Grid Code - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: grid code Year: 1947 Page 1 of about 704 results (0.662 seconds)Odhavji Lakhamshi Vs. Sakarchand Dahyabhai
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-12-1947
Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR598
notice was issued under order xxi rule 16 of the code kassum goolam hoosein v dayabhai amarsi 1911 i l r
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNilmony Jalui Vs. Sm. Radharani Debi
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-19-1947
Reported in: AIR1948Cal224
it is admitted that there was a partition through the civil court of the property of the co sharers in 1941
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Venkataramaniah Chetty Vs. Pappamah
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-1947
Reported in: AIR1948Mad103; (1947)2MLJ153
wards act and an application under section 491 of the code of criminal procedure is not maintainable when there is another
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: the District Magistrate of Vizagapatam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-31-1947
Reported in: (1948)1MLJ332
to the principle and policy of section 496 of the code of criminal procedure 4 in bailable offences it is well
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUppalapati Venkataratnam Vs. Uppalapati Apparao
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-25-1947
Reported in: AIR1948Mad80; (1947)1MLJ271
2 to proceed under order 9 rule 9 civil procedure code the plaintiff in this case has chosen to proceed under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Saradambal Ammal Vs. E.R. Kandasamy Goundar and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-1947
Reported in: (1947)2MLJ374
words any interest in order 22 rule 20 of the code refer to interest in property and as the third plaintiff
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Kareem Sahib and anr. Vs. Muhammad Khader Khan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-1947
Reported in: (1947)2MLJ354
date according to him order 21 rule 29 of the code of civil procedure which relates to the execution of cross
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVaradaraja Chettiar Vs. Swami Maistry and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-1947
Reported in: (1947)2MLJ179
to the offence under section 447 of the indian penal code relating to the carrying away of the usufruct of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam NaraIn Vs. Shri Ram Lachman Janki Bharat Satrughan Hanumanji and o ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-25-1947
Reported in: AIR1948All195
by his father and contended that section 92 of the code had no application to a case of that nature the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalidas Chakravarty and ors. Vs. Sm. Sushila Bala Devi W/O Bibhuti Bhu ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-17-1947
Reported in: AIR1947Cal461
1 one jugal keot was the owner of two annas undivided share in a ferry ghat on 17 5 1896...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial