Skip to content


Grid Code - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: grid code Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 10,780 results (0.783 seconds)
Dec 06 2001 (HC)

Muniakkayyamma Vs. Hanumakka and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-06-2001

Reported in: ILR2002KAR3722; 2002(2)KarLJ64

return the records of the land tribunal at the earliest code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 section

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 2001 (HC)

international Association of Lions Clubs Vs. National Association of I ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-10-2001

Reported in: 2002(25)PTC84(Bom)

subject to the limitations specified under the provisions of the code the provisions of section 41 of the code provides for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 2001 (HC)

Pragji Vrindavan Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. and ors. Vs. State ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-03-2001

Reported in: AIR2002Bom6; 2001(4)BomCR748; (2001)4BOMLR578; 2002(1)MhLj298

mischief it is sufficiently indicated under different provisions of the code that the arresting officer should exercise his power or discretion

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 16 2001 (HC)

D.K. Goel Vs. Dr. (Mrs.) Kamal Sujit

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-16-2001

Reported in: 2001(4)ALLMR52

of the code the provisions of section 41 of the code provides for arrest by a police officer without an order

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 2001 (HC)

Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. V.K. Pandey, Joint Commissioner of Income-tax ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-25-2001

Reported in: (2001)170CTR(Bom)493; [2001]251ITR209(Bom)

taking recourse to the provisions of section 438 of the code by approaching the court of session or the high court

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 05 2001 (HC)

Malani Trading Co. and Malani Tendu Leaves Vs. Commissioner of Income- ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-05-2001

Reported in: [2001]252ITR670(Bom)

why on the strength of section 156 3 of the code any restriction should be read into the power specifically granted

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 10 2001 (HC)

Surendrakumar S. Surana Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-10-2001

Reported in: 2002(1)ALLMR1017; 2002(3)BomCR343; 2002(1)MhLj504

taking recourse to the provisions of section 438 of the code by approaching the court of session or the high court

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 19 2001 (HC)

Voltas Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-19-2001

Reported in: 2002(140)ELT375(Bom)

taking recourse to the provisions of section 438 of the code by approaching the court of session or the high court

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 10 2001 (HC)

Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-10-2001

Reported in: 2002(139)ELT273(Bom)

be specified under the provisions of chapter xii of the code in terms of section 41 a police officer may arrest

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 2001 (HC)

Raj. Small Industries Corporation Ltd. Vs. Smt. Chandra Kanta Purohit ...

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-30-2001

Reported in: 2001(2)WLC668; 2001(4)WLN426

judge is directed to decide the suit expeditiously civil procedure code 1908 order 39 rules 1 and 2 temporary injunction house

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //