Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 section 23 rules Court: delhi Page 5 of about 806 results (0.130 seconds)

Oct 21 2003 (HC)

Educate India Society Vs. All India Council for Technical Education

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)91; 108(2003)DLT274

..... concerned. ordinarily, however, the management should insist for a bond from the concerned students'. 11. in t.m.a. pai foundation and others v. state of karnataka and others, : (2002)8scc481a the apex court had observed thus:-'55. the constitution recognizes the right of the individual or religious denomination, or a religious or linguistic ..... court in islamic academy of education and another v. state of karnataka and others, : air2003sc3724 . 4. in january, 2003, the society framed its scheme for admission of students on merit-based selection criteria and also fixed the ..... case (supra), however, has been reviewed by the eleven judge constitution bench of the apex court in t.m.a. pai foundation and others v. state of karnataka and others, : (2002)8scc481a and a substantially different regime has been established. tma pai has further been explained by a constitution bench of the hon'ble supreme .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2007 (HC)

Modi Rubber Ltd. Vs. Guardian International Corp.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR133(Delhi); 141(2007)DLT822

..... not in its favor. the petitioner is likely to be suffered irreparable loss and damage. the relief to which the petitioner would be entitled is preservative so as to preserve the subject matter of the dispute. the respondent has relied upon several covenants of the very agreement which it claims to have terminated and has sought ..... conciliation act, an interim order could be passed in accordance with the statutory provisions which would include the provisions of the specific relief act for the purposes of preservation, interim custody or sale of goods. in this case it was held that the parties were acting pursuant to a share holders agreement dated 18th june, ..... again challenged the termination of the sha as being wrongful and has made a counter claim to this effect. in the present proceedings, the petitioner has sought preservation of the status quo on the plea that the petitioner would suffer irreparable loss and damage if the respondent is not prohibited from committing breach of clause 14 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2008 (HC)

Krishna Adit Agarwal Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT669

..... as in p.a. inamdar (supra) is to lay emphasis on maintenance of excellence and higher standards, inter alia, in professional courses, the action of the respondents' in seeking to preserve 100% seats in acms for the wards of army/ex-army personnel and war widows even otherwise does not appear to be constitutionally valid. as i have observed above, the ..... its being provided.26. after the decision of the supreme court in t.m.a. pai foundation and ors. v. state of karnataka and ors. : air2003sc355 , the supreme court in islamic academy of education and anr. v. state of karnataka and ors. : air2003sc3724 clarified various aspects of t.m.a. pai foundation (supra). in para 6 of this decision (at page 720 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 1978 (HC)

Gurbaksh Singh Vs. Delhi State Industrial Development Corporation and ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1978Delhi262

..... against respondent no. 2, what he has, in substance, sought for is a writ to respondent no. 1, the state of karnataka, not to enforce its direction to admit certain number of 'karnataka' students to respondent no. 2-college.'the decision does not specifically deal with the point under our consideration and is not thereforee of much ..... as companies incorporated under the companies act.30. another decision cited by mr. sistani was arun narayan v. st ate of karnataka, : air1976kant174 . in that case, a division bench of the high court of karnataka dealt with the question of admission of a student to a private medical college. the division bench held at page 178 ..... since it (respondent no. 2) feels obliged to obey the direction of the government to admit certain number of 'karnataka' students to its college, the petitioner can ask for a writ restraining respondent no. 1, the state of karnataka, from enforcing any direction given by it (respondent no. 1), hence, it would, in our opinion, be too .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2008 (HC)

Smt. Veena Gupta W/O Shri Lalit Gupta Vs. Director of Education,

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 147(2008)DLT626; 2008(101)DRJ666

..... not be of much help to the petitioner, in view of the recent decision of the constitution bench of the supreme court reported in the case of secretary, state of karnataka v. umadevi and ors. : (2006)iillj722sc . moreover, in rabinarayan mohapatra's case, the supreme court has taken into consideration the provisions of the validation act which were in force in ..... devi lpa no. 716/20047. union of india and ors. v. bishamber dutt : (1997)iillj381sc 8. state of haryana v. jasmer singh and ors. : (1997)iillj667sc 9. secretary, state of karnataka v. umadevi and ors. : (2006)iillj722sc 10. dr. (mrs.) chanchal goyal v. state of rajasthan : [2003]2scr112 9. it is no more rest integra that regularization is not a mode .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 1997 (HC)

G.R. Simon Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi301; 1997(41)DRJ604; (1997)117PLR66

..... and improve the natural environment including various lakes, rivers and wild life and to have compassion for living creatures. the contention of the petitioners that protection and preservation of wild life was not in public interest was thereforee devoid of all merit. wild life forms part of our cultural heritage in the same manner as other ..... filed in these writ petitions. the stand of the respondents may be briefly summarized. the amendment act of 1986 was constitutionally invalid. it was brought about for the preservation of wild life. it was contended that the amendment in the schedules of wild life (protection) act 1972 was not the first one but was the fourth one ..... after the slay granted by the delhi high court. in addition, 2,95,000 skins were exported pursuant to the permission granted vide orders of the high court of karnataka and they were left with 2,97,685 snake skins. after taking into account the skins of other animals, such as lizards, crocodile, wild cat, tiger, leopard .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 1997 (HC)

Jagdish Chandra Trikha Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)753; AIR1998Delhi266; 4(1996)CLT513; [2000]100CompCas839(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT874

..... , delivery of goods for repair, etc. and the point at which c involved-safe custody. warehousemen, of course, are bailees, but they are more concerned with the preservation of merchandise, than the safety of valuables, which is the banks' special concern.lt is generally considered (though opinions to the contrary have been expressed) that bailment is ..... plaintiff, had to leave the comfort of their hearth and home and left their moveable and immovable properties uncared for, to ensure protection of their life and preservation of whatever little they could salvagewhile leaving what was then their homeland. a test as to what a prudent person would have done in relation to his own ..... petitioner's counsel the doth and paper wrappers and the tin box were put in a cloth, which having been duly sealed was entrusted to the ahlmad for preserving the same,all the persons signing the inventory remained present throughout during the period of opening the box brought by shri b. k. sharma and sealing the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 1999 (HC)

Marriott International Inc. and Others Vs. Ansal Hotels Ltd. and Anoth ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)340; AIR2000Delhi377; 82(1999)DLT137

..... the petition is infructuous, untenable and misconceived and the same is denied by the petitioners. the petition is in aid of arbitration, seeking interim protection to preserve the status quo until the arbitration tribunal the forum chosen by the parties under the agreements - decides the merits of the dispute, including whether the purported ..... a waiver of that agreement, and thereby even otherwise a party to an arbitration agreement is permitted to approach a judicial authority for interim measures to preserve the assets and valuable rights with are the subject matter of dispute in arbitration. in view thereof even contractually also the parties have agreed to the ..... 9 read with section 2(2) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 does not restrict the court's powers and jurisdiction to grant interim orders preserving the legal rights of the petitioners. he submitted that the respondents are located within the jurisdiction of this court. mr.desai also submitted that all marriott .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 1994 (HC)

Mahavir Singh Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR535]; ILR1995Delhi529

..... got right to justify his action and adduce evidence before the labour court even in case where no domestic enquiry held.14. he also place reliance on the decision of karnataka high court in the case of visl contract workers association v. visvesaraya iron steel ltd. vol. 79 factories journal reports page 172, wherein it has been held that jurisdiction of ..... regard was placed on supreme court decision in the case jitender nath bids was v. m/s. empire of india tea co. : (1989)iillj572sc and of karnataka high court in the case of hariba v. karnataka state road transport corporation : (1983)iillj76kant , where in has been held that a consideration namely, that the opposite party should not be denied of a valuable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1984 (HC)

Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Territory of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1995Delhi49

..... not be slaughtered. the committee thereforee suggests that the norms as laid down in sections 5 & 6 of the andhra pradesh prohibition of cow slaughter and animals preservation act, 1977 should be immediately implemented in the case of calves.as regarding sheep/goat the committee suggests a minimum age of 18 months, because a young lamb ..... of animal is the first threshold test to consider its use or potential use for breeding, milking etc. the andhra pradesh prohibition of cow slaughter and animals preservation act, 1977 in section 5 and 6 stipulates a minimum age of 3 years in respect of calf, irrespective of its sex. it further prescribes that any ..... are injurious to health.48. the state shall endeavor to organise agricultural and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines and shall in particular, take steps for preserving and improving the breeds and prohibiting the slaughter of cows and calves and other milch and draught cattle.48a. the state shall endeavor to protect and improve the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //