Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka preservation of trees act 1976 section 23 rules Court: delhi Page 1 of about 806 results (0.269 seconds)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

..... the respondents further state that the supreme court in bank of baroda (supra) held that if the existence of certain facts and circumstances was necessary to preserve the constitutionality of an impugned law, those facts and circumstances could be presumed to exist by the court. the principles laid down in a judgment have ..... the law commission of india have all come after the three pronouncements in question the last being in 1996.869. the circumstances and conditions in tamil nadu; karnataka; rajasthan and maharashtra, four large states, vary from the prevalent conditions in delhi a metropolis which is a union territory. the demographic profile of the ..... general public revenues can, with justification, be utilised to meet, wholly or in substantial part, the expenses on the administration of civil justice. many states including karnataka and rajasthan had, earlier, statutory upper limits fixed for the court fee. but later legislation has sought to do away with the prescription of an upper .....

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi an ...

Court : Delhi

..... the respondents further state that the supreme court in bank of baroda (supra) held that if the existence of certain facts and circumstances was necessary to preserve the constitutionality of an impugned law, those facts and circumstances could be presumed to exist by the court. the principles laid down in a judgment have ..... the law commission of india have all come after the three pronouncements in question the last being in 1996.869. the circumstances and conditions in tamil nadu; karnataka; rajasthan and maharashtra, four large states, vary from the prevalent conditions in delhi a metropolis which is a union territory. the demographic profile of the ..... general public revenues can, with justification, be utilised to meet, wholly or in substantial part, the expenses on the administration of civil justice. many states including karnataka and rajasthan had, earlier, statutory upper limits fixed for the court fee. but later legislation has sought to do away with the prescription of an upper .....

Federation of Okhla Industrial Association (Regd.) vs.lt Governor of D ...

Court : Delhi

..... minimum wage rates should be fixed in the scheduled industries with the dual object of providing sustenance and maintenance of the worker and his family and preserving his efficiency as a worker. (emphasis supplied) 131. interestingly the irrelevancy of the paying capacity of the employer has assumed importance as an important ..... mr. nanavati must fail. (emphasis supplied) 155. in the judgment reported at ilr1985karnataka 688 aspinwal and co. limited & ors. v. state of karnataka, the karnataka high court reiterated the above pointing out that it was essential for the person objecting to show that the government official so nominated suffered from bias in ..... jammu & kashmir assam west bengal jharkhand manipur meghalaya mizoram nagaland odisha arunachal pradesh bihar sikkim tripura rajasthan punjab haryana h.p. kerala andhra pradesh tamilnadu telangana karnataka gujarat maharashtra chhatisgarh madhya pradesh goa u.t. lakshadweep andman & nicobar daman & diu dadar haveli nagar 1.2. 3.4.5.6.7.8. .....

Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools vs.directorate of ...

Court : Delhi

..... choice. secularism and equality being two of the basic features of the constitution, article 30(1) ensures protection to the linguistic and religious minorities, thereby preserving the country. furthermore, the principles of equality must necessarily apply to the enjoyment of such rights. no law can be framed that will discriminate against ..... does unni krishnan case require reconsideration?. 34. in examining this issue, the supreme court first referred to its earlier decision in mohini jain v. state of karnataka, (1992) 3 scc666 in which it was held that any fee charged, by private educational institutions, in excess of that charged by government educational institutions ..... the exercise of dispensation of education. education is classically regarded as charitable , and not geared at earning profit. money, however, does not grow on trees, and, while educational institutions are entitled to earn profit, in order to survive, and to augment their resources and aim at higher standards, they cannot .....

Mount Carmel School Society and Anr vs.director of Education and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... choice. secularism and equality being two of the basic features of the constitution, article 30(1) ensures protection to the linguistic and religious minorities, thereby preserving the country. furthermore, the principles of equality must necessarily apply to the enjoyment of such rights. no law can be framed that will discriminate against ..... does unni krishnan case require reconsideration?. 34. in examining this issue, the supreme court first referred to its earlier decision in mohini jain v. state of karnataka, (1992) 3 scc666 in which it was held that any fee charged, by private educational institutions, in excess of that charged by government educational institutions ..... the exercise of dispensation of education. education is classically regarded as charitable , and not geared at earning profit. money, however, does not grow on trees, and, while educational institutions are entitled to earn profit, in order to survive, and to augment their resources and aim at higher standards, they cannot .....

Priyanka Gogna Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 109(2004)DLT456

..... course was quashed. however, the infraction of a mandatory stipulation, as that of the mci, was not in question. for this very reason the decisions in rajendra prasad mathur v. karnataka university, : [1986]2scr912 , ashok chand singhvi v. university of jodhpur, : [1989]1scr230 , km. maxey charan v. rohilkhand university, bareilly and anr., : air1992all122 , harpreet singh randhawa and anr. v. state of ..... cwapp category which is at best a separate channel of entry of candidates, in contradistinction to candidates enjoying a constitutional reservation.'5. in medical council of india v. state of karnataka and ors., vi : [1998]3scr740 , the hon'ble supreme court had opined that the 'indian medical council act is relatable to entry 66 of list i (union list). it prevails .....

Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.1mg Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... details of the sellers, they offer a comfortable refuge for parties breaching their contracts with the plaintiffs. this refuge by itself constitutes inducement.317. the preservation and maintenance of the integrity of commercial contracts is a necessity in the modern day world. if society is permitted to induce or encourage breach of ..... performance or damages by the persons breaching the contract, it would result in complete dissipation of contractual integrity. the legal system has to work towards preservation and compliance with contractual terms and not encourage violation of the same.318. the minimum conduct expected of the platforms is adherence to their own ..... , the legislation will take effect only when it is published through the customarily recognised official channel, namely, the official gazette (b.k. srinivasan v. state of karnataka) [(1987) 1 scc658. admittedly, the guidelines were not gazette. 151. in the case of ndmc v. tanvi trading (supra), the supreme court was considering .....

Leena Tuteja Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... for the petitioner is also satisfied but has contended that, (i) as far as uoi is concerned, its attention is directed against the states of rajasthan, madhya pradesh, telangana, maharashtra, karnataka, west bengal and jammu & kashmir and not adequate steps have been taken vis- -vis delhi and should be asked to clarify; this contention is made on the basis of the .....

Food Corporation of India Vs. Laxmi Narain

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2001(58)DRJ2

..... in question. 40. on consideration of the totality of facts and circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that benefit given to the petitioners in the judgments of karnataka and punjab & haryana high court cannot be extended to the respondents herein because of the aforesaid reasons. both these judgments were delivered on the peculiar facts and ..... the impugned judgment. the learned single judge on 29.5.1998 has allowed the application and observed that 'i have perused the judgment of the high court of karnataka. fci was not a party to that judgment. thereforee, that portion in para 8 in which fci was a party shall stand deleted.' 13. learned counsel for ..... them. the fci rejected their representations. thereafter, the respondents filed writ petitions before this court. the writ petitions were allowed on the strength of the judgment of the karnataka high court delivered in civil writ petition no. 7695 of 1976 k.p. thomas vs. union of india on 31.1.1977. 6. the appellant fci is .....

indus Towers Ltd. Vs. Cit and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... also argued that reliance on circular no.1/2008 relating to cold storage units is misplaced. the said circular clarified that the main function of the cold storage is to preserve the perishable goods by means of a mechanical process, and storage of such goods is only incidental in nature. the customer is also not given any right to use ..... that service tax is also leviable on renting of immovable property. merely because the nature of certain receipts of the assessee has been treated as service by the hon ble karnataka high court, it does not preclude the payments received from the said activity as rent for the purposes of 1941 of the i.t, act. these two statutes are ..... the receipts were subject to levy of service tax by union of india or levy of value added tax by the delhi government. the decisions of the hon ble karnataka high court and the hon ble delhi high court cannot be applied in the facts and circumstances of this case and are clearly distinguishable. the observations of both the .....