Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 section 23 rules Court: delhi Page 9 of about 806 results (0.094 seconds)

Surajit Nundy and Others Vs. Management of Mirambika Free Progress Sch ...

Court : Delhi

..... of article 19(1)(a); (xxxvi) unni krishnan, j.p. vs. state of andhra pradesh (1993) 1 scc 645 was overruled in t.m.a. pai foundation vs. state of karnataka (2002) 8 scc 481; (xxxvii) that article 21 overrides fundamental rights; attention in this regard was invited to in re: noise pollution - implementation of the laws for restricting use of ..... within the locality, it is deemed to be prohibited. reliance was placed on ramchandra ganpat shinde vs. state of maharashtra (1993) 4 scc 216, mahadevappa lachappa kinagi vs. state of karnataka (2008) 12 scc 418 and indian bank vs. m/s. satyam fibres (india) pvt. ltd. (1996) 5 scc 550 as to the powers of writ court on finding a fraud .....

Tribunal at Its Own Motion Vs. the Secretary Ministry of Environment a ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... national board for wildlife. 28. considering all the above issues one can safely conclude that wildlife and its habitats are part and parcel of environment and preservation of environment shall form the centre stage of implementation of management practices and therefore it is for the authorities to examine how far the existing dolomite mines ..... others further stated: "article 21 of the constitution of india protects not only the human rights but also casts an obligation on human beings to protect and preserve a species becoming extinct, conservation and protection of environment is an inseparable part of right to life". (emphasis supplied) 34. considering the above, we direct ..... still occurring in various parts of the country. it is reported that in the landscape nearer to the central western ghats which consists of forests in karnataka and adjacent parts of kerala and tamil nadu and also in the badhavgarh tiger reserve in madhya pradesh there is highest concentration of tigers in the wild .....

Joginder Kaur (Gogi) and Another Vs. Prit Pal Singh

Court : Delhi

I.S. Mehta, J. 1. The appellant-wife, i.e., Smt. Joginder Kaur (Gogi), under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has preferred MAT.APP.(F.C.)No.52/2014 aggrieved from the judgment and divorce decree dated 26th February, 2014 in HMA No. 516/2011. She has also preferred MAT.APP.(FC)No.72/2014 partially challenging the order dated 26th February, 2014 in maintenance petition M No. 132/12 passed by the Family Court, Dwarka, New Delhi. Inasmuch as the two appeals rest on identical facts, the appeals have been taken together for consideration. 2. The facts giving rise to the two appeals are briefly noted. The parties before us were married in accordance with Sikh rites and customs on 22nd February, 2008. From their wedlock and cohabitation on 14th November, 2008, they were blessed with a son, i.e., Master Dilpreet Singh. 3. The respondent-husband, i.e., Shri Prit Pal Singh, filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia)and(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on 9 th June, 2011 for gra...

Sujata Sharma Vs. Manju Gupta

Court : Delhi

..... and negation of her fundamental right of equality guaranteed by the constitution having regard to the need to render social justice to women, the states of andhra pradesh tamil nadu, karnataka and maharashtra have made necessary changes in the law giving equal right to daughters in hindi mitakshara coparcenary property. the kerala legislature has enacted the kerala joint hindu family system .....

Sanjeev Nanda Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT775

..... sphere. any latitude shown to them in that sphere would tempt them to make driving frivolous and a frolic.354. similar view was taken in state of karnataka v. sharanappa basanagouda aregoudar : 2002crilj2020 , the relevant observations are reproduced below:6. we are of the view that having regard to the serious nature of the ..... committee on reforms of criminal justice system, government of india, ministry of home affairs headed by dr. justice v.s. malimath, formerly, chief justice of karnataka and kerala high courts, popularly known as the malimath committee report, the reasons behind such low rate of conviction in india were reported as under:2.19.3 ..... must be understood that the cases of intentional or knowingly inflicted acts of crime, directly and willfully, are excluded. the apex court in rathnashalvan v. state of karnataka : 2007crilj1451 , while interpreting section 304a ipc held as under:7. section 304a applies to cases where there is no intention to cause death and no knowledge that .....

Emca Construction Co. Thr. M.P. Gupta Vs. Archelological Survey of Ind ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 164(2009)DLT515

..... glory of our structure, culture, sculptural, artistic or archaeological significance, artistic skills and the vision and wisdom of our ancestors, which should be preserved and perpetuated so that our succeeding generations learn the skills of our ancestors and traditions, cultural and civilisation. they would have the advantage to ..... nor feasible. we are also not a little concerned that the asi, which is entrusted with the constitutional and statutory responsibility of ensuring preservation of our ancient and protected monument, is facilitating the violation of the notification dated 16th june 1992 by granting permissions for construction in ..... , hanamkonda, district warangal, andhra pradesh; sher shah's tomb, sasaram, bihar; rock edict of ashoka, kopbal, district raichur, karnataka; fort wall, bijapur, karnataka; gomateswara statute at sravanabelagola, district hassan, karnataka; elephanta caves, gharapuri, district kolaba, maharashtra.[no. f.8/2/90-m]m.c. joshi, director general.12. it is .....

College Section Officers Association and ors. Vs. University of Delhi ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)503; 2000(56)DRJ1

..... . state of up and others', : (1996)iillj707sc . 4. 'university grants commission vs . sadhana chaudhary & oth-ers', : (1997)iillj272sc . 5. 'rao somashekara & others vs . state of karnataka & another', : (1997)7scc649 . 6. 'vice chancellor, g.b.pant university of agriculture and technology & another vs . dr.kewala nand & others : air1998sc3321 . 26. the learned counsel for the ..... taka secondary school teachers were brought on a par with those of the secondary school teachers of the erstwhile hyderabad state allotted to the state of karnataka. in other words, the state took about fourteen years to set right the disparities. as to whether any inquiry is necessary for deciding about ..... or the continuance would lose its temporary character arising out of section 119 of the states reorganisation act. it may be that the state of karnataka felt that the grievnce of the non-allotted primary school teachers whose salaries were lesser than the salaries of non-allotted secondary school teachers was .....

Bhilasha Garg and anr. Vs the Appropriate Authority (Pndt Act) Dc (Eas ...

Court : Delhi

1.Whether reporters of the local news papersbe allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2.To be referred to the Reporter or not Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest Yes ORDER1. The validity of an order dated 26th November 2009 passed by the Chief District Medical Officer (CDMO), East District, Directorate of Health Services, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) cancelling the registration under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (PNDT Act) in favour of Abhilasha Maternity & Medical Clinic (AMMC), (Petitioner No. 2), the owner of which is Petitioner No. 1, has been challenged by way of this writ petition.2. During the pendency of the writ petition, an order dated 27th January 2010 was passed by the CDMO suspending the registration of Petitioner No. 1 under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (MTP Act). The Petitioners filed CM No. 1880 of 2010 challenging the said order dated 27 t...

Rohit Shekhar Vs. Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... accredited laboratory with established and accepted credentials and expertise which meets the publicly sanctioned standards. (xix) appropriate directions covering the technical aspects with regard to drawing, preservation, transportation, and integrity of the sample specimen must be made so that integrity and identity of the sample/specimen is guaranteed. (xx) the court could ..... of confusion of conflicting contentions. (underlining supplied) this judgment has also been referred to in para 174 of (2010) 7 scc 263 selvi vs. state of karnataka (at page 354). 180. the minimal intrusion involved in a blood sample; the miniscule pain involved ; its widespread use in medical testing and otherwise and ..... or dna profiling were not an issue which was answered in para 264 of the judgment rendered by the supreme court in selvi vs. state of karnataka (supra). the same has thus no bearing on the instant case. whether the court order directing a blood sample for dna profiling can be physically enforced .....

M/S. Bata India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... whether or not to make a reference. in no case whatever can it perform an adjudicatory function. it cannot go into the merits of the dispute. that is squarely the preserve of the labour court or industrial tribunal. the discretion that the government has is confined to determining whether, as a result of making a reference, there will be industrial unrest ..... the act.11. in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.2, it has been stated that the petitioners had obtained permission of the government of west bengal, karnataka, u.p., delhi and maharashtra under the shops and establishment act of the respective states to keep their shops open for extended working hours and observe 7 days week which .....