Grid Code - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: grid code Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 3,965 results (0.603 seconds)Karnataka theatres Ltd. and ors. Vs. S. Venkatesan
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-08-1988
Reported in: [1989]66CompCas679(Kar)
is allowed the proceedings are quashed the complaint is dismissed code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.P. Ananthadevarraj Urs Vs. Bangalore Turrf Club Lit and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-08-1988
Reported in: [1988]64CompCas692(Kar); ILR1988KAR3023
the state is upheld and the writ petition is dismissed code of criminal procedure 1973 c a no 2 1974 section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Bhalachandra Gangadhar Akul and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-07-1988
Reported in: 1988(3)BomCR169
the magistrate directs investigation under section 156 3 of the code by taking recourse to the provisions of section 438 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Sahaji Gajanan Jadhav
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-07-1988
Reported in: 1988(3)BomCR190
taking recourse to the provisions of section 438 of the code by approaching the court of session or the high court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Annappa Balappa Vanjele
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-12-1988
Reported in: 1988(3)BomCR206
mischief it is sufficiently indicated under different provisions of the code that the arresting officer should exercise his power or discretion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.D. Sutar, Food Inspector, Local Health Authority Vs. Chabulal Mahadu ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-21-1988
Reported in: 1988(3)BomCR631
why on the strength of section 156 3 of the code any restriction should be read into the power specifically granted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Hanmantsa Ganpatsa Katwa
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-12-1988
Reported in: 1988(3)BomCR687
a distinct and different power under section 44 of the code empowers the magistrate to arrest or order any person to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVishwanath Gangaram Ghugare Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-03-1988
Reported in: 1988(4)BomCR159
person to arrest the offender under section 44 of the code that power is vested in the court of the magistrate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarivansh S/O Vallabhdasji Battad and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-02-1988
Reported in: 1988(4)BomCR553
person to arrest the offender under section 44 of the code that power is vested in the court of the magistrate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLalitprashad Balaprashad Jaiswal Vs. Nandkishore Chhaganrao Khardekar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-26-1988
Reported in: 1988(4)BomCR516
taking recourse to the provisions of section 438 of the code by approaching the court of session or the high court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial