by it. the government may drag its feet even on taking-over possession of illegal colonies and defer demolition of illegal and unauthorised structures. but courts must uphold and preserve the rule of law. since we find no legal infirmity with the actions of the government taken under sections 4 and 6 of the act, we would dismiss these writ ..... required to be read in their entirety. a judgment, it is well settled, cannot be read as a statute. (see sarat chandra mishra v. state of orissa and state of karnataka v. c. lalitha). construction of a judgment, it is well settled, should be made in the light of the factual matrix involved therein. what is more important is to see .....

Pfizer Products Inc. Vs. B.L. and Company and ors.,

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002(25)PTC262(Del)

..... this stage would not be appropriate. in the case of wander ltd. versus antox india p. ltd. reported in the court held as under:- 'the interlocutory remedy is intended to preserve in status quo, the rights of parties which may appear on a prima facie case. the court also, in restraining a defendant from exercising what he considers his legal right ..... 1992 fsr 313 the court similarly held that:-'where the other factors appear to be evenly balanced it is counsel of prudence to take such measures as are calculated to preserve the status quo. if the defendant is enjoined temporarily from doing something that he has not done before,the only effect of the interlocutory injunction in the even of his .....