Grid Code - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: grid code Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 8,607 results (0.695 seconds)J. Rajanna Setty Vs. Patel Thimmegowda
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-19-1997
Reported in: AIR1998Kant86; [1998(79)FLR907]; ILR1998KAR1825; 1998(1)KarLJ79
interest as prayed for and the second appeal is allowed code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahender Singh Yadav Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-1997
Reported in: 1998(2)Crimes338; 71(1998)DLT50; 1998(44)DRJ185
as far as the charge under section 201 of the code is concerned i do feel that there is no material
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka Housing Board, Bangalore Vs. State of Karnataka and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-17-1997
Reported in: ILR1998KAR940; 1998(2)KarLJ559
are accordingly dismissed but without any order as to costs code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 sections
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Onkarnath Parshuram Mishra and Another Vs. the State of Maharasht ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-07-1997
Reported in: 1998BomCR(Cri)725
person to arrest the offender under section 44 of the code that power is vested in the court of the magistrate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRabindranath Mukhopadhyay and anr. Vs. Coal India Ltd. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-28-1997
Reported in: JT1997(3)SC715; 1997(3)SCALE78; (1997)4SCC252; [1997]2SCR585
alone what the judgment as defined in the civil procedure code embodying a concise statement of the case the points for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtmaram Mahadeo Gaikwad Vs. Muktabai Tamaram Gaikwad and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-09-1997
Reported in: 1997(3)ALLMR658(1); 1998BomCR(Cri)448
of providing such specific power under section 44 of the code then there could be no reason for such a power
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. M.D. Pendse
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-20-1997
Reported in: [2001]250ITR413(Bom)
subject to the limitations specified under the provisions of the code the provisions of section 41 of the code provides for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagdish Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-29-1997
Reported in: 1997(3)WLC38; 1997(1)WLN545
force and substance the same is hereby dismissed criminal procedure code section 391 amp 482 additional evidence only appellate court empowered
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoseph Alfonso Vs. State
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-12-1997
Reported in: 1998(5)BomCR577
the magistrate directs investigation under section 156 3 of the code by taking recourse to the provisions of section 438 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajesh Jagiamba Awasthi Vs. State
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-03-1997
Reported in: 1998(5)BomCR766
the magistrate directs investigation under section 156 3 of the code by taking recourse to the provisions of section 438 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial