Grid Code - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: grid code Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 10,552 results (0.684 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sudhirkumar Chottubhai
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-13-2000
Reported in: [2001]250ITR528(Bom)
subject to the limitations specified under the provisions of the code the provisions of section 41 of the code provides for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. K.E.C. International Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-19-2000
Reported in: [2000]256ITR354(Bom)
why on the strength of section 156 3 of the code any restriction should be read into the power specifically granted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rhone Poulenc Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-14-2000
Reported in: (2001)168CTR(Bom)45; [2000]246ITR699(Bom)
mischief it is sufficiently indicated under different provisions of the code that the arresting officer should exercise his power or discretion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Punit Commercial Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-08-2000
Reported in: [2000]245ITR550(Bom)
a distinct and different power under section 44 of the code empowers the magistrate to arrest or order any person to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-27-2000
Reported in: [2001]250ITR592(Bom)
hence the appeal is dismissed no order as to costs code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Bangalore Vs. Gundappa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-04-2000
Reported in: [2000(86)FLR94]; 2000(2)KarLJ506
three months from the date of receipt of this order code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 sections
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ghodawat Pan Masala Products Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-21-2000
Reported in: (2001)170CTR(Bom)45; [2001]250ITR570(Bom)
person to arrest the offender under section 44 of the code that power is vested in the court of the magistrate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-06-2000
Reported in: [2000]256ITR81(Bom)
mischief it is sufficiently indicated under different provisions of the code that the arresting officer should exercise his power or discretion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKallappa Vs. the Chairman, Jamakhandi Co-operative Bank Limited, Jamak ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-07-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)KarLJ49
maintainable in the civil court hence the revision is dismissed code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH.P. Lakshminarayana Vs. Karnataka Forest Development Corporation and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-16-2000
Reported in: ILR2000KAR5089; 2001(2)KarLJ623
the cadre of divisional manager no order as to costs code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 sections
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial