Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 section 23 rules Court: delhi Page 7 of about 806 results (0.774 seconds)

Shama Kaur and ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008ACJ2453

..... court titled as land acquisition officer-cum-d.s. w.o., a.p. v. b.v. reddy & sons : [2002]1scr1041 and the judgment titled as p. mahendran v. state of karnataka : air1990sc405 .25. as regards the claim for compensation on account of pain and agony, mr. haque, learned counsel for respondents, submitted that this was not agitated before tribunal except in ..... accident giving rise to the claim had taken place before 14.11.1994.39. on the other hand, the high court of karnataka in the case of guruanna vadi v. general manager, karnataka state road trans. corporation 2001 acj 1528 (karnataka), has on the issue of retrospective application of the act concurred with the view held by division bench of this court in .....

Federation of Indian Airlines and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... circulars and the circulars being in consonance with the provision cannot be declared ultra vires. he has placed reliance on the decision rendered in khoday distilleries ltd. v. state of karnataka, (1996) 10 scc 304.49. mr.p.k.ray, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.12, while supporting the submissions made by the learned counsel for the other co .....

The Central Secretariat Stenographers Service Association and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Delhi

..... a larger bench. as far as the tribunal is concerned, it was in any case bound by that judgment.22. the supreme court in m.a. murthy v. state of karnataka : (2003) 7 scc 517, inter alia, observed as below:the doctrine of binding precedent helps in promoting certainty and consistency in judicial decisions and enables an organic development of the .....

Parshadi and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT436

..... rural areas, and to curb speculation in land and housing in consonance with macro-economic policies for efficient and equitable growth.-- to promote vernacular architecture and to preserve the nation's rich heritage in the field of human settlements.'it was emphasised that the element of the national housing policy in terms of para 4. ..... contended that the court will not issue mandamus to the government to withdraw from acquisition. in this connection he has cited s.p. subramanya shetty and others v. karnataka state road transport corporation and others : [1997]3scr370 . it was further contended by mr. rohtagi that when the acquisition is to be withdrawn the beneficiary, i. ..... for which the council of ministers would be collectively responsible. this view was reiterated by a larger bench of seven judges of this court in state of karnataka v. union of india. in para 46 this court held that the object of collective responsibility is to make the whole body of persons holding ministerial office .....

Ram Murti Wadhwa Vs. Union of India Etc.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi691

..... jurisdiction of the supreme court and high courts under article 32 and article 226 of the constitution of india respectively to issue writs to any person or authority has been preserved. 5.conclusions (i) writ of certiorari(55) to sum up : nothing has been shown which would induce us to hold that the finding and sentence as confirmed are tainted with ..... inquiry the request was made the appellant was told 'this : 'thecommandant has considered your request for getting the bills photographed or examined by experts. he has opined that you arc tree to ask any questions regarding the authenticity of these documents during the recording of summary of evidence or even at the court-.martial, if and when it is held.'(35 .....

M/S. L.G. Electronics India Private Limited Vs. the Asstt. Commissione ...

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

..... respect of any transaction, then sub- sec. (1) requiring reference to him by the ao, will be rendered useless. in our considered opinion, this contention misses the wood from the tree. the jurisdiction of the tpo is activate only when the ao makes reference to him under sub-section (1) for determining alp in respect of certain transactions. sub-secs. (2a .....

Angle Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ashok Manchanda and Others

Court : Delhi

..... the order dated 14th november, 2014 in the execution petition at gurgaon. there is thus, no equity in their favour and the execution proceedings at gurgaon cannot be preserved by this court inasmuch as the procedure prescribed under section 39 has to be mandatorily followed. 128. the order dated 14th november, 2014 was assailed by way of ..... enabling act. 69. in this regard, we may advert to the judicial pronouncements of the supreme court. in a judgment reported at (1983) 2 scc 402 state of karnataka and anr. v. h. ganesh kamath and ors. the supreme court struck down certain rules made under the motor vehicles act as being inconsistent with the act. it was ..... sahu [(1996) 11 scc 528] where the court in the guise of arithmetical mistake on reconsideration of the matter came to a fresh conclusion as to the number of trees and the valuations thereof in the matter which had already been finally decided. similarly in the case of bai shakriben v. special land acquisition officer [(1996) 4 scc 533 .....

The Staff Superintendent of State Bank of Patiala Vs. the Presiding Of ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1985(1)SLJ411(Delhi)

..... is not traceable. i very much hope that the concerned authorities will give it a serious thought as to how a file which is meant to be preserved is not traceable, a rather embarrassing situation. dr. anand prakash contended thereupon that as the government had not filed any affidavit in reply it must be ..... .(58) though i might have been inclined to lean towards the more liberal approach of applying the principles of natural justice recently expressed in the decisions of the madras karnataka, calcutta and punjab & haryana high courts in g. muthukrishnan v. administrative manager new horizon sugar mills (p) ltd., pondicherry and other 1980(1) llj 215, ..... 'indian telephones industries ltd. v. state of karnataka & others' 1978 (1) llj 544, 'american express international banking corporation v. union of india and others' 1979 (2) llj 22(33) and m|s. escorts limited v .....

New Delhi Municipal Council Vs. Prominent Hotels Limited

Court : Delhi

..... favourable order would undoubtedly tantamount to interference with the due course of judicial proceedings 29.17. contempt jurisdiction has been conferred on superior courts not only to preserve the majesty of law by taking appropriate action against the contemnor, but also to keep the stream of justice clear and pure so that the parties who ..... 11.5. in b. sharma rao h. ganeshmal v. head quarters asstt. (supra), the petitioners challenged the show cause notice under section 4(1) of the karnataka public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1974 before the civil court on the ground that they were not unauthorised occupants. the supreme court held the suit to ..... misuse has been taken by ndmc in the written statement. ndmc is estopped from raising the issue of alleged misuse at this stage. reliance is placed on coffee board, karnataka v. commissioner of commercial taxes (1988) 3 scc 263, chairman and md, ntpc ltd. v. reshmi construction, builders and contractors (2004) 2 scc 663 and .....

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

..... of a power is included in the grant of the power." 197. the black's law dictionary defines the word 'police' as under:- "the governmental department charged with the preservation of public order, the promotion of public safety, and the prevention and detection of crime." 198. similarly, the words 'criminal law' and 'criminal procedure' have been defined ..... (emphasis supplied) 29. the nature, scope and applicability of article 131 of the constitution again fell for consideration by another seven judge bench of the supreme court in state of karnataka v. union of india; (1977) 4 scc 608. reiterating the principles laid down in state of rajasthan v. union of india (supra), it was held: "146. ..... upon the full bench decision of the high court of punjab and haryana in state of punjab v. union of india; air 1971 pandh 155 and state of karnataka v. union of india (supra). 23. rebutting the contention of the non-applicants that the applications which have been filed at the fag end of proceedings are .....