Grid Code - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: grid code Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 5,436 results (0.68 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Progressive Engineering and Annapurna R ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-05-1992
Reported in: [1993]200ITR231(KAR); [1993]200ITR231(Karn)
answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 sections
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohamed Sharif Abdul Khalil Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-21-1992
Reported in: 1994(2)BomCR217
be specified under the provisions of chapter xii of the code in terms of section 41 a police officer may arrest
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Insurance Company Vs. Suneeta W/O. Madanlal Pardeshi and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-10-1992
Reported in: 1994(3)BomCR285
mischief it is sufficiently indicated under different provisions of the code that the arresting officer should exercise his power or discretion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajan Ajitkumar Sarkar Alias Rajan Bangali Vs. Shri S. Ramamurthi, Com ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-29-1992
Reported in: 1994(2)BomCR332
of the code the provisions of section 41 of the code provides for arrest by a police officer without an order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Haleem Siddiqui Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-27-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)BomCR251
person to arrest the offender under section 44 of the code that power is vested in the court of the magistrate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDhankumar Thakordas Javeri and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Great ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-30-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)BomCR59
be specified under the provisions of chapter xii of the code in terms of section 41 a police officer may arrest
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH. Vithaldas Bhat Vs. National Textile Corporation (S.M.) Ltd. and anr ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-20-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)BomCR360
mischief it is sufficiently indicated under different provisions of the code that the arresting officer should exercise his power or discretion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlan Joseph D'Souza Vs. Joyce Mariquinha D'Souza
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-02-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)BomCR480
subject to the limitations specified under the provisions of the code the provisions of section 41 of the code provides for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChunilal Pranjivandas and Co. and anr. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-02-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)BomCR401
person to arrest the offender under section 44 of the code that power is vested in the court of the magistrate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Maharashtra Vs. A.K. Mahansaria
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-05-1992
Reported in: 1993(3)BomCR455
he would now be liable to pay only the balance code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial